Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haven't heard anything.Does anyone have an update on the second Ukrainian team, Golubtsova & Belobrov? Are they signed up to compete anywhere? I was watching the young Ukrainian team on the JGP this morning & realized that I had not heard anything about G&B recently.
Even if Vasilisa and Valeri didn't loose those two points they wouldn't have won, not so?Haven't heard anything.
Unrelatedly, the last two JGP dance contests would have had different winners if the silver medalists' coaches and domestic tech panels had been paying attention to the rules. There's a lesson there, or there should be.
No, they would have won. They lost by 2.32 points. 2 full points of that is the deductions, so removing those already cuts the margin to 0.32.Even if Vasilisa and Valeri didn't loose those two points they wouldn't have won, not so?
Noted. So what's the point of having rules that are so open to such wide interpretation? The coaches should have the ability to challenge these rulings. Don't rhythmic gymnasts get that opportunity?No, they would have won. They lost by 2.32 points. 2 full points of that is the deductions, so removing those already cuts the margin to 0.32.
Then you have the character step, which due to the negative GOE from the fall designation dropped from its base value of 1.10 points to a value of 0.57 points. Even if they'd gotten exactly neutral GOE, they would have won. But realistically they would have gotten similar GOE to Natalie & Bruce, whose equivalent element was worth 3.59 points.
So without the falls being called they would have scored a comfortable (by ice dance standards) win.
The rule is clear and straightforward. Their coaches just (seemingly) mixed it up with the rules for another choreo element.So what's the point of having rules that are so open to such wide interpretation?
I do really like Isabella and Dimitry but it appears they were too nervous. Isabella lost her balance completing their sliding move near the end. They seemed a bit better at LPLID.
So why do they have test skates if not to iron out those issues? It makes them look....words fail me....The rule is clear and straightforward. Their coaches just (seemingly) mixed it up with the rules for another choreo element.
The issue was the design of the first spin. The issue was not caught by their coach, Dostatni. It wasn’t caught by Shawn Rettstatt, Judy Blumberg, Galit Chait, or Kristen Fraser (some of the callers in Dallas and Lake Placid).Was the issue on the first FD spin?
In Lake Placid International it was called (by Shawn Rettstatt, Galit Chait, Kristin Fraser) Level 2. They would have possibly lost even with the LPLID call (4.50 BV vs 3.75 BV. They received 5.82 overall in Lake Placid for that element vs 5.20 in Courchevel)
The problem is the rules rob coaches and choreographers of lattitude to be creative. It has created a void. So often times callers are just thirsty for a breath of fresh air, to appreciate something new, until the rules come back to haunt them. Ice dance is just like this.The issue was the design of the first spin. The issue was not caught by their coach, Dostatni. It wasn’t caught by Shawn Rettstatt, Judy Blumberg, Galit Chait, or Kristen Fraser (some of the callers in Dallas and Lake Placid).
The issue is the design of the element. It’s clearly designed to be a combination spin, but during the change of feet only Tsarevski changes feet. Flores stays on the same spinning foot, and instead uses her free leg to push into the 2nd part of the spin. Because he changes feet while she doesn’t, they don’t meet the definition of a combination dance spin. They’re also no longer performing a dance spin as he changed feet and she touched down with her free foot. Once that happened, they’re in the “exit” phase of the element, so the panel stops counting features.
By the time Tsarevski changes feet and Flores touches down with her free foot, they had only achieved a level 1 Dance Spin, so that’s all they got credit for, and just ended up having a very intricate exit phase.
What boggles my mind is the multitude of failures that occurred. Their coach, Dostatni, as a caller who has called the Olympics, should have known better. So should have Rettstatt, a member of the ISU technical committee! The other members of the technical panels in Dallas and Lake Placid too! For Flores & Tsarevski, not getting a Level 4 cost them a gold medal, and they have some of the biggest names in terms Ice Dance Officials to blame.
Coaches should use this opportunity to complain about how ridiculous the rules have become. If these 2 couldn’t even figure them out, how can anyone else?The issue was the design of the first spin. The issue was not caught by their coach, Dostatni. It wasn’t caught by Shawn Rettstatt, Judy Blumberg, Galit Chait, or Kristen Fraser (some of the callers in Dallas and Lake Placid).
The issue is the design of the element. It’s clearly designed to be a combination spin, but during the change of feet only Tsarevski changes feet. Flores stays on the same spinning foot, and instead uses her free leg to push into the 2nd part of the spin. Because he changes feet while she doesn’t, they don’t meet the definition of a combination dance spin. They’re also no longer performing a dance spin as he changed feet and she touched down with her free foot. Once that happened, they’re in the “exit” phase of the element, so the panel stops counting features.
By the time Tsarevski changes feet and Flores touches down with her free foot, they had only achieved a level 1 Dance Spin, so that’s all they got credit for, and just ended up having a very intricate exit phase.
What boggles my mind is the multitude of failures that occurred. Their coach, Dostatni, as a caller who has called the Olympics, should have known better. So should have Rettstatt, a member of the ISU technical committee! The other members of the technical panels in Dallas and Lake Placid too! For Flores & Tsarevski, not getting a Level 4 cost them a gold medal, and they have some of the biggest names in terms Ice Dance Officials to blame.
Solid point.Coaches should use this opportunity to complain about how ridiculous the rules have become. If these 2 couldn’t even figure them out, how can anyone else?
That also isn't a hard rule to keep track of. It's a change foot combination spin, which means that both have to change feet.Coaches should use this opportunity to complain about how ridiculous the rules have become. If these 2 couldn’t even figure them out, how can anyone else?
Because they botched simple details. Mistakes happen.If the rules are not complicated, then why are tech specialists screwing them up?
The issue may not be the rules per say. Many of these professionals are simply creatives. They just get carried away in the moment of the "feels" from a piece. Following the rules will take out the air, it is reduced to another set of elements. So thankfully they have these events.....Because they botched simple details. Mistakes happen.
Depends on the team — some list all the rhythms, some list only the blues portion, some list none.I noticed the ISU bios no longer list the rhythms the teams chose for the RD. Sometimes it is hard to tell by their skating.![]()
I'm surprised that so many people botched the details. Weren't K/A's programs reviewed at Russian test skates?Because they botched simple details. Mistakes happen.
Touché. However even setting aside my disdain for disco,I still maintain this British team is overrated. Their programs are appallingly open and highly dependent on flashy tricks and sexually charged slide maneuvers. Additionally,I believe they may be one of the most mismatched and unbalanced partnership since Fusar-Poli+Margaglio—his skating abilities are clearly far superior to hers.But now is their chance to rely on makeup and a lot of tongue.