Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In that case, I think the skaters can still do both. Competing in the GP series and doing part of the tour. It's a win win.I didn’t say they were against them and the rules are very vague, but I perceived it that for a skater to be considered on the national team you must compete in the fall. So you can’t skip the GP for instance. Which is reasonable. https://noticeboard.skatecanada.ca/2019/01/25/2019-2020-national-teams/
I don't think they will be able to do both at the same time. It is a very high intensity part of the season where teams do a lot of training in between events. I don't know how anyone would be able to tour at the same timeIn that case, I think the skaters can still do both. Competing in the GP series and doing part of the tour. It's a win win.
It says "Assigned to a 2019 ISU Grand Prix event" and "Competing in the 2019/2020 season". The second is indeed vague, and it's difficult to understand whether skaters really are obligated to compete in the fall. But, if they must, they can still compete in some other competition before the GPs, like W/P did this season (they competed in the Autumn Classic). There is nothing about having to compete in the GPs - it only says "assigned to a GP event". It would be strange and too harsh to deny skaters the chance to get onto the National team if they missed their GP(s), say, because of a trauma/for reasons of health. If SC don't want skaters skipping GPs for other reasons, they have to be more specific about it.I didn’t say they were against them and the rules are very vague, but I perceived it that for a skater to be considered on the national team you must compete in the fall. So you can’t skip the GP for instance. Which is reasonable. https://noticeboard.skatecanada.ca/2019/01/25/2019-2020-national-teams/
It’s Toronto and maybe to announce retirement one year after PYC![]()
Agree. I will still be sad.I won't be sad. T&S have done everything they possibly could as amateur competitors, and then some.
Agree. I will still be sad.
Thank you my friend, this is exactly it. I am thrilled for them, sad for meSame here. I'm not sad for them but for me. It's selfish but I just loved following their career and watching them skate. I'm sad that I won't see new competitive programs from them, that I won't see them winning again, that I won't have to get up in the middle of the night, sitting anxiously on my couch, rooting for them and cheering them on. There is just no other skater, no other couple who has what they had and I will really, really miss them. So the only thing left for me is the hope that they will tour in Europe and that I will at least see them in show programs.
Happy One Year, everyone!![]()
I've been bouncing between forum boards lately. Though I have been silent about some things, I must say that I wish people can be kinder to those who strive for something and with the best of intentions. The talk/review about Thank You Canada Tour by some people are just plain brutal. It's a shame that some call it saccharine or some form of another (i.e. boasting). My view is these Canadian skaters sincerely put out this show to show appreciation to the fans (and for each other) for their unwavering support throughout their career. Gee, what better way to show this appreciation than to skate their hearts out, right?
This is a great opportunity for Patrick Chan, Tessa Virtue & Scott Moir - ones who may be out from competitive circuit (Not official yet for VM but it may be likely they won't be in the Fourth Games as hinted in the article below). I just wish people would just be happy for them. If it's not your cup of tea, fine, don't watch. But don't be callous as to needless bash what is supposed to be a sincere effort showing Thanks.
Anyways, I got to get that off my chest.
Enjoy this piece!https://www.olympic.org/news/five-medals-three-games-two-consummate-figure-skaters
Same here. I'm not sad for them but for me. It's selfish but I just loved following their career and watching them skate. I'm sad that I won't see new competitive programs from them, that I won't see them winning again, that I won't have to get up in the middle of the night, sitting anxiously on my couch, rooting for them and cheering them on. There is just no other skater, no other couple who has what they had and I will really, really miss them. So the only thing left for me is the hope that they will tour in Europe and that I will at least see them in show programs.
It's not vague, though. You're assigned to a Grand Prix in the expectation that you will go. If you're medically unable to go, that's one thing; skipping a competition assignment to take a paying gig elsewhere is quite another.It says "Assigned to a 2019 ISU Grand Prix event" and "Competing in the 2019/2020 season". The second is indeed vague, and it's difficult to understand whether skaters really are obligated to compete in the fall. But, if they must, they can still compete in some other competition before the GPs, like W/P did this season (they competed in the Autumn Classic). There is nothing about having to compete in the GPs - it only says "assigned to a GP event". It would be strange and too harsh to deny skaters the chance to get onto the National team if they missed their GP(s), say, because of a trauma/for reasons of health. If SC don't want skaters skipping GPs for other reasons, they have to be more specific about it.
I will feel a twinge of sadness when the "official" retirement announcement comes, and there is a part of me that has a SEKRET desire to see them troll the skating world by announcing they intend to compete in Montreal next season (and then win and set off a gigantic round of hilarious whining/complaining/wuzrobbed from many other contingents!When skaters I love are retiring, I'm seldom sad at the time. I'd be sad if V&M continued on and things went sour, as I expect they would.But I'm usually at peace when my faves retire. It doesn't hit me, what you note above, until months and months later. After years of ups and downs with different skaters, that hole remains until someone new comes up. For me, V&M filled a Dubreuil & Lauzon-sized hole in my heart in 2008, so I was lucky. Now I have space for the myriad of really interesting teams coming up, or re-discovering teams I wasn't too hot on before, like C&B. I can sure as heck enjoy P&C without issue.
V&M left on such a high note - not just winning OGM, but they seemed HAPPY in their last two years. For whatever reason, they didn't seem to have the same spark/joy in the last years leading up to Sochi.
I do hope they will skate for a few more years. The skating market need their star power and they have so much more left to give.A recent article mentioned that they will skate for two years post Olympics. Also their tour will include the US.
Tessa wants to start MBA at Queens this year.
V&M left on such a high note - not just winning OGM, but they seemed HAPPY in their last two years. For whatever reason, they didn't seem to have the same spark/joy in the last years leading up to Sochi.
I don’t think they didn’t get uncomfortable (as I don’t think the rest of the Gadbois teams don’t feel uncomfortable, no matter what they say) — didn’t Zach D say P/C and V/M didn’t practice in the same rink last year?, but the difference between the two situations is, which is something they’ve talked about before, that in Montreal, they learned from their last 2 years in Canton and took charge of their career, their music choices, and what their vision was. They were very open in communication with their team and it helped a lot.I think they mentioned that the training environment in Detroit with Marina and Davis/White was tense and unhappy in a way that it wasn't in Montreal even though they were also training with their competitors P/C. Guess it's just personal chemistry why they were able to train alongside P/C without the training environment getting uncomfortable?