kittyjake5
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,543
Firing this fool doesn't undo the damage done by his actions, IMO:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/09/uk/danny-baker-tweet-royal-baby-gbr-scli-intl/index.html
What a dumb a**. He thought it was funny, really?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Firing this fool doesn't undo the damage done by his actions, IMO:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/09/uk/danny-baker-tweet-royal-baby-gbr-scli-intl/index.html
I thought I had. Yes I was wrong. My apologies.You made reference to the picture taking was done at Frogmore, you were informed it was in the castle, you ignored that & referenced Frogmore again, you were corrected again, now this discussion is silly? Can't you just admit you were wrong/misinformed?
What a dumb a**. He thought it was funny, really?
I think he was well aware of how the cartoon would be interpreted. The “it was just a joke” is a common defense when racism is called out.
. It's not the first time he has been sacked by the BBC but he has been given second chances before now. Hopefully he won't weald his way back this time.At least some people reacted to the birth in (IMO) a highly appropriate manner:
http://royalcentral.co.uk/uk/harrya...bears-in-honour-of-archie-to-hospitals-121794
We might have one or two appropriate candidates right here at FSU.At least some people reacted to the birth in (IMO) a highly appropriate manner:
http://royalcentral.co.uk/uk/harrya...bears-in-honour-of-archie-to-hospitals-121794

How Cute! And Great of them.At least some people reacted to the birth in (IMO) a highly appropriate manner:
http://royalcentral.co.uk/uk/harrya...bears-in-honour-of-archie-to-hospitals-121794
Archie haterz can suck it. One of my dogs is called Archie and he's a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel; a true Prince among hounds. There are even ancient laws allowing him to enter any shop in the land
Master Archie M-W will do just fine with such a name!! Belated congrats to Harry and Meghan and bravo to the Beeb for firing the ass off Danny Baker. The idiot has been grossly overpayed at the licence payers expense for being terminally unfunny for far too long IMO.
He’s more of a doofus than royal though. But a lovable, fun doofus!It doesn't matter that I have a dark olive complexion with dark kinky curly hair. I'm still me with ancestry of several heritages. That's just life, and it doesn't matter whether Archie is green, purple, blue, pink or red. It also doesn't matter if Archie has kinky, curly, straight hair and it doesn't matter what color it is. Archie is a human being, and he has two parents that love him very much.
I am in a similar family - with European ancestry that mixed with indigenous people in Mexico, along with Welsh/French heritage. I like to say that Ricos come in all shades and colors.
For those who can't get enough speculation/history about the new baby Sussex's names:
https://www.historyextra.com/period/modern/royal-baby-archie-harrison-mountbatten-windsor-history-meaning-name-harry-meghan/?utm_source=Twitter referral&utm_medium=t.co&utm_campaign=Bitly
Interesting that the writer highlights a different historic Archibald from the one that's been talked about all over the place these last few days (which is likely from a single source, some outlet that did a very quick historic search in an effort to get content online as fast as possible). Thanks for sharing!
He loved Susan Boyle?"Piers Morgan has commented: https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/08/pier...meghan-harry-striking-blow-diversity-9458548/
“So the royal couple, in a striking blow for diversity & feminism, have given their son one of the most popular white middle-class first names, Archie.[His] second name, Harrison, that was chosen because it stands for 'Harry's son' (I'm serious..). Hilarious,” the 54-year-old added.
He's such a tool. Does he approve of anything? If so, I've never heard of it.

So ... to take this to a lighter note ... I wonder if some online royal watchers are apoplectic that Meghan hasn't been carted off to the Tower of London ...
Well, since you brought it up, I'm happy to update you all on the train wreck of Meghan Pregnancy Conspiracy theories. Bullet pointed for everyone's convenience:
*She absolutely did not give birth. Postpartum bump was a pillow, her face was swollen from (pick one) alcohol/eating too much ramen/botox accident/excessive fillers, etc...
*The baby photographed yesterday was, in fact, not a baby, but a doll. One site has even located a doll that they believe looks exactly like the baby. (It doesn't. It looks like a doll while the baby looked like a baby). (My husband when I said that I'm not sure how they think they'll keep this facade up for very long as the baby will be expected to grow: "Maybe they were all fans of that "Small Wonder" show back in the day and think they'll be getting a robot child")
*If the baby is a baby, he is two weeks old. Proof: Harry making reference to babies changing a lot in the first two weeks.
*The birth certificate has to be filed within 42 days of birth. Once it is a) not filed at all (baby is a doll) or b) filed with the names of the real parents (because surrogacy and adoption are the same thing); Meghan will be arrested and hauled off to the Tower.

They don't hold prisoners in the Tower anymore.![]()
They don't hold prisoners in the Tower anymore.![]()
I am sure these crazies believe there is some secret cell down in the dungeons somewhere. I don’t get the impression they let reality get in the way of a good story!
