A very important question for the end of my post - what do you think of Gabi's new dress? Or at least I think it's new: I'd say it's a bit darker and a mix of navy blue and purple?
Oh, I thought something is wrong with my eyes


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A very important question for the end of my post - what do you think of Gabi's new dress? Or at least I think it's new: I'd say it's a bit darker and a mix of navy blue and purple?
I'm so used to it now itBiased it is.
I hate partisanships in commentary.
And no I'm sorry, Tessa&Scott wouldn't be able to do the Moonlight Sonata in the same way. Because that's not where they are at this moment. That is not their strengh. I hate that they are trying to throw shade like that but we're getting used to it.
Tbh, both him and Lane felt sounded more skeptical than usual right after V/M FD that I got surprised)
Maybe, I don't know if it was live I don't think so. But I doubt they watched it beforehand.Maybe they both already knew the results and looked for reasons explaining VM defeat when doing the commentary.. Or was the commentary done live?
I'm so used to it now itIt's to have a reassurance thing I guess ? Even though I find Kurt to like P/C a ton more than before, he told PJ Kwong he prefered their FD (Tbh, both him and Lane felt sounded more skeptical than usual right after V/M FD that I got surprised).
I'd like to have your opinion @MarieM : I rewatched both FD, without music to compare the so-called difficulty in both programs. Doing it I noticed a couple of things : Both have quite the same numbers of crossovers in transitions (the dancing part of it is different but there is nothing more difficult in one program or another), and in the feet in the step sequences, V/M have accents with head and P/Cfast arm movements (hence why it looks more difficult ?) but not the deepest edges. While I'll say V/M have acrobatic entries in lifts, P/C have the smoothest. But I didn't find the overall difficulty of one program, as superior as the other as everyone claims.
There is a reason every judge (including Canadian) gives the high marks and GOEs. You can't show up thinking it's in your bag you have to skate well. It's a bit of an excuse (that doesn't work tbh).Thanks for saying clearly what has been bothering me about the P/C critics who systematically posit that V/M have the better skating skills, are doing much harder things and have better deeper edges.
I rewatched several times the SD and really I'm blown by Gabi and Guillaumes Sd, their edges in particular, their body movements which are totally latin (very Rio Carnaval) , the whole dance is very attractive and addictive. I love it, even the music which has grown on me.
Also Gabriella doesn't have shallow edges and certainely not inferior edges to Tessa in the SD as far as I can tell after many reviewings.
What V/M have are the accrobatic lifts. I like the one in the SD, one being the maximum per dance as far as accrobatics are concerned for me and no crotch lift ever !
Often show taped next day. I am sure they watch it ahead. As well T/S are Carol's team's (G/P) rivals and as she is a biased commentator so she has subtle shade for them...It used to not be so subtle but a lot of people complained.Maybe they both already knew the results and looked for reasons explaining VM defeat when doing the commentary.. Or was the commentary done live?
There is a reason every judge (including Canadian) gives the high marks and GOEs. You can't show up thinking it's in your bag you have to skate well. It's a bit of an excuse (that doesn't work tbh).
From a strict "dancing" point of view, I think they are very good (I think they have the better arm movement in the business too). People are digging the SD much more than anticipated
I don't really know where the fact that Gaby has "shallow edges" comes from tbh. I get you don't want to watch the feet when looking at them (they have much more to offer, the big picture is their strength), however when you do focus on the feet, with no music, I don't see it. I see big edges too. Because she shines more than before, people are looking more at her and say "wait she is good". (Of course, she does twizzles on her own, right ?)
Reminds me when people were saying : "Charlie is so much better than Meryl". What ? Before I went to the forums I never saw anything like that. Weird how this kind of statements easily spread![]()
The other thing bothering me especially in TSL recap is why when talking about politics they always mention Didier but never the Canadian fed, are they supposed to be like the white sheep ? I would think politics would come from every corners come Olympics yet only Didier's name and sometimes Marina Zoueva's are talked about. Are we supposed to believe V/M are not supported and pushed by their own Fed ??? Plus Didier hasn't even been able to be elected at the head of ISU so I doubt he's that intimidating. They also systematically open the ID segment by naming Didier, every single time, it's getting ridiculous. I'm sorry but this week end P/C just skated both programs cleaner especially the SD actually, no need for Didier's intervention. Their pattern entry was mind blowing and fortunately the camera shot was perfect to understand how deep their edges are even Ben Agosto mentioned it. I also think photos capture their deep edges and matching body lines very well.
As for CBC, they're the kings of backhanded compliments. Nothing new. But they're getting a bit better than when P/C started. Maybe once V/M retire they'll acknowledge that P/C's programs to look that effortless require astounding SS and it's not easier than an all in your face type of choreography. Wishful thinking I know ...
IIRC, she wasn't happy for V/M return at all at first.Often show taped next day. I am sure they watch it ahead. As well T/S are Carol's team's (G/P) rivals and as she is a biased commentator so she has subtle shade for them...It used to not be so subtle but a lot of people complained.
I very much agree with everything said here. Those ubers, you don't find them massively on the forums because there is regulation. Twitter is full of ubers who didn't even watch the competition, looked up at the results and got angry about "corruption". And a lot of them have the worst of all : national bias.V/M ubers are quite something. They are scary and so many people feel obliged to compliment V/M when they say something positive about P/C. I think TSL is a case in point besides being gossips and making innuendos and thrownig shade wherever.
Also I think these ubers should be called on the abuse they are throwing towards P/C on social media or even on Gaillaguet whom I really don't like. I don't understand why he is still at the head of the FFSG but he is and it is not shoking that he supports the French team. He also is neither the first one nor the last one to do politicking.
Skate Canada doesn't have such a pristine reputation either and last year at Worlds who has been underscored in the SD ? - P/C. Who has been overscored in the FD ? V/M. Was there a French judge in the panel ? No. A Canadian one ? Yes and was that judge fair to the French ? Not exactly.
So I'm totally fed up with the hollier than thou finger pointing accusatory and denigrating crowd of V/M ubers.
And implying P/C are cheaters and won simply because Didier took things into his hands is not only absurd but utterly insulting.
Both are equal technicians. V&M have IMO the edge as far as lifts go (complex entries, complex poses and going out), but P&C do have more deep edges, being younger helping them here.I'm so used to it now itIt's to have a reassurance thing I guess ? Even though I find Kurt to like P/C a ton more than before, he told PJ Kwong he prefered their FD (Tbh, both him and Lane felt sounded more skeptical than usual right after V/M FD that I got surprised).
I'd like to have your opinion @MarieM : I rewatched both FD, without music to compare the so-called difficulty in both programs. Doing it I noticed a couple of things : Both have quite the same numbers of crossovers in transitions (the dancing part of it is different but there is nothing more difficult in one program or another), and in the feet in the step sequences, V/M have accents with head and fast arm movements (hence why it looks more difficult ?) but not the deepest edges. While I'll say V/M have acrobatic entries in lifts, P/C have the smoothest. But I didn't find the overall difficulty of one program, as superior as the other as everyone claims.
Just like with doping. Do we really believe that only the Russians are using illegal substances and are cheaters in sport ? There is a good dose of selective memory besides being willingfully blind/forgetfull on certain events.
No he's most certainly not but he projects differently than Gaby hence the fact they perfectly complement one another. For me, he expresses everything through his body movements but not so much his face, that might be why he could be described as a blank state. She expresses so many emotions through her face and also her arms. Robin Cousins said something really interesting about Guillaume: he's such an incredible talent, it just oozes from the ankle around. Basically, his body does all the talking.I do not see Guillaume as a blank state. IMO he projects just as much as Gabriella. I've seen them live both at shows and at competitions and currently one of their strengths is how even they are in their presentation and interpretation, they seem to be at the same page on what they want to achieve with their programs.
The other thing bothering me especially in TSL recap is why when talking about politics they always mention Didier but never the Canadian fed, are they supposed to be like the white sheep ? I would think politics would come from every corners come Olympics yet only Didier's name and sometimes Marina Zoueva's are talked about. Are we supposed to believe V/M are not supported and pushed by their own Fed ??? Plus Didier hasn't even been able to be elected at the head of ISU so I doubt he's that intimidating. They also systematically open the ID segment by naming Didier, every single time, it's getting ridiculous. I'm sorry but this week end P/C just skated both programs cleaner especially the SD actually, no need for Didier's intervention. Their pattern entry was mind blowing and fortunately the camera shot was perfect to understand how deep their edges are even Ben Agosto mentioned it. I also think photos capture their deep edges and matching body lines very well.
As for CBC, they're the kings of backhanded compliments. Nothing new. But they're getting a bit better than when P/C started. Maybe once V/M retire they'll acknowledge that P/C's programs to look that effortless require astounding SS and it's not easier than an all-in-your face type of choreography. Wishful thinking I know ...
I do not see Guillaume as a blank state. IMO he projects just as much as Gabriella.
Anybody remember Lance Armstrong?
Thank you very much, it was extremely interesting and I did notice it's the first year Catherine Pinard is officially listed as P/C's coach along DLH. Happy she gets the recognition she deserves. She's like an emotion birther, no wonder Gaby and Guillaume are able to dig so deep and makes us feel so much through their movements.I've found this superb small documentary of Catherine Pinard featuring P/C : https://twitter.com/CGalipeauTJ/status/940416084565401600
All about the creative process ! It's really good![]()
I've found this superb small documentary of Catherine Pinard featuring P/C : https://twitter.com/CGalipeauTJ/status/940416084565401600
All about the creative process ! It's really good![]()
Yeah, nobody would be able to skate Moonlight sonata like that. Not close. Precisely because of points below.Biased it is.
I hate partisanships in commentary.
And no I'm sorry, Tessa&Scott wouldn't be able to do the Moonlight Sonata in the same way. Because that's not where they are at this moment. That is not their strengh. I hate that they are trying to throw shade like that but we're getting used to it.
As someone who has abundantly photographed Ice Dance in the past couple of seasons I can confidently say that it's absolute nonsense. They can't hit an ugly position and that's precisely what differentiates them from other teams. The faces, the fingers, everything is absolutely on point *especially* during the lifts where others can often be seen pulling faces, having lose legs, struggling with the man "hoisting" up the female skater into whatever position. I get about 20 good P&C pictures to every 1 for other teams, and I get that part of that is they inspire me - but I know from other photographers with no horse in this race that they also have a particularly high hit rate with them.I also don't get people's comments about Gabriella having ugly positions during lifts and not stretching her legs/pointing her toes. I never noticed that and I'm really curious to see photo/video material proving that. I'm fine with being proven wrong.