I'm so used to it now it

It's to have a reassurance thing I guess ? Even though I find Kurt to like P/C a ton more than before, he told PJ Kwong he prefered their FD (Tbh, both him and Lane felt sounded more skeptical than usual right after V/M FD that I got surprised).
I'd like to have your opinion
@MarieM : I rewatched both FD,
without music to compare the so-called difficulty in both programs. Doing it I noticed a couple of things : Both have quite the same numbers of crossovers in transitions (the dancing part of it is different but there is nothing more difficult in one program or another), and in the feet in the step sequences, V/M have accents with head and fast arm movements (hence why it looks more difficult ?) but not the deepest edges. While I'll say V/M have acrobatic entries in lifts, P/C have the smoothest. But I didn't find the overall difficulty of one program, as superior as the other as everyone claims.
Both are equal technicians. V&M have IMO the edge as far as lifts go (complex entries, complex poses and going out), but P&C do have more deep edges, being younger helping them here.
Steps are about the same, but V&M are able to make you think they do more complex turns which isn't the case. They have more transitions in the SD, but I think the FD they have the same amount.
What I think is different in both teams is how they approach the sport. Tessa&Scott are amazing competitors. They've always pushed the technical enveloppe at the expense of everything else.
What they're not? They don't project as much as I'd love them to. Tessa is absolutly brilliant at projecting, but Scott never was. He's trying, but maybe way too hard this season. They've reworked the programs to put him back as the supporting partner, and IMO, it's working better.
Being older doesn't help them with the run of their blades, and it was pretty obvious in the pattern at the GPF. But IMO, two months is a long time, and they may get that easyness back by Olys.
Gabriella&Guillaume don't showcase the difficulty of what they're doing. They're aiming at something else: meshing everything in one single program so that you hardly notice the elements. But IMO, as with the canadians, it's thanks to Gabriella that those programs do work. Guillaume is kind of a blank state, and if you want to compare to Scott, he never ever does things. If Gabriella is off, the programs don't work.
I wish they'd changed at least their spin. I've seen them doing it for at least 10 years. I think their lifts are fitting their programs, but IMO if they do stay on another cycle, that's those elements they'll need to better.
They've taken the safest route with their FD, building on their strength rather than trying to reinvent themselves. IMO, that's the last year they can do that.
We are truly fortunate V&M came back to push P&C to work more and stop relying on what they do best at the detriment of Short Dances. And witnessing two teams of this caliber is a treat that we haven't had the chance to witness since Gritshuk&Platov and Krylova&Ovsiannikov retired.