Rady AM
Active Member
- Messages
- 364
Thanks for the links !
That's exactly it, they were the winners, despite not winning the title and I expect VM will be starting to realise it too!
I would put money on Gabi and Gui winning the OGM, they are taking Ice dance to a new level, something VM might well have underestimated when they planned their return!
They definitely were the winners in the sense that they performed their absolutely best in the FD, and had one of their best performances, if not the best, in the SD even despite the twizzle mistake, whereas V/M had already reached their Worlds level of performance in SD at the GP Final (apart from the level 4 in the partial step sequence), and did not have their best FD performance of the season. But, technically, both teams are winners, as one of them won the SD, and the other won the FD.That's exactly it, they were the winners, despite not winning the title and I expect VM will be starting to realise it too!
Although I am a Virtue/Moir fan, I would be more than okay with Gabriella and Guillaume winning the Olympic gold if they had the best programs and the best performances of the competition. But we don't know yet what programs both teams will have and how they will perform at Olympics. According to interviews, P/C intend to do something safer (even if they did not use the exact word), more in vein of their previous FDs for the Olympic season, but V/M want to do something different than before, even if not too different. If V/M will take a risk with something new and different, it can either hurt them a bit compared to P/C, or give them an advantage if judges will like what they do.I would put money on Gabi and Gui winning the OGM, they are taking Ice dance to a new level, something VM might well have underestimated when they planned their return!
Don't expect anything too "new and different" out of team Montreal. They best they could give V&M for the FD was their B-side material. We'll see of course, but I'm expecting something more like Latch *shudder* than something like Carmen.According to interviews, P/C intend to do something safer (even if they did not use the exact word), more in vain of their previous FDs for the Olympic season, but V/M want to do something different than before, even if not too different. If V/M will take a risk with something new and different, it can either hurt them a bit compared to P/C, or give them an advantage if judges will like what they do.
Also, what happened at Worlds with Scott was most likely a simple accident which could have happened to P/C as well (in the form of some other mistake, if not as a stumble), not so much nerves or something else. And they would have won also the FD if that stumble had not happened. With that I just want to say that we don't know what will happen at a particular competition, and there is no real basis for being sure about anything.
Well, maybe I am wrong, but, if the technical panel counted the stumble as having happened still on the step sequence, then it means they would have gotten level 4 for it without the stumble. That's 1.5 points + at least 2 more points in GOE (looking at what they were normally getting for that step sequence before Worlds). Possibly also the PCS would have been slightly higher than it was. That's 116.19 + 3.5 points = 119.69 points + possibly just a little bit in PCS. It's only some tenths of a point more than what P/C got, but still more. As I said, perhaps I am wrong and V/M would not have gotten level 4 for their step sequence also without the stumble. I should have said "probably they would have won also the FD". Still, it's very likely.How do you conclude V/M would have won the FD if Scott had not stumbled?
Also, what happened at Worlds with Scott was most likely a simple accident which could have happened to P/C as well
The result would have been embarrassing... The P/C's free was exceptional.Well, maybe I am wrong, but, if the technical panel counted the stumble as having happened still on the step sequence, then it means they would have gotten level 4 for it without the stumble. That's 1.5 points + at least 2 more points in GOE (looking at what they were normally getting for that step sequence before Worlds). Possibly also the PCS would have been slightly higher than it was. That's 116.19 + 3.5 points = 119.69 points + possibly just a little bit in PCS. It's only some tenths of a point more than what P/C got, but still more. As I said, perhaps I am wrong and V/M would not have gotten level 4 for their step sequence also without the stumble. I should have said "probably they would have won also the FD". Still, it's very likely.
Philip Hersh wrote a piece for Icenetwork where he has some lovely words about Gaby and Guillaume's performance:
"Legendary Russian pairs coach Tamara Moskvina likes to cite this proverb: "Some like the preacher, some like the preacher's wife, and some like the preacher's daughter."
The meaning behind that proverb, that taste is individual, always seems best applied to ice dance.
So it was in Helsinki, where the power and passion of Canadians Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir barely prevailed over the refinement and subtlety of France's Gabriella Papadakis and Guillaume Cizeron.
Minor flaws in the French team's short dance dug them a hole too deep to climb out of despite a winning free dance of truthfully Ode-on-a-Grecian-Urn beauty.
Yes, I understand and appreciate the technically based judging system has given dance some sporting chops instead of it being viewed as more of an entertaining sideshow. In my mind, though, Papadakis and Cizeron deserved even bigger scores for having unmatched, riveting and utterly breathtaking qualities in the free dance.
With no jumps, dance has a bigger entertainment aspect than any of the sport's other disciplines. Shouldn't there have been a goosebumps bonus for the final 90 seconds of the French couple's free dance? "
I like the idea of a goosebump PCS, fans are already going crazy about politicking and backdoors conspiracy, this could take it to another level
Let it be a lesson for PC : work on those damn step sequences!!!!!
They should know why they were not level 4. In l'Equipe (today), Guillaume said: "We know that we were not perfect, and that we could have done better ... we also know that sometimes between a level 3 or 4, there is a certain subjectivity"
Well it seems a lot of people think 5+ pts was an "undeserved" gap haha... Especially when P/C had a free skate like this, it's just a pity that nothing would have been good enough to take over VM. IMO there's a bigger difference in quality betwwen the two FDs than between the two SDs.. BUT like he said, PC technical errors were more costly.
Oh well, I guess this competition is a sign that the skating gods want to keep us on the edge of our seats until the olympics!!
Let it be a lesson for PC : work on those damn step sequences!!!!!
J
I'm sure they will. . But let the judges work hard as well. An element given a GOE from -2 to +3 by 9 judges at the same event is unacceptable, unfair to the skaters and fans, as well. If this happened at the Olympics next year, whoa....the ice dance competition will be more popular than ever.
And they don't even have a quad!Philip Hersh wrote a piece for Icenetwork where he has some lovely words about Gaby and Guillaume's performance
For the frenchies out there or people speaking french you can listen to the radio program mentioned above here, it starts at 42m19s
http://www.rtl.fr/actu/societe-faits-divers/rtl-grand-soir-du-03-avril-2017-7787938956
Yes I mean do we know if the level 3 VM got for that step sequence was a consequence of the stumble? I thought it wasn't because a lot of people insisted that his stumble wasn't a part of the element. BUT with judges giving from -2 to +3 you have to wonder. I hope it will result in a discussion among the judges about their judging system... lol
I'm thrilled by this news, it shows they understand this season mistake of starting the season way to late and unprepared. They paid it dearly, plus Olympic season is shorter so not time for galas and WTT. I hope they'll enlist in an early B-competition outside France to get early feed-back this time around.Gabriella and Guillaume will not skate at World Team trophy.
https://ffsg.org/evenement/isu-world-team-trophy-tokyo-jap/
I would have liked to see their programs again but it is better for them, they will be able to rest a bit before resuming training for the Olympic season
Yes sometimes it depends on how the rule is interpreted by the tech panel... This "grey" zone is absurd imo because how can you work on your levels if you don't know what will cost you?