While I agree they should have been third, the technical score that was in the corner of the screen is not what they got in the end, after the review they dropped 3-4 points in TES.
Yeah, I was confused by that when I looked at the ISU results page and saw that D/R were barely ahead of J/C. Then when I watched D/R's sp again to try and appreciate the positives, I wondered why I was seeing 77+ with D/R landing just percentage points behind S/M. I thought, why did I think they were closer to J/C? I mean when was it announced that a review had been undertaken? Never? Geesh. It makes the scoring look even more suspicious that a further review happened after the kiss 'n cry reveal.
Anyway, S/M's score was too high as well. I think J/C deserved at least a point higher, with D/R slightly behind them, as I said earlier. And S/M only about 75+ or 76 even realistically, because S/M have flaws that haven't been fully worked out.
Dave Lease is certifiable, but then he does often say some things that make sense. For example, it's a crime that Tarasova/Morosov have such great skating skills but lack connection on the ice and usually have terrible programs. Their Candyman music and fp really really needs to disappear into candy land and get lost forever. On TSL, Dave and Jonathan were fairly accurate in their assessment of that horrendous fp. The elements are sublime, but why must we be subjected to such a mess of choreo and music selection? The judges seriously need to take off points for T/M's composition and interpretation marks especially. Why do they just keep on being handed gift points for terrible programs?
If S/M could get it together and skate clean, and if Bruno could master German, they might be able to go to the Olympics and really make a strong effort to win OGM. I don't care much for Sui/Han's programs this year. They might be better off bringing back their last year's programs which they didn't use much, and perhaps make a stronger case for Olympic dominance in pairs. Peng/Jin appear to need more time for growth. I'm really not enamored of watching Yu/Zhang. Nice tricks when they are on, but no connection at all, and no comfort level. The disconnect hampers them as a pair.
Interestingly, at the tail end of his RC review, Dave waxed nostalgic about some former pairs programs by U.S. teams worth watching again. I agree with his suggestions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59A5vL1WvDQ Oh my, I remember -- Tiffany was so very lovely; why didn't something happen for her at the very least? She was indeed special! 1998 Stieglers'
Romeo & Juliet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvp96fqlRTk What a boss program. I have never forgotten this program choreographed by Peter Oppegard for Stiegler/Zimmerman 1997 U.S. Nats
The Sorcerer's Apprentice
Now that program is something that Tarasova/Morosov should be thinking more along the lines of, no?! I mean seriously get creative and innovative. Tell a story that helps Evgenia and Vlad to connect better. Why is it so hard for them to be more creative and judicious in their choice of music and choreo? With all the wonderful choreographers out here today, why are they so stuck in such a bad rut?
Maybe John Z and/or Peter O should think about bringing this program back for an up-and-coming U.S. pair team! For Calalang/Sidhu or Deardorff/Settlage. Or perhaps even for Denney/Frazier. Why not?