pat c
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,787
But he can, possibly just not in the US.According to Brennan's article, all the complainant wants to accomplish is to prevent him from coaching. If he never coaches again, dayenu!
But he can, possibly just not in the US.According to Brennan's article, all the complainant wants to accomplish is to prevent him from coaching. If he never coaches again, dayenu!
Depending on how the case turns out, National governing bodies could also ban him from coaching.But he can, possibly just not in the US.
The complaint may lead to a ban in Canada. As a practical matter, even without a formal ban enforceable elsewhere, his prospects would be limited. His reputation would precede him.But he can, possibly just not in the US.
Hah, just what I need. Another cause to get caught up in. And yes, an international safesport body would be a huge undertaking requiring cooperation from a number of parties who likely won't want to cooperate. But a goddess can dream. And this thread has prompted me to donate to Gymnasts for Change who have been at forefront of speaking up for women athletes and advocating against abuse in Canadian sport.Not to be unkind or put any burden on you specifically, but that will take a rather large effort of athletes and other interested parties to lobby for and demand for that to be accomplished. Instead of (or in addition to) complaining here about this specific allegation, perhaps such energy and passion should be spent actively engaged in that effort, as difficult as that may be.
You would think so.The complaint may lead to a ban in Canada. As a practical matter, even without a formal ban enforceable elsewhere, his prospects would be limited. His reputation would precede him.
Which is the point. Regardless of what happens to the complaint, his coaching prospects have dimmed, and they will dim further if the he loses.You would think so.
And yet, parents are lined up around the block to send their athlete kids to be coached by coaches with known abusive behaviour.
It wouldn’t be me though with my kid.
Yeah I know but they no longer get all the hockey. 2 days before NYE CBC announced they were cutting traditional coverage of festivities and celebrations throughout city/provinces. I personally don’t watch television coverage but CBC is largely funded by government due to Cdn content. Figure skating is important to fans here but .. they need to get rid of her. She was moved down to an interim position at some point before this too. Anyways .. complicated there’s moe to it but ….it’s also a very political decision to cut funding.Yes, it's true that CBC has had to face budget cuts, but that does not excuse CBC Sports from completely cutting all figure skating TV coverage.
Canada is a top country in figure skating and we always got TV coverage of major events before. To not even have any TV coverage of Canadian Nationals or a World Championships taking place here in Canada is unacceptable.
CBC Sports gives hours and hours of TV coverage to hockey and other sports, so you think they could at least spare a few hours for TV coverage for figure skating.
My point is that I don’t think there will be a shortage of coaching work for him unfortunately unless there is a ban because most parents don’t seem to care as long as they think their child will be “a champion.”Which is the point. Regardless of what happens to the complaint, his coaching prospects have dimmed, and they will dim further if the he loses.
We live in an imperfect world, but loss of earning potential for him and further healing for her is probably the best achievable outcome here.
The majority of parents would react as you and you’re not a helicopter mom.My point is that I don’t think there will be a shortage of coaching work for him unfortunately unless there is a ban because most parents don’t seem to care as long as they think their child will be “a champion.”
Everyone calls me a helicopter parent so my response is not a good one to go by.
For the benefit of this uneducated, rude person in the lower 48, who is "her"?Yeah I know but they no longer get all the hockey. 2 days before NYE CBC announced they were cutting traditional coverage of festivities and celebrations throughout city/provinces. I personally don’t watch television coverage but CBC is largely funded by government due to Cdn content. Figure skating is important to fans here but .. they need to get rid of her. She was moved down to an interim position at some point before this too. Anyways .. complicated there’s moe to it but ….it’s also a very political decision to cut funding.
I think she means the controversial head of the CBC, Catherine Tait.For the benefit of this uneducated, rude person in the lower 48, who is "her"?
You're not a helicopter parent.My point is that I don’t think there will be a shortage of coaching work for him unfortunately unless there is a ban because most parents don’t seem to care as long as they think their child will be “a champion.”
Everyone calls me a helicopter parent so my response is not a good one to go by.
Ok thanks for the context.I think she means the controversial head of the CBC, Catherine Tait.
Rape is assault and violence. What happens when someone is accused of a violent attack?
Are they allowed to continue to work until a trial? Are they allowed to interact with potential victims? (I really don't know)
I couldn’t disagree with you more.While I agree it was best for them to withdraw, Laurence should be ready for all of the hate.
Yes, maybe she does know him as a "man of integrity, respect and kindness," but do you really think it's a good idea to go that route in your statement. People are two-faced - so I could totally believe she only knows him as a nice person. But she does realize that it makes it sound like she is discounting the survivor, right?
I´m happy they WD for the sake of the other athletes, but it surely with a bad taste in the mouth reading Nikolaj claiming the allegations are false and he is going to prove it and Laurence indirectly saying she believes him in the statement.
It´s like they are trying to build image to be caring people choosing to WD because of the others athletes...
At the end of day, clearly Laurence does believe him (or is trying to; no real point in trying to guess her exact mindset), since she is still with him — both personally and professionally. I think everyone would assume that by her conduct. I don’t think she loses anything by saying as much.While I agree it was best for them to withdraw, Laurence should be ready for all of the hate.
Yes, maybe she does know him as a "man of integrity, respect and kindness," but do you really think it's a good idea to go that route in your statement. People are two-faced - so I could totally believe she only knows him as a nice person. But she does realize that it makes it sound like she is discounting the survivor, right?
Yeah it´s not really surprising considering their relationship but it´s seems unwise. She could have left that sentence out. Say something about that they wait for the investigation to be done or something and that the investigation would serve justice or something.At the end of day, clearly Laurence does believe him (or is trying to; no real point in trying to guess her exact mindset), since she is still with him — both personally and professionally. I think everyone would assume that by her conduct. I don’t think she loses anything by saying as much.
Not really surprising, either, given that she has invested ten years of her life plus her plans for her future in Nikolaj. That’s not something people will easily walk away from, generally.
Well she sort of said that as well..Yeah it´s not really surprising considering their relationship but it´s seems unwise. She could have left that sentence out. Say something about that they wait for the investigation to be done or something and that the investigation would serve justice or something.
Yep, whether or not SC asked them to WD, these statements are carefully crafted to make Nik into a sympathetic figure.It´s like they are trying to build image to be caring people choosing to WD because of the others athletes...
Exactly my point. Regardless of what you think about everything else - due process and all that - it is received very, very poorly when you discount any victim's statements. And while the rest of the statement was fine, that one particular sentence is going to get her a lot of hate.Yeah it´s not really surprising considering their relationship but it´s seems unwise. She could have left that sentence out. Say something about that they wait for the investigation to be done or something and that the investigation would serve justice or something.
This where it may get ugly for the accuser, if people seem to rally around the accused.Yep, whether or not SC asked them to WD, these statements are carefully crafted to make Nik into a sympathetic figure.
And I see Guillaume has liked both posts. Given the response to the allegations against Coughlin and others, I suspect most in IAM are aligned with Laurence's statement.
An important point which is often overlookedThis where it may get ugly for the accuser, if people seem to rally around the accused.
Anyone who believes there should be due process for the accused should also believe there should be due process for the accuser and hold their tongues until the process is finished.