But this is not Zagitova's situation... you are bringing Lipnitskaya in as an example is not relevant because Zagitova is not struggling with an eating disorder. If this repeats again, then you might have a point.
Lipnitskaya is relevant because she's an example of Eteri girl who couldn't continue skating even though she wanted, due to bad basic technique. Same as Zagitova. Both are examples of Tutberidze's students. In addition Lipnitskaya had an eating disorder as the result of trying to maintain her skating career with inadequate technique. She's not the only one who tried to postpone puberty, but she's the only one who's case is public. Zagitova doesn't try to maintain anything, she retired.
Oh great... the Eteri technique mantra again.
Actually at test skates it was remarked her jumps were higher and had better rotation than last year... but now that she has had some not so great competitions with UR's we have an excuse to go back to saying her technique is poor.
She was criticized for improper technique all her very short career. It worked while she was small, it stopped working the moment she got a bit bigger. It's not the Eteri technique mantra, it's a fact. Anyone who has a half idea about skating sees it, regardless of nationality, personal preferences or love of Zagitova. This has been said countless times not just by posters here, whose credentials really are unknown, but also by countless coaches, officials and commentators. Yes, it brings medals. Yes, bad technique can bring medals. Yes, Eteri's girls deserved most if not all the medals they have ever won. No, it doesn't make the technique any less horrible. No, still none of them survived the puberty.
Just because someone has had UR's in competitions doesn't mean it's a fundamental technique problem as it is with Miyahara. But of course now that we probably won't have a chance to see you are going to say she is gone because her technique hasn't lasted
Zagitova
did just win Worlds with her post-pubescent body in 2019. I know... now you are probably going to say she should have received a ton of carrots and she didn't because, you know, Olympic Champion bonus...
Miyahara also has a serious problem with technique. A different kind of problem, but still, her jumping technique is very bad. And like Zagitova she also manages to rotate only when she's at a particular weight (low) and only due to her very fast rotation in the air due to nearly boyish figure.
Zagitova probably won the Worlds fair, I don't recall what I thought about the underrotations then. No, she didn't have her post-pubescent body in 2019. She's considerably taller and bigger now (and more powerful, btw). And yes, Olympic Champion bonus. She didn't have a single good competition last season apart from the worlds, so I think it is a good showcase that her technique is unmaintainable in the long run. I don't want to speculate how exactly she managed to make it work for the worlds, but I have my guess, and I suppose we all do. This probably can't work anymore because she got even taller and heavier this year.
Sotnikova had a wonderful technique? In what universe?
In this. She had a take-off edge problem, but other than this her jumps were high, powerful, she had great basics, speed and off ice training. She also had a consistency problem and terrible programs.
Out of Tutberidze's girls of the last decade only Tsurskaya and Kostornaya have comparable basics, and both learned it before arriving to her group.
How many generations of students (who actually stayed) has Tutberidze actually had a chance to work with past puberty?
Once again, the fact is a large percentage of Russian skaters in general are not continuing past 17... but for some reason you to choose to be focusing on exclusively Tutberidze school.
Heh. That's rich.
So do you imply that the only reason why all those Shelepens, Lipnitskayas, Panenkovas and so on couldn't survive the puberty BECAUSE they didn't let Tutberidze fix their technique she herself gave them when they were little girls? I mean, I am trying to follow the thread of thought here.... So she knows how to teach two different techniques, one for the little girls, and one for the grown ups, and it's expected that once they reach 17, she just reteaches them the other kind? Is that how in your opinion skating works?
As for the rest, again, many girls in all groups and all countries don't continue past 17. But the fact is that Tutberidze is the only one who doesn't have a SINGLE girl out of literally dozens who managed to do so. Mishin had 2-3 girls, one is still skating. Buyanova had 4-5 girls, some 3 out of them survived the puberty. Eteri had some 20 girls in the last 8 years who reached the high level at the age of 13-15, and ZERO of them managed to have a career of more than 3 senior years. Do you see the problem?
ETA: To be clear, I think you're fighting the wrong fight. No one ever has said that Tutberidze's girls have good jumping technique. That is not the debate at all. Neither no one says her girls don't deserve the medals. The basic point of argument is whether it's a bad thing that prepubescent girls with bad jumping technique win everything or is the only thing that matters is the fact that they win.