Lubov/Dylan were also 4th out of the 4 teams on the Season's Best list with no Grand Prix medals this season. I can't see a Body of Work scenario that could have worked in their favour with a 4th place Nationals result even if incorporating 2017 Worlds/Four Continents results.
Canadian Olympic Figure Skating Team Announced; also World/4CC/Junior World teams
- Thread starter Sylvia
- Start date
Habs
A bitch from Canada
- Messages
- 6,239
I'm curious to know who isn't going to the Olympics that you feel deserves to be there. I certainly didn't see anything that deserves a "monkeying with some of the marks" comment. Besides national inflation, there doesn't appear to be any judging that was out of line with performances. YMMV.
ChiquitaBanana
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,034
That never ever came into consideration in their switch.
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
The BOW argument is that they were the highest-ranked Canadian Pairs team at 2017 Worlds and Canada wouldn't have three spots without their result in Helsinki.
ChiquitaBanana
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,034
BOW : so much can apply for it. One can have a stellar season and a dismal one the year after. I feel it,s like a baseball player. They might be the best hitter the season before, but they sometimes get caught into a lethargy... Had I/M had an exceptional GP season and skated the way they did at Nationals, they could have had a case... but it was not and the other teams are too close in terms of skills that it would be unfair not to send MT/M. Let say Ruest/Wolfe had the skate of their life and came in 3rd in front of I/M : they would have sent I/M imo.
Olympics are so close to Nationals, you want to see skaters ready to go.
Olympics are so close to Nationals, you want to see skaters ready to go.
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
I'm not saying they should have selected I/M based on Worlds 2017. I'm saying there was a reasonable argument based on the most important international event that any Pair but D/R competed in and with Olympic spots at stake and with an injured Radford, which put the third spot at risk.
That's not no BOW argument. It wasn't compelling enough, clearly.
That's not no BOW argument. It wasn't compelling enough, clearly.
barbarafan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,306
and MTM2 had zero results in 2016/2017 due to her concussion. So they did nationals healthy this yr and IM were injured.
vesperholly
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,826
MT/M were 3rd at Canadians and 7th at 4CC last year. They only missed fall 2016 events.
I'm gutted for I/M but they were something like 20 points behind MT/M at Nationals.
barbarafan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,306
back to the fact that I/M were marked down by judges...They were 3rd at nationals last year as SB did not compete as they were injured and I/M came 3rd at 4CC last yr.
ChiquitaBanana
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,034
Yes, you are right. I am curious as well to understand fully what is your oinion on this topic. They are few names missing in your before-last post so I am confused as whom you think should have made the team.
jmtfti
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 190
The fact is there's also no compelling argument against MT/M based on overall results (beyond the strict recent BOW scope), once you discount the rough start. They were able to finish 8th at 2016 Worlds in their second year together, a high enough finish that even absent a 7th place I/M, Canada still would have retained its third spot. This season MT/M also won US Classic and medaled at Cup of China; I/M have zero fall 2017 hardware. Tracking season scores for TFTI, I had an inkling of what may happen when I/M were largely stuck in fourth among the pairs.
The pairs event was a difficult one, to see Canada's arguable second-best pair continue to struggle as they have this season, rather than finally return to the form of which they're capable. I'm still sad by the way things transpired. But there's not a great argument that I/M, given their inconsistencies this season, would be more useful to the team event than the now-healthy S/B if Canada chooses to use two pairs, and based strictly on Nationals results, even if one team may have been underscored or another overscored in PCS, I can't quibble with the actual placements based on what was executed.
The pairs event was a difficult one, to see Canada's arguable second-best pair continue to struggle as they have this season, rather than finally return to the form of which they're capable. I'm still sad by the way things transpired. But there's not a great argument that I/M, given their inconsistencies this season, would be more useful to the team event than the now-healthy S/B if Canada chooses to use two pairs, and based strictly on Nationals results, even if one team may have been underscored or another overscored in PCS, I can't quibble with the actual placements based on what was executed.
barbarafan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,306
my opinion is Skate Canada is full of sh**it
They have been saying for 2 days that it is a nationals decision, yet the formal announcement says they are supposed to use 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 and then nationals.I guess they did not think to change the criteria in the announcement on the skate canada site. https://skatecanada.ca/2018/01/canadian-figure-skating-team-named-for-pyeongchang-2018/....Based on who they wanted on the team the judges played with the scores...that is why there is such a large gap.
So D/R and S/B there is no question they should be named to team.
Not so straight forward for the 3rd place.
That is my opinion.
4rkidz
plotting, planning and travelling
- Messages
- 14,689
The Judges didn’t have to “play” with the scores, the skaters did that themselves.
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
It was sad to see I/M struggle, but they did.
Habs
A bitch from Canada
- Messages
- 6,239
It was pretty straight forward. And I say that as an I&M uber.
aftershocks
Banned Member
- Messages
- 17,317
Obviously. As I mentioned in my post #120, I took further I/M discussion to Cdn pairs thread, but the opining has willfully continued over here for some random and/or cantankerous reasoning.
Last edited:
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
In terms of skating skills, there's no question in my mind for the 3rd Women's spot.
mag
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,198
Who would that be?
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
Austman over Chartrand. I think they made the right choice.
mag
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,198
I too think they made the right choice. I would have been annoyed if she was held up as I know she is a SC favourite. She wasn’t held up any more than anyone else and less than some, she fought through the LP and she absolutely deserves the spot. That said, I don’t think Austman has particularly good Skating Skills for her level and I am fairly sure she will not get an 8.00 internationally
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
On the other hand, she doesn't deserve a 5 in SS.
She has no renowned coach, she was last at SC, and she's only learned her hardest jumps in the last couple of years. Not the profile to get extra favors from SC.
She has no renowned coach, she was last at SC, and she's only learned her hardest jumps in the last couple of years. Not the profile to get extra favors from SC.
Skate Talker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,143
Yay - PJ is going to do the arena announcing at the Olys again - she mentions this at the end of her Weaver Poje interview after the Oly team presentation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBqwxfAhHZY
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
Aren't Kwong's children Korean through their dad? I wonder if any of them will be able to join her.
aftershocks
Banned Member
- Messages
- 17,317
Oh well, I'll join the continued fray in this thread. You like Austman's skating skills over Chartrand's, or over Chartrand's as well as over all the other Cdn ladies below the top two?
While I don't really follow Cdn ladies beyond the top two, I did watch the ladies performances at Cdn Nationals. Both Austman and Chartrand struggled, although Chartrand's difficulties appear to be emotional or something other than a lack of ability. Chartrand was just unable to get herself back to form technically. Her confidence appears to have taken a huge hit for the past several seasons.
In Austman's case, she has a very nice look on the ice, but I don't think her technical abilities surpass Chartrand's, it's just that Chartrand is not skating the way she can, sadly for her. Austman may have relatively better skating skills than many of the other ladies beyond the top two, and she clearly has a different style than Chartrand that some may find more engaging. However, it was so obvious that Austman had to work hard to stay on her feet with many of those jumps. It's just that Austman's huge desire won out and she landed enough technically to eke past the rest for the third spot.
I doubt Austman is going to fare that well among the international field with her current technical arsenal, but gaining the experience will mean a lot. Skate Canada find themselves in the exceedingly lucky position for their ladies division in having two of the best ladies skaters in the world, which will allow them the advantage of grooming a third lady at major international competitions (something that's been unheard of for Canada in decades). Gabby Daleman improving so much in recent years and coming on strong as a topflight contender, along with Kaetlyn Osmond recovering from injury and building back to top form has meant quite literally the Worlds ladies podium for Canada. We shall see what happens at the Olympics. Ladies with huge talent will be fighting with a similar grit that Austman displayed to make the Cdn team, but also with even more determination and skill equal in some aspects and arguably surpassing in other aspects to that of Daleman and Osmond.
I hope skaters in all the disciplines will perform in ways that will make it very hard for the judges at Olympics and Worlds.
Except I am not looking forward to seeing hide nor hair (make that black spots on a yellow background) of Tarasova/Morosov's bleh and 
free program.
Last edited:
Coco
Rotating while Russian!
- Messages
- 18,571
You can make an argument for either Alaine or Larkin but I think Skate Canada made a wise choice because now all the other up and coming skaters can see that competitiveness is more important than talent, within reason. That's a great message to send.
That said, I don’t think Austman has particularly good Skating Skills for her level and I am fairly sure she will not get an 8.00 internationally
I'm not as critical, but it must be noted that even at a comparatively smaller event like Nepela earlier in the season, Larkyn looked so tense and had her shoulders rather stiff and hunched throughout her programs. Hopefully, this accomplishment will get her to relax a little more.
aftershocks
Banned Member
- Messages
- 17,317
^^ Yes, the pressure especially on both Tamura and Austman was very intense, each knowing the high stakes of making the Olympic team. Both faltered, but Tamura ultimately imploded, plus Tamura still has the look of a junior.
Last edited:
kwanfan1818
RIP D-10
- Messages
- 37,740
She looked more relaxed here than at Skate Canada. Experience must be helping her.
I hope she has a blast in Korea!
I hope she has a blast in Korea!
mag
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,198
None the less she has. She doesn’t need a renown coach, she has a very well connected family. She is the only female skater, as far as I have been able to find, who has been given an international in the past 2 years, who does not have a 3/3 in the short and long. The fact that she was given Skate Canada over Alicia Pineault after Austman’s usual meltdown at Nepela defies explanation. Would Nationals have been different if Alicia had got that assignment? Obviously we will never know.
I say all this not because she shouldn’t be on the team. She absolutely should be. She went to Nationals and won her spot with sheer grit and determination. But because there have been a number of “oh how hard it has been” stories in the local media which, IMHO, are long on drama and short on truth.
Users who are viewing this thread
Similar threads
