Habs
A bitch from Canada
- Messages
- 6,239
I don't think wild and outrageous are the right words. More like arrogant, stuffy, and stodgy.Is William all that wild or outrageous that he needs to mellow out?
I don't think wild and outrageous are the right words. More like arrogant, stuffy, and stodgy.Is William all that wild or outrageous that he needs to mellow out?
Those are generally not qualities that improve with age either.I don't think wild and outrageous are the right words. More like arrogant, stuffy, and stodgy.
Obvious in what way?
I think the Caribbean tour was such a disaster bc W&K seemed so scared of the people. They would only shake hands through a fence, have a parade standing in an armored car, and only light skinned ppl greeted them at every engagement. That fear was obvious.
None of this is true.They would only shake hands through a fence, have a parade standing in an armored car, and only light skinned ppl greeted them at every engagement.
I would add intense and trying to prove a point which would hopefully mellow with age.I don't think wild and outrageous are the right words. More like arrogant, stuffy, and stodgy.
None of this is true.
That case was about hiring practices in the 60s. Just exactly when do you think William and Kate were born?Buckingham Palace banned black people from even working in the palace:
Buckingham Palace banned ethnic minorities from office roles, papers reveal
Exclusive: Documents also shed light on Queen’s ongoing exemption from race and sex discrimination lawswww.theguardian.com
That case was about hiring practices in the 60s. Just exactly when do you think William and Kate were born?
I am sure they aren't around a lot of Black people but you don't do your argument any favors with these easily disproved exaggerations.
So in fact there are minorities working for the BRFAccording to the most recent stats, only 8.5% of BP workers are minorities:
Sure. There is also "talk" that Lilibet isn't real. Talk is talk.There's also talk that W&K deliberately prevented their children from seeing Lilibet this trip.
It is not. Two minutes on google will bring up many examples of Kate and William happily, comfortably interacting with people of color on the tour, without armored cars or fences between them. Bad optics on tour - yes. Fear and avoidance of black people - no.It is all very true.
I'm going to venture a guess that between their time at St. Andrews and William's service in the military, the Cambridges have been among people who are not white aristocrats.If you think about it, neither of them have probably ever been around black people. They both went to extremely elite, white boarding schools. They live among extremely elite, white aristocrats.
The optics were problematic in a number of cases and as I've said the brf need to sort themselves out. But that does not equate to any evidence of W&K being scared.It is all very true. There were numerous articles about how disastrous the tour was and how horrible the optics were of the engagements W&K chose.
If you think about it, neither of them have probably ever been around black people. They both went to extremely elite, white boarding schools. They live among extremely elite, white aristocrats.
Buckingham Palace banned black people from even working in the palace:
Buckingham Palace banned ethnic minorities from office roles, papers reveal
Exclusive: Documents also shed light on Queen’s ongoing exemption from race and sex discrimination lawswww.theguardian.com
Neither of those institutions perform especially well terms of ethnic representation. And the RF as an employer is below both of those (although the data wasn't all from the same year). St Andrews was actually better than I expected and the military worst.I'm going to venture a guess that between their time at St. Andrews and William's service in the military, the Cambridges have been among people who are not white aristocrats.
There's a lot of stuff about William that seems to be grounded in gossip and assumptions rather than concrete, verified reporting.
In Germany, that is "reported" by the same "magazine" that "reported" that Victoria and Daniel are getting divorced a few days ago. ...There's also talk that W&K deliberately prevented their children from seeing Lilibet this trip.
My mom and I are/were both blondes, but nowhere in either side of her family (or my dad's) are there natural blondes. I think that her Scottish father's family's red hair and her Italian mother's family's brown hair somehow cancelled each other out to create us, the only 2 natural blondes in the entire family. I always wanted to have red hair, but with zero red pigmentation my hair just will not hold red. When I've gotten red highlights done (professionally) they turn blonde within a couple of weeks. So it's not worth the $ to maintain red, as much as I covet it.I'm a bit surprised that both children are red heads. A friend told me that she hoped her child would be a red head as red heads are dying out because the genes are recessive. Either she was mistaken or it has something to do with who traits are passed on from.
Despite our natural colour, my mom and I are the same. My hair now is somewhere between dark blonde and brown. I call it 'literally dirty blonde' because without any colour in it, it just looks greasy. And my mom keeps wanting her hair to turn grey, but instead it keeps getting darker.And highly unusual. Her hair looks like it will get darker as she gets older, though.
And Sweden's Princess Madeleine married an American Banker who refused Swedish titles and citizenship (I remember reading somewhere it's speculated that he refused the citizenship and titles as he would have to disclose or close his off-shore accounts? Something sort of 'scandalous' along those lines). And not as scandalous, but their father, King Carl Gustaf, married a German interpreter he met at the Munich Olympics. Considering his father married his second cousin, and his father kept it in the royal family by marrying one of Queen Victoria's kids, it's nice to see the more recent generations breaking the general marriage traditions and marrying 'commoners' for love.Um, Princess Martha Louise of Norway just got engaged:
Princess Märtha Louise of Norway and Shaman Durek Are Engaged: 'The One Who Makes My Heart Skip'
Princess Märtha Louise of Norway and Shaman Durek have announced their engagement after confirming their relationship in May 2019people.com
ETA: I also feel obliged to note that Crown Prince Haakon of Norway married a single mom with a partying past, Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden married her personal trainer, her brother married a former glamour model/reality TV contestant, and Queen Maxima of the Netherlands couldn't have her father at her wedding because he was a minister in Argentina's junta government. That's not at all boring!
There's also talk that W&K deliberately prevented their children from seeing Lilibet this trip.
I've read many articles that said W&K did not let their kids meet the Sussexes this trip.Are you presenting that as some kind of proof of racism? Because if it's true maybe it's just because the brothers are not getting along. Not "must keep the white kids away from the part-black kids".
I've read many articles that said W&K did not let their kids meet the Sussexes this trip.
That never occurred to me. I thought it was because they are still angry.I would believe or not believe those articles depending on the source. But even if they didn't, that's not proof that W&K are racist.
This is the post upthread that I was responding to. https://www.fsuniverse.net/forum/th...y-everything-harry-meghan.107123/post-6264897That never occurred to me. I thought it was because they are still angry.
The OP said they weren't allowed to meet Lilibet. Which I found sus. Why just her?I've read many articles that said W&K did not let their kids meet the Sussexes this trip.
I think they’ll resolve it at some point. I don’t believe it’s mortal. Families need to work out their own stuff. Even royalty.I think the trust between Harry/William was mortally damaged by the Oprah interview. And I can't blame William for keeping his distance in case any interaction between the brothers ends up in another interview or in Harry's upcoming book.
I was thrilled when Harry married Meg but they lost me when they did the Oprah tell-all. The situation makes me sad, though.
In the give and take of relinquishing their role as working royals representing the Queen, Meghan gained the ability (if that is the right word) to speak out on issues that are important to her, something I assume she greatly values. Also of note, she has received such a large platform from which to be heard as a result of marrying into the BRF, not because she was an American actress. I think Harry and Meghan can live their own lives and truly be voices for good if they turn their focus away from family politics and resist the media's who slighted who game and speak out judiciously on matters they care about.Meghan and Gloria Steinem were interviewed by British Vogue about the recent Supreme Court decision on abortion. https://www.vogue.co.uk/arts-and-lifestyle/article/meghan-markle-gloria-steinem-abortion-rights