Vagabond
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,479
Does Kwan still get tested? Or did I miss the retirement announcement?
Does Kwan still get tested? Or did I miss the retirement announcement?
That first part is not true. Russia is not banned from ISU and other international competitions for doping but because iof the war.Well, yes, it makes perfectly good sense. They are banned for two reasons: 1) the doping violations, and 2) the invasion of Ukraine. So, it is possible for one of the reasons for banning to resolve itself while the other remains unresolved. The Russian Athletics Federation (oversees their track & field disciplines) could have, indeed, made good progress toward changing the culture within their sports toward doping, as well as instituted the necessary measures required to lift the ban, and thus merit reinstatement on those grounds. That, in and of itself, is a completely separate issue from their government's invasion of Ukraine, and if the doping-related ban were lifted it would put RusAF in the same boat as the rest of their sports feds who are banned from international competitions due to the war.
As it is, the headline is a bit clickbait-y since in the body of the article, it makes it clear that there are still points RusAF needs to implement in order to lift the doping-related ban. So, who really knows what is going to happen with RusAF.
Excuse me, but I was responding to the questions specifically about RusAF. RusAF is banned from international competitions by World Athletics (IAAF) for two reasons - 1) doping violations, 2) the war in Ukraine. The doping ban from IAAF can be lifted without lifting the ban for the war.That first part is not true. Russia is not banned from ISU and other international competitions for doping but because iof the war.
The doping ban only affects the Olympics in 2021 and 2022 where the Russians were allowed to take part as individuals from Russia though.The Olympic ban was first for 4 years but reduced by CAS to 2 years.
The International Paralympic Committee vote to ban the Russian and Belarus Olympic Committees was decided by a decisive margin. It defies reason why the IOC is not following suit.
Does the Paralympic Committee not need money?Cabaret | "Money" Musical Number | Warner Bros. Entertainment
Cabaret available on Blu-ray, place your order at Warner Bros Shop 2/5/2013 http://bit.ly/VQu4ubLiza Minnelli stars in this musical extravaganza set in a Ber...www.youtube.com
Perhaps the participants and their representatives are not so corrupt and self-serving and venal as those of the broader and more well-established IOC and its participating members.Does the Paralympic Committee not need money?
Both of the times Tiff has been back to Moscow since March, RUSADA appeared the morning after her arrival.For them to test Zagorski, they would have to have kept track of where she was, since, per her Instagram, she's travelled extensively (Australia, France, UK). If the rules are the same as when Kostner's ex-boyfriend was competing and under the Italian version of RUSADA, she'd have to have kept RUSADA informed of all of her movements, and if she wasn't in Russia, would have had to have arranged for her testing abroad or have waited for her to return to Russia, if she has in between travels. So it would have taken effort on their part, even if selection is truly random.
Then she's too immature to compete internationally.Even if she did have suspicions, I seriously doubt that she would feel she could say "no" to a very powerful coach and a very powerful federation. Especially one that churns out baby prodigies and then tosses them aside as soon as they can't perform at the level they used to.
Then she's too immature to compete internationally.
It seems that a lot of figure skating fans aren't ready to have a conversation about the power imbalances and abuse that goes on in this sport. It's like too many people have learned nothing from the USAG scandalIf anyone who is “too immature” to go against a massive federation with incredible political power is “too immature” to skate internationally, that’s going to leave out quite a lot of adults. Pressure of losing your livelihood doesn’t only or mostly affect children.
There are lots of reasons to do with this story that make it clear that 15 year olds should not compete with adults if they can’t be held to the same doping standards. This ain’t it.
If anyone who is “too immature” to go against a massive federation with incredible political power is “too immature” to skate internationally, that’s going to leave out quite a lot of adults. Pressure of losing your livelihood doesn’t only or mostly affect children.
There are lots of reasons to do with this story that make it clear that 15 year olds should not compete with adults if they can’t be held to the same doping standards. This ain’t it.
Really? Did any of the gymnastics adults push drugs on the athletes? How old is "old enough" to be expected to refuse to participate in doping?It seems that a lot of figure skating fans aren't ready to have a conversation about the power imbalances and abuse that goes on in this sport. It's like too many people have learned nothing from the USAG scandal
Trusova's dad was also an athlete and apparently he is strictly against any performance-enhancing drugs.Really? Did any of the gymnastics adults push drugs on the athletes? How old is "old enough" to be expected to refuse to participate in doping?
Most athletes who dope with performance-enhancing substances do it because they want unfair advantage. Is Valieva any different? Should it get her different treatment?
I guess the question is what does she actually know? The stories we have heard pretty consistently is that the team doctor gives them a little box (cup?) of pills before each competition that the girls call vitamins. We are guessing that these cups of pills are given out regularly -- such as every morning when they come to the rink or maybe they get a week's worth that they keep with them and take at regular intervals. But do they know what they are?Trusova's dad was also an athlete and apparently he is strictly against any performance-enhancing drugs.
Maybe now that she left Tutberidze AGAIN, she might spill the beans on whatever is going on there at some point...I mean what does she have to lose at this point?
Again it depends on what she knows. If she thinks she's getting vitamins and other supplements, then why wouldn't she take them?Most athletes who dope with performance-enhancing substances do it because they want unfair advantage. Is Valieva any different? Should it get her different treatment?
Her safety? I don't expect anyone to speak out against Tutka or anyone involved with state sponsored doping unless they're willing to go into witness protection in another country with their whole family.I mean what does she have to lose at this point?
People need to take off the North American tinted glasses.Her safety? I don't expect anyone to speak out against Tutka or anyone involved with state sponsored doping unless they're willing to go into witness protection in another country with their whole family.
There is no evidence that Sambo-70 was involved in state-sponsored doping. If they were, Valieva would not have had a positive test last Dec.Her safety? I don't expect anyone to speak out against Tutka or anyone involved with state sponsored doping unless they're willing to go into witness protection in another country with their whole family.
Definitely! Any of these girls has LOTS to lose by speaking out. I'm not talking about being thrown out a convenient window or poisoned (though at least one doping whistleblower from Russia died under questionable circumstances). Whether or not this was just camp Eteri or state sponsored, the Russian government hasn't killed athletes directly. I'm talking monetarily.People need to take off the North American tinted glasses.
I think you're lying to yourself if you think this isn't state sponsored. The medicines used here are very similar in mechanism of action to others used in previous Russian cases - and are medicines that aren't allowed outside of soviet markets (and even then some are known to be not that effective and therefore not used much outside of doping). The doctor associated with the Eteri camp has also been tied to prior cases of likely state sponsored doping.There is no evidence that Sambo-70 was involved in state-sponsored doping. If they were, Valieva would not have had a positive test last Dec.
The situation looks more to me like a Nike Oregon Project where the TPTB are looking for any edge and are willing to bend and even sometimes break the rules.
None of this is evidence of state-sponsored doping. When Russia was doing that, they faked results and interfered with sample taking. Lots of Russians having doping issues doesn't mean it's state-sponsored. Lots of US athletes in other sports are getting caught doping all the time. But our doping isn't state-sponsored.I think you're lying to yourself if you think this isn't state sponsored. The medicines used here are very similar in mechanism of action to others used in previous Russian cases - and are medicines that aren't allowed outside of soviet markets (and even then some are known to be not that effective and therefore not used much outside of doping). The doctor associated with the Eteri camp has also been tied to prior cases of likely state sponsored doping.
Oh, and there's plenty of evidence and anecdote that it was more than just the Eteri camp doping in Russian figure skating during this time period - Liza T. (Mishin) with meldonium, Maria Sotskova with document issues (Buianova), and Eketerina Bobrova with Meldonium (Zhulin).
You have every right to your opinion, but your opinion isn't evidence.Here, drink this (take this pill, have this injection) should have raised questions by Valieva. I'm not buying the notion that she was an unwitting victim.
RUSADA's timidous handling of the Valieva case is evidence that Tutberidze's group is indeed part of state-sponsored doping -- not the strongest possible evidence perhaps, but evidence nevertheless.There is no evidence that Sambo-70 was involved in state-sponsored doping. If they were, Valieva would not have had a positive test last Dec.
The situation looks more to me like a Nike Oregon Project where the TPTB are looking for any edge and are willing to bend and even sometimes break the rules.
This is the exact same propaganda excuse Russia trots out.None of this is evidence of state-sponsored doping. When Russia was doing that, they faked results and interfered with sample taking. Lots of Russians having doping issues doesn't mean it's state-sponsored. Lots of US athletes in other sports are getting caught doping all the time. But our doping isn't state-sponsored.
There are many groups involved in doping. Individuals, individual training centers, entire sports federations (i.e., Cycling in the Lance Armstrong era), and governments (Russia pre-Soshi). Doping can be widespread without the government getting involved.
Since this was one of the biggest allegations, I doubt WADA is stupid enough to let them find a way to try this - at least for big events. I know they have monitors on site for some Russian doping test centers to stop this very thing from happening, so it would make sense they had one on hand at this event as an Olympic qualifier.They can still swap out samples. It's one of the established techniques to hide doping and one that Russia engaged in.