I'm watching to see how RUSADA present their conclusions. Will it be an honest appraisal of what happened with an appropriate, transparent ruling? If so, that's a huge step forward and I'd be right in line to congratulate them! However...yeah. Who gets tossed under the bus on this will speak volumes about how they intend to move forward.
Russia has state-sponsored doping where authorities are actively involved in suppressing positive tests. Other countries, including Canada and the US, have non-sponsored doping, where the government is not involved but various training centres, coaching teams, and sporting authorities are often part of the team assisting athletes in accessing and using PEDs.
College/University level athletes are given scary lists of all the banned substances they can be tested for. I had a small book showing everything I needed to avoid, including cold medications. There was still doping at the university level in my sport and liberal use of TUEs. People are sneaky and the drive to win is unusually high among elite athletes aspiring to professional careers or Olympic glory along with the potential money, scholarships, or fame attached.
Russia needs to be taken to task for its doping, but let's not pretend everyone else is squeaky clean. We're not. Our problems are at grassroots and elite training levels rather than national government ones but our problems are just as real. Sport in general has a doping problem, one that's not easy to fix. For example, the Canadian government isn't running performance enhancement research but there's certainly national pride wrapped up in our athletes winning medals and championships. It's very easy for everyone to look the other way, never questioning suspicious results while pointing fingers at others. Just look at how many fans cry about how favourite athletes are "harassed" by the "bloodsuckers" who demand out-of-competition tests. It's the same everywhere.