Her jumps were toe loop, salchow, flip. I don't know which " 5 triples and 3 flip" you are talking about. Most certainly not the 3axel. Her contemporaries had harder jumps. Ito of course had all six, and the 3t3t. Yamaguchi had the 3Lz in 1989 (May be earlier?) IIRC Karen Kadavy had the 3R. Debbie Thomas had the 3R and I think 3f (not sure about that). Witt had the 3f but she didn't always use it. I saw Jill doubling the triples rather often. By 1991 many ladies were doing the 3Lz, some in combination. I think Debie Thomas doing 5 triples in her LP.
She was strong in school figures. That helped her win medals and the 1990 worlds (a real sore point with me). Of course it was not her fault. It was the system she competed under. She was a mediocre technical skater. She had a good carriage and personality on the ice. I liked her as a pro. Unfortunately that career was relatively short.
I think you know I meant she was doing a 5 triple free programme that included the triple flip, NOT that she had 5 different triples. Her contemporaries hardly had the same jumps, let alone harder jumps. She had the 3rd highest content at Worlds in 89 and 90, only bested by Ito (a total freak of nature, that hadn't been matched till Harding and the Russian girls of today). Yamaguchi was junior with tiny jumps and had 2 seasons littered with errors and falls. Witt almost never showed the flip, certainly not in the short. Leistner and Bonaly not even worth mentioning.
Either way the pertinent years for this thread were 1989 and 1990 when she was contention for gold, not the years when she was finishing 4th and 5th. There was no one that came even close to having the full package that was needed in those 2 years. You needed compulsories, jumps and artistry. Ito and Yamaguchi had neither compulsories, nor artistry (Yamaguchi went on to develop that).
Ternary was fast, powerful, polished had stunning basic skating with excellent posture and extension. The jumps she had were high and beautiful, not like today's almost spun, pre rotated tiny jumps. Saying she was a 'mediocre technical skater' is very erroneous, especially with her basics.
The only way one can argue her world title, as I mentioned in my thread, was her place in the short in Halifax, where she should have been lower than 5th. However many say that Ito should have also been lower than 10th in the compulsories and that despite her massive error on the first compulsory, they still tried to hold her up. She had ordinals as low as 21st in the compulsory!
Even if you look back at this 90' short programme, that almost lost her the title, only including a double toe-double toe combo, the rest of the elements are superb. Just the first 20 seconds emphasise everything I said earlier. The grace, the extension, the flow she gets from barely one push. The extension and flow through the spiral sequence (compare to Ito or Yamaguchi), the phrasing of the music on the layback. The double flip with the arms around the waist and the speed and ice coverage of the circular step.
Even in a disastrous programme, she was still stunning and by far the most complete skater. I mean she even got a 5.8 from Vanessa Riley, anyone that can do that with a mistake of that size, is definitely the complete package. No surprise that Bauil calls her, her favourite skater and inspiration. If you care enough, you should go back and look at the free too, with the hindsight of time.
short