Vaytsekhovskaya's interview with Irina Slutskaya

First, Honda’s short program was Don Quixote. You’re mixing his SP with his FS, because the 4T attempt in the long resulted in a big stepout. His free skate was Concierto de Aranjuez, and I really thought that program was a masterpiece at the time but his skating doesn’t hold up so well watching from IJS eyes.

That said, on the night I thought Goebel presented a well-rounded program and he really upped the attempt at listening to the music that season. Honda had weak-ish spins and the technical flaws/content he actually did produce wasn’t enough, even for me at that time as a big fan, to think he was robbed.

The skaters from 4th to 8th really could’ve been marked in any order IMO. It was a great night of skating even beyond the medals.
Correct, it was not DQ but Aranjuez, but i was talking about Honda's FS. Goebel probably did make an attempt to listen to music, for me it was not as good of "artistically" as Honda's. But you're right, the placements for all others (than P and Y) could have been anyplace.
 
Goebel (although a sweet-heart of a person) was always "wooden" with telegraphed jumps, long preparations while holding "stiff arms down towards the ground" and tight neck and shoulders.

Really, going there about another skater in this thread :rofl: ... Let Irina have her time. She had respectable set of jumps that withstood the Medvedeva era, not unlike Goebel had a respectable set of jumps that withstood the Hanyu era.
 
Did anyone rewatch Irinas skate? If anything the fix was for her win. She was messy and made mistakes. No way should she have been so close to winning. She’s delusional

I somewhat agree. The judges know that (usually) the SP is a formality, especially if 'your' skater is in the top 3. Had Sarah Hughes not skated lights out, it seemed the judges were ready to hand Irina the gold, and disguised their plan by having Kwan first in the SP so it wouldn't look so obvious. I found Slutskaya to be ungainly and unpleasant to watch, as well as Hughes. Kwan skated too tentatively and weak to justify giving gold to her.
 
Really, going there about another skater in this thread :rofl: ... Let Irina have her time. She had respectable set of jumps that withstood the Medvedeva era, not unlike Goebel had a respectable set of jumps that withstood the Hanyu era.
well... we covered about every top 5 in each venue at the 2002 Olys..
 
Tinami Amori said:
Goebel (although a sweet-heart of a person) was always "wooden" with telegraphed jumps, long preparations while holding "stiff arms down towards the ground" and tight neck and shoulders."

Goober's (autocorrect won't let me spell it!) skating to me was execrable. His jumps were small, his spins horrendous, posture and presentation atrocious. It's nice to read he's a sweetheart. He seemed inappropriately arrogant to me.
 
Goober's (autocorrect won't let me spell it!) skating to me was execrable. His jumps were small, his spins horrendous, posture and presentation atrocious. It's nice read he's a sweetheart. He seemed inappropriately arrogant to me.

Goebel was a whiner with numerous flaws, but he did his jumps, which was rare among American men until Nathan. I would take one Tim over five Todds.
 
Last edited:
I thought Goebel did a very nice job with the Gershwin. The only other program of his that I liked as much was his 2005-6 FS, Night on a Bald Mountain, which IIRC was either by Tarasova or had input from her. He wasn't able to do it justice, but he was trying for something to stretch himself.
 
Goebel skating to me was execrable. His jumps were small, his spins horrendous, posture and presentation atrocious. It's nice to read he's a sweetheart. He seemed inappropriately arrogant to me.
I liked Goebel's conduct and answers on Leno's show (but videos are not saved, or i could not find any). He is a very accomplished young man, not just skating, but education and his career. Someone i know works/worked with him at Google office, and thought he was great.... and so is his hubby... Timmy and Tommy... :summer:
https://alchetron.com/cdn/timothy-goebel-0f1741e1-7fbe-4452-b786-d3d71d894fc-resize-750.jpeg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/...g5_rb03Zi0BYNDmgcfYZ-C8VAfUsvtccvgCQlwsTEMzLh

(but in the days when he was skating, social media was not all over the place, so maybe others have other opinions of him).
 
I liked Goebel's conduct and answers on Leno's show (but videos are not saved, or i could not find any). He is a very accomplished young man, not just skating, but education and his career. Someone i know works/worked with him at Google office, and thought he was great.... and so is his hubby... Timmy and Tommy... :summer:
https://alchetron.com/cdn/timothy-goebel-0f1741e1-7fbe-4452-b786-d3d71d894fc-resize-750.jpeg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/...g5_rb03Zi0BYNDmgcfYZ-C8VAfUsvtccvgCQlwsTEMzLh

(but in the days when he was skating, social media was not all over the place, so maybe others have other opinions of him).

Tim getting a Bachelors in Math and Masters in Business Analytics after a career in figure skating where he won World and Olympic medals with respectable technical content speaks volumes about his quality. He is legitimately high caliber in any profession he has chosen so far.

... Maybe he just whined because he was actually doing hard stuff at the edge of his limits, as opposed to not working very hard but having limitless ability.
 
A big whine he was accused of was when he was having huge difficulties when his blades were mounted out of alignment. That was, allegedly, something that was a non-issue, unless you were a delicate snowflake.

It's something that is a no-brainer for anyone who knows the slightest thing about Feldenkrais, because it could easily impact a recreational skater who never got off a flat, let along someone who was landing quads on a correct edge. It's physics, which, with engineering, was what Feldenkrais was trained in and was the basis of his methodology.
 
A big whine he was accused of was when he was having huge difficulties when his blades were mounted out of alignment. That was, allegedly, something that was a non-issue, unless you were a delicate snowflake.

It's something that is a no-brainer for anyone who knows the slightest thing about Feldenkrais, because it could easily impact a recreational skater who never got off a flat, let along someone who was landing quads on a correct edge. It's physics, which, with engineering, was what Feldenkrais was trained in and was the basis of his methodology.
Did not he withdrew from one of the events, then was examined by the team's doctor, who found some escalated bone/foot problems since the previous examination? i remember "some stuff" about his several boot issues, but his comments (back then) sounded reasonable, pointing to his own situation, not accusing anyone.. and i believe Mike Weiss confirmed he had similar problems...
 
He was excoriated when he said he had boot issues, which turned out to be due to misaligned blades. He was clearly struggling, but was told to suck it up and to stop blaming it on his equipment and making excuses. That this was verified by a doctor only stopped some of the vitriol.
 
Plushenko had a bad LP. The judges didn't like it ( as me). They has changed it to Carmen. This is the reason why Plush wasn't at ECH. They created the Carmen program and worked on it during 2 months. If you remember.

It wasn't the program's problem - the judges never cared about his programs whern they showered him with 5.9s and 6.0s - if he had just done the second 3axel he would have won easily. Even without it he barely lost 4-3.
 
But, from the beginning both Irina and Maria had their reasons to think that the "fix is in" for ANY american girl to win (for a number of reasons listed before).

As it would be for a Russian girl in Sochi (which in the opinion of many is a particularly egregious example of home-cooked judging). And Irina would be aware of that.

So, Irina unfortunately did not have the advantage of competing at an Olympics in her home country. When one skater has a home-cooked advantage, others may be unfairly disadvantaged. But that's just how it goes.

It was not about winning FS over Hughes, it was about a "set up that started in SP to make sure any US girl wins", and that set up started with her low scores in SP, in her opinion..
- "back then" Slutskaya said that she would not have a problem if Kwan or even Cohen was above her/won Gold, because they are high quality skaters, with proven track record. But the fact that these two were behind her, and a "no-name" Hughes was above her, is a proof that "any US girl was planned for a win"....

And she may be right. But I think it's a bit rich for her to be complaining about that in light of what happened in Sochi. Perhaps a non-Russian interviewer might have challenged her.
 
Agree on the interview especially. I don't find Russians to be as mean-spirited as others seem to feel. I think they just tell it like it is because their audience at home is likely less sensitive to what we find in the west. Their interviews are consequently not a series of cliches and crafted narratives.

S/P would have held at silver if this was world's. But as I recall reading, the skating scandal/admission of cheating embarassed the Olympic movement on this very public stage. If memory serves, the IOC then and there challenged the ISU to fix this problem or risk having future participation in the Olympics be formally questioned (which in truth would likely never happen as one of the biggest audience drivers, but I digress). The dual golds and IJS were the result.

My takeaway here is that those who would have kept S/P at silver represent a material portion of the overall figure skating universe that has accepted that cheating, collusion and subjective marking are all generally accepted with the sport -- values that are not shared by the broader sporting community.

This DNA in skating is a part of what limits the audience for an otherwise appealing sport; generalized sports fans cannot respect a sport for which results are only partially driven by what happens on the playing field and more by backroom deals and/or the lattitude among a judging panel to just pick who you want. From an outsiders' perspective, eligible skating is pure entertainment fluff with a number of miles to go to earn the credibility of a real sport, in their eyes.

If that problem could ever be fixed, the opportunities for skating would be almost limitless.
The biggest limitation on Figure Skating/Speed Skating/Hockey/Curling being truly participated in on a global scale is the lack of access to rinks and the exorbitant cost. Plus the reason in the quote, why would countries want to invest in rinks that are expensive to maintain if the competitions are allegedly fixed and judged subjectively and there are no local experts to assist? There's a reason why there are only 29 skating federations globally, yet FS/speed skating (with global hockey fans growing tremendously) merit their own seperate TV negotiation contracts because of viewership. In comparison, Gymnastics has 148 with 1 Federation on suspension. Reason for this anomaly, a child can at least start learning cartwheels and handstands on dirt to show appropriate interest to the head of household to maybe enter the child in a $50 8 week tumble class. That child could also 'practice' in their front yard, per say. A child can't learn to skate without ice. A child can't learn to skate without skates. They also can't truly practice without ice, nor compete without sharp tight blades or ungodly extensively created costumes.
Poor ol' Irina can't even maintain first place ordinals in her own thread. Displaced by pair skaters - where women who can't jump go.

(I personally don't believe pairs women have lesser skill sets than singles but apparently lots of others do. )
It's quotes like these that make me wish I could love/laugh/like emoji 100x
This. And those who don't like it would say the North American pairs skaters have no style.

But wouldn't it get rather boring if all pairs skaters had the classical Russian style?

I appreciate the classical Russian style and the view that 'if it works, don't fix it', but some Russian pairs have just been cookie-cutter and not brought anything uniquely distinctive to their programs. IMO. Though of course, some western pairs have been lacking in terms of a distinct style, also.
Totally agree, except Russian figure skaters single and pairs/dance have for decades had two schools of different styles with in Russia itself. Moscow is typically, as you said, very traditional and classical like that current Russian pair I refuse to name and their atrocities in music selection (Candy Man for an OG FS?...Really!? Barf) and Pogo and Yags as example. St Petersburg school has a much more out of the box avant garde style like that handsome Kolyada and Plush. It's always fun to see them asian carp fight over style every year.
LOL. Wasn't Sarah the reigning World bronze medalist going into Salt Lake? And also as @Coco said, she had rather famously beaten both Slutskaya and Kwan at Skate Canada earlier that season. I'm sure she had beaten Butyrskaya at various points too. She was not exactly some "no-name" going into Salt Lake. :lol:
I also want to quickly say this....of the three US ladies, Hughes would have been the last Gold Medal pick the US would lobby for. She would have been, and eventually did, become the only ever US American skater of any discipline Gold Medalist not to ever be a World or National champion. As a matter of fact she finished a distant 3rd at Nationals. She was basically like the anti marketable christ. Not super pretty, kind of goofy and awkward, not super eloquent, or trendy, not much of a feel good back story, father went to Cornell upper middle class so other than having a less successful younger sister Emily who eventually went to the 06 OG not much to draw from. She just happens to have a Gold medal fall in her lap by default. Unlike Lipinski, she was too young and tomboyish to invest in, especially back then when 60% of everything was packaging. Lipinski had at least a firecracker personality and uber talented girly girl who people immediately liked, Sasha had style and personal drama, and Kwan was truly a full packaged ice princess and skating and style icon.

Yeah, because Todd's mythical 4T was going to magically appear and make it obvious he should win over guys with 2 or 3 quads :rofl:
Ummmm...what current US mens skater does that currently remind us of? A mythical single 4T now a mythical single 4S are going to magically appear clean and think PCS will make up for the guys doing 4L+3T combos in the short and long? Oh yeah Jason Brown

He was excoriated when he said he had boot issues, which turned out to be due to misaligned blades. He was clearly struggling, but was told to suck it up and to stop blaming it on his equipment and making excuses. That this was verified by a doctor only stopped some of the vitriol.
And these 2 years of 'whiny' boot issues and 'get over it' to a 18/19 year old kid destroyed his hips and knee, effectively ruining his career at 21. I remember this going down and it was so cruel and unethical it upsets me to type about it now. Most of the time practicing with no hip guards to prove he could fall 'right'. He"d then wait to take ice baths and compressions at a separate PT or at home to avoid The Costa. It's a sad story not told enough.
 
I just want to add to the wuzrobbing of Suguri and Gusmeroli at SLC! :mitchell:

Those flamin SP ordinals :wuzrobbed ...I'd need to rewatch properly but I don't think I'd have even had Hughes in the final group for the LP.
 
Last edited:
^Suguri definitely wuz robbed by the Skate Gods. What a stroke of double bad luck to be pushed from 6th ->7th due to switching ordinals by another skater at the end of the competition, and then draw 1st in the penultimate group for the LP.

I'm not so sure about Gusmeroli. She seemed so listless at SLC. This was not 2000 Gusmeroli skating.
 
I don't know if Vanessa was robbed or just unlucky. It was an extremely well skated short program with very few skaters making major errors. So it really came down to little things like the fullness and variety of your steps, traveling on spins, variety of jumps and spin positions you selected, etc.

https://youtu.be/Vu7cYhQa774
 
Last edited:
.
And she may be right. But I think it's a bit rich for her to be complaining about that in light of what happened in Sochi. Perhaps a non-Russian interviewer might have challenged her.

Maybe she thinks that was a revans for her and Vancouver in men. In Russia both of them received people's medal after their defeat. Those were real gold medals the organizers collected gold from people.
 
Last edited:
From memory didn't at least the top 9/10 ladies all go clean in the SP? It must have been pretty tough to mark.

I also recall thinking that that Sarah Meier was the only one that had decently steps into her solo triple.
 
Maybe she thinks that was a revans for her and Vancouver in men. Both of them received people's medal after their defeat.
And she may be right. But I think it's a bit rich for her to be complaining about that in light of what happened in Sochi. Perhaps a non-Russian interviewer might have challenged her.

If one has 20 mins to kill this video is super interesting and specifically breaks down both Yuna and Lena's free programs in Sochi element by element including video reviews. The creator also included the ISU issued training video jump examples of the elements that are supposed to act as 'Jump 0' and mandatory viewing for all levels of judging and given at the beginning of the cycle.

https://youtu.be/_1N3gol_eN8

Here's the thing about the mens 2010 OG, whether or not we agree or not, the decision was at least based on subjective judging and nothing obviously definitive. The judged subjectively decided Evan's artistic impression and program components to be greater than Plush's and his technical content. It is what it is....figure skating

The thing about the women's 2014 event was it was a blatant Russian fix that they didn't even give the respect to try to hide. Unlike the Men's 2010 event, there was nothing subjective about having 1 judge out of 9 who was already previously suspended for trying to fix an event at the 1998 games in RU's favor. That's a fact. And another judge being the wife of the former president and current general director of the Russian figure skating federation. That's a fact. You can not expect anyone to believe that they couldn't find 2 less controversial judges to work one of the biggest events of the decade. They could have picked two Russian judges for all I care, just not ones who are related to the RU def's top sports brass. Come on now! It's insane. And I don't even think it's was a big deal that the Sports Minister Wife/judge gave Lena a hug after the event.

But I do care that there was/is actual video proof of borderline edge calls and UR being called on Y and K that were mostly not called on them during the season, and the same calls that had been an issue perviously (lutz and back end triple toe combo) not even reviewed by the judging panel for Lena. None-the-less actually scoring her technical components even close to accurate. It was obvious Yuna and Carolina were far far superior to Lena but they still lost by over 6 points? Didn't even bother to at least make it close? It's was a slap in the face. I mean, Lena's PCS increased by 18 points since the GPF? She wasn't even gifted those mark's by her own federation at their Nationals a month before. I think this atrocity is worse then the SLC Pairs cheating.
 
Here's the thing about the mens 2010 OG, whether or not we agree or not, the decision was at least based on subjective judging and nothing obviously definitive. The judged subjectively decided Evan's artistic impression and program components to be greater than Plush's and his technical content. It is what it is....figure skating

.

hmmm....Plushenko received higher second marks as Evan. ;) Evan won with tech marks :lol:

But silence! This thread is not about Vancouver!
 
If one has 20 mins to kill this video is super interesting and specifically breaks down both Yuna and Lena's free programs in Sochi element by element including video reviews. The creator also included the ISU issued training video jump examples of the elements that are supposed to act as 'Jump 0' and mandatory viewing for all levels of judging and given at the beginning of the cycle.

https://youtu.be/_1N3gol_eN8

Koola King is an internet troll who makes loads of completely false claims in her videos, it is not worth anyone wasting their time on an youtube troll at all.
 
I somewhat agree. The judges know that (usually) the SP is a formality, especially if 'your' skater is in the top 3. Had Sarah Hughes not skated lights out, it seemed the judges were ready to hand Irina the gold, and disguised their plan by having Kwan first in the SP so it wouldn't look so obvious. I found Slutskaya to be ungainly and unpleasant to watch, as well as Hughes. Kwan skated too tentatively and weak to justify giving gold to her.

Michelle would have won if she hadn't fallen. Her skating wasn't tentative (that was the --unfair, IMO--knock on her at Nagano). As Scott Hamilton said after her long program, it wasn't perfect but it was courageous.
 
hmmm....Plushenko received higher second marks as Evan. ;) Evan won with tech marks :lol:

But silence! This thread is not about Vancouver!
First and foremost, this thread has already ventured into the unknown and I'm on the current topic. Thanks

2nd you are, of course, wrong about Plush and Evan and I am, of course right. But I can break it down for you:
SP:
Plush TES 51.10 PCS 39.75
Evan TES 48.30 PCS 42.00

LP:
Plush: TES 82.81 PCS 82.80
Evan: TES 84.57 PCS 82.80

Plush: TES Total 51.10 + 82.80= 133.90
Evan: TES Total 48.30 + 84.57= 132.87
133.90>132.87 :D

Plush: PCS Total 39.75 + 82.80= 122.55
Evan: PCS Total 42.00 + 82.80= 124.80
122.55<124.80 :lol:

Like I said, Evan won because the judges thought his PCS were subjectively better than Plush's tech content. Period.

Seems like the whole world fails to fact check. Sorry but no one pressed your buzzer to comment and comment uneducated of the facts. So Silence! :kickass:
 
Last edited:
Koola King is an internet troll who makes loads of completely false claims in her videos, it is not worth anyone wasting their time on an youtube troll at all.
I respectfully disagree. One is not a troll just because you don't agree with their opinion. You have to give some respect to someone who took the time to make, edit, research, piece together, and narrate a 20 min video. It's a well made and informative video. I'm assuming you didn't watch the whole video but it's hard to dispute what is literally being shown and compared and compared again right in front of your eyes.
 
I respectfully disagree. One is not a troll just because you don't agree with their opinion. You have to give some respect to someone who took the time to make, edit, research, piece together, and narrate a 20 min video. It's a well made and informative video. I'm assuming you didn't watch the whole video but it's hard to dispute what is literally being shown and compared and compared again right in front of your eyes.

I give no respect to an internet troll who makes frame by frame analysis of, for example, Medvedeva's flutz and uses footage of Medvedeva's flip (three turn entrance and all) claiming it is Medvedeva's lutz to pick apart the inside edge take off. Even more ridiculous is the fact she could have used actual Lutz footage, but since it was a questionable edge and makes a stronger argument to give it an ! rather than an e, she would rather use footage of the flip instead, that is completely fake analysis.

I've also wasted my time before looking at her videos before I knew she was a troll, so it is more a warning to other posters to not waste their time on it. So no I didn't even waste 1 second watching the link you posted except to see who posted it and know it's not worth my time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information