Anywhere from 25th to 27th out of 39. Fifth group out of seven; Torgashev will be earlier in the same group.What is Brown’s skating order? A cleanish program plus a late skating order will help immensely
Anywhere from 25th to 27th out of 39. Fifth group out of seven; Torgashev will be earlier in the same group.What is Brown’s skating order? A cleanish program plus a late skating order will help immensely
This is a tragedy of the scoring system. Sorry, but novice level content should not be scoring 85+ in the senior men's SP, regardless of how great someone's spins and footwork are.I posted upthread the same thing- Brown will make the free, and probably quite comfortably, even with a 3+2 and a 2A. If he gets the 3+3 and has troubles on or doubles the Axel, he's still looking at potentially ~85 points even with a "conservative" PCS scoring. 85.00 was good enough for 10th place last year, as a comparison.
Brown has a pretty egregious flutz, so his "lutz" should never be scoring big on GOE. That doesn't mean that it won't, but it shouldn't.The jumps he does land typically score big on GOE.
That's not a tragedy of the system, though. I don't get it. The system is (ideally) built to rewards strengths across all facets of skating, and the jumps do not mean everything. If this were in reverse and the Russians were all back making 95% of FSU's blood boil for their scoring, we would hear all about the big jumps being the one thing that somehow reward and boost everything else in one's skating and how that's not fair.This is a tragedy of the scoring system. Sorry, but novice level content should not be scoring 85+ in the senior men's SP, regardless of how great someone's spins and footwork are.
I think we all know I'm the head cheerleader of calling jumps as they are performed. At worst he's probably getting a !, though. Well actually I'll see what the panels are and then decideBrown has a pretty egregious flutz, so his "lutz" should never be scoring big on GOE. That doesn't mean that it won't, but it shouldn't.
I think your point might have more weight if you didn't exaggerate. It's more like Junior level content but even some of the first group skaters in Senior ISU comps have similar content. So I would say Senior OES content.Sorry, but novice level content should not be scoring 85+ in the senior men's SP, regardless of how great someone's spins and footwork are.
Agreed. The tragedy is not the system but the judging where GOEs and PCS are too high for what is put on the ice. IMO, anyway.The system is (ideally) built to rewards strengths across all facets of skating, and the jumps do not mean everything
Agree.This is a tragedy of the scoring system. Sorry, but novice level content should not be scoring 85+ in the senior men's SP, regardless of how great someone's spins and footwork are.
IMHO, the "tragedy" here is that (1) PCS counts for less than half of most skaters' TSS and (2) the difference in between what Brown and someone like Malinin normally receive in PCS is insufficient to compensate properly for this discrepancy.This is a tragedy of the scoring system. Sorry, but novice level content should not be scoring 85+ in the senior men's SP, regardless of how great someone's spins and footwork are.
My comment was in response to the hypothetical that Brown lands only a 2A, triple/double combo and solo triple. And yes, that's novice level content.I think your point might have more weight if you didn't exaggerate.
I believe that the point was that Brown earns GOE and levels far beyond what lower-level Senior competitors do, even those good enough to go to Worlds. And why shouldn't he?My comment was in response to the hypothetical that Brown lands only a 2A, triple/double combo and solo triple. And yes, that's novice level content.
I understood your comment. I have seen that content in the first group(s) of Men at 4CC and IIRC Euros.My comment was in response to the hypothetical that Brown lands only a 2A, triple/double combo and solo triple. And yes, that's novice level content.
From U.S. men?I understood your comment. I have seen that content in the first group(s) of Men at 4CC and IIRC Euros.
I already said it was Senior OES content. Since we're talking about scoring at ISU championships and how Jason compared, what US Novice Men do is irrelevant.From U.S. men?
Oh yes, a triple flip that he turned out of under the spotlights on a show rink - in a highly emotional show - is the absolute be-all and end-all of assessment on how ready Jason is.Interesting that he reached USFS’s desired standard in his private monitoring. In his public appearances, his easier triples still look questionable. I mean at Legacy on Ice, Sofia Bezkorovainaya looked more prepared technically to compete in the senior men’s event than Brown did!
Well, comparatively speaking, a turned out 3F was the easiest content attempted by any of the senior men OR women performing, but hey, keep coping.Oh yes, a triple flip that he turned out of under the spotlights on a show rink - in a highly emotional show - is the absolute be-all and end-all of assessment on how ready Jason is.![]()
Absolutely, it’s not, which is why my next paragraph that you omitted remarked on my wish for a public assessment. Transparency is a good thing.Oh yes, a triple flip that he turned out of under the spotlights on a show rink - in a highly emotional show - is the absolute be-all and end-all of assessment on how ready Jason is.![]()
It obviously wasn't going to be a tribute show where the USFS was going to make the decision.Well, comparatively speaking, a turned out 3F was the easiest content attempted by any of the senior men OR women performing, but hey, keep coping.
ETA - but, I will state that I do not believe the show skate was where Jason's skating was assessed. All the Team USA skaters were out in Virginia practicing the day before and it's my assumption that is where his monitoring happened.
it's very simple- if the skaters are my favorites they should max out their pcs regardless of their jumping ability and also ignore their jumps you won't find that in your "manual" and "rules" but it's still trueIt obviously wasn't going to be a tribute show where the USFS was going to make the decision.
ETA- just a general thought to what I'm reading here and how the system is broken because PCS one minute is held in too high regard and the next minute it's not held in enough regard versus all the (typically) non-American jumping beans. Which one is it? And I mean Jason more than just about every other skater checks all the boxes off for getting massive GOE on his spins especially, and even on his step sequences.
So back to basics we go. A triple Axel is worth 4.7 points more in base value than a double Axel. A triple toe is worth 2.9 more points than I double toe. 7.6 points base value difference, plus of course potential GOE gained or lost on a bigger scale with the more difficult jumps. But what I want to know is what some people think the difference is or should be?
And I'll also throw in the reminder than Kevin Aymoz did a 3T+3T, 3A, and 3Lz with landing issues (-0.71 GOE) at the Road to '26 and scored 88 points. Those are two of the most well-rounded skaters in the field, and I for one am happy that the rest of their skating doesn't take a huge hit for some unwritten reason just because the content is 'novice' apparently.
A triple axel is not novice content; a double axel is.And I'll also throw in the reminder than Kevin Aymoz did a 3T+3T, 3A, and 3Lz with landing issues (-0.71 GOE) at the Road to '26 and scored 88 points. Those are two of the most well-rounded skaters in the field, and I for one am happy that the rest of their skating doesn't take a huge hit for some unwritten reason just because the content is 'novice'-- apparently.
They are definitely superior to Siao Him Fa's. Adam has a lot of strengths but he doesn't have the glide and flow that Kevin has.As for the marks, to my taste Aymoz is overrated. He's no more well-rounded in the evenness of his abilities (spins, jumps, footwork, skating skills) than any other dozen+ skaters - Torgy, Pulkinen, Rizzo, Memola, Vasjilievs, Romsky, Siao Him Fa, Kagiyama, Miura, Sato, Cha, etc. Like Jason, he's typically very emotionally engaged in his performances, but I don't think his skating skills are superior to any of the afore-mentioned skaters.
There is one thing that he has that others don’t. Abandon. He is less controlled in his movement but more abandon. It really showed in Question of U. Compared that with Jason’s program to the same music he has more abandon which adds to excitement when cleanA triple axel is not novice content; a double axel is.
As for the marks, to my taste Aymoz is overrated. He's no more well-rounded in the evenness of his abilities (spins, jumps, footwork, skating skills) than any other dozen+ skaters - Torgy, Pulkinen, Rizzo, Memola, Vasjilievs, Romsky, Siao Him Fa, Kagiyama, Miura, Sato, Cha, etc. Like Jason, he's typically very emotionally engaged in his performances, but I don't think his skating skills are superior to any of the afore-mentioned skaters.
There is one thing that he has that others don’t. Abandon. He is less controlled in his movement but more abandon. It really showed in Question of U. Compared that with Jason’s program to the same music he has more abandon which adds to excitement when clean
Aymoz tends to present far better range of movement than most you mentioned here, if not all. The choreography and transitions tend to be much richer. IMO, anyway. And no, that Bolero, as an example, was just not to my taste, nor did I like that 2021-22 long program, or either of this or the previous season's programs.As for the marks, to my taste Aymoz is overrated. He's no more well-rounded in the evenness of his abilities (spins, jumps, footwork, skating skills) than any other dozen+ skaters - Torgy, Pulkinen, Rizzo, Memola, Vasjilievs, Romsky, Siao Him Fa, Kagiyama, Miura, Sato, Cha, etc.
I agree actually. It makes more sense to construct a program around their best attributes, than getting everything 'up to scratch'. Barely anyone, if not nobody at all, was good at everything.I’m old enough to just appreciate skaters who lean into their best attributes and construct programs around them. Trying to “do it all” inevitably causes them to crash and burn on their weaker elements.
Yes, because all of us are qualified judges. And none of us, of course have any bias . I mean none of us either want him to do well or want him to do badly so our favorite can go. And since we’re unbiased we are the best judges ever.Interesting that he reached USFS’s desired standard in his private monitoring. In his public appearances, his easier triples still look questionable. I mean at Legacy on Ice, Sofia Bezkorovainaya looked more prepared technically to compete in the senior men’s event than Brown did!
IMO monitoring should be done in public, preferably in competition like Levito did.
I don't think Levito flew halfway across the world for her monitoring. She flew halfway across the world to be a part of NBC's 1-yr to Milano-Cortina countdown celebrations on The Today Show. And her mom is from Milano, so it was an opportunity to see family. That Road to 26 Trophy was that same week was a nice coincidence. I suspect that she would have competed in that event in lieu of 4CCs even had she been at Nats.Yes, because all of us are qualified judges. And none of us, of course have any bias . I mean none of us either want him to do well or want him to do badly so our favorite csnn go. And since we’re unbiased we are the best judges ever.
Honestly, there’s no reason for it to be done publicly except for that.
Personally, I’m not sure why Levito had to fly halfway across the world to do her monitoring, but if she did, she did. I hope that it was just something she wanted to do and not US figure skatings idea of a great plan. I can understand why other skaters would not want to do international travel leading up to worlds. As someone who does international travel for work, it is exhausting. “Let’s show up at worlds exhausted because that will be so much better” said no one ever.![]()