MacMadame
Doing all the things
- Messages
- 64,945
Did she? How can one draw a meaningful distinction, given her mother's instability?

Did she? How can one draw a meaningful distinction, given her mother's instability?
What does her mother's instability have to do it with what class they were?
My friends who were raised by a single parent must be lucky because most their households were as stable as my two parent household!
Absolutely no extra money for anything beyond basics, but dinner together every night, help with homework, clean clothes that fit, never changing school in the middle of the year, etc. I mean, that would be how I would define stable.
This continual modern effort to turn Tonya into a folk hero is getting ridiculous. While she didn't swing the baton, she still participated in a vicious and disgusting attack that injured another person. I'm getting tired of the way the attack on Nancy seems to have been turned into no big deal or even a joke (whiny, "why me" Nancy) as time goes on. Yes, Tonya had a lousy childhood and crummy taste in husbands, but she can only blame her own laziness and stubbornness for her inability to reach the highest peaks in skating. The biggest obstacle in Tonya's skating life wasn't Nancy, or her ex-husband, or USFS, or any outside factor. It was Tonya herself. And she committed a crime, and she's gotten way more than her 15 minutes surrounding the incident.
According to certain academic studies I've read, middle-class whites look down on "white trash" because their behavior resembles that of stereotypical lower-class black Americans.
I think the statements that "single parents' can't be stable on here are misleading. I know a lot of single parents who are doing a great job. I also know some upper class well off families whose kids are turning out as total disasters!
It's not the number of parents or even the "amount of cash" that can be the final determination as to how things turn out. It's the parenting!
(I also know some single parents whose income, from their jobs, is plenty to provide a more than "stable" lifestyle. LOL! At least one of my friends has MORE money to spend on her kids now that she dumped the deadbeat ex!)
While I expect that the Admins here will give you some leeway on this one, you should be aware of the possible consequences of using certain terms on social media (or elsewhere), especially when posting under your own name:
A Yale Dean Lost Her Job After Calling People ‘White Trash’ in Yelp Reviews
I do think that class issues were at play. I also think a nuanced exploration of them would be interesting. So far I haven't seen any because most of the analysis I've seen has bought right into the surface story and not delved any deeper.
We went to see "T." last night in Chicago. I'm a member of a group that assesses theater for award consideration and I'm not technically supposed to write an assessment (other than our internal ones) so I won't comment on the performances or the production values. I'm permitted to discuss the script (since it didn't premiere in Chicago) and I'll say I wasn't a fan. It has a very stilted language style that distances you from the characters and keeps you from caring about them. Nancy has no role here, other that references Jeff makes to her as "horse face" and descriptions of her as having the "princess" image that sometimes receives higher than deserving marks. The play really focuses on Jeff and the bodyguard and their inept plotting... "T." clearly is aware that something is up, and does nothing to stop it but also asks to be left out of it. (She is pretty disappointed when Nancy recovers so quickly, which is a telling moment.) And "T.'s" dad is portrayed as having lost touch with reality completely. Seems to hone pretty much to the facts as we know them.From the New York Times, no less!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/12/theater/tonya-harding-nancy-kerrigan-figure-skating.html
As a former English major, the author of a skating novel, and a fan who remembers the Tonya/Nancy era, I suppose I should say something profound and academic here. But I'll leave that to somebody else.
We went to see "T." last night in Chicago. I'm a member of a group that assesses theater for award consideration and I'm not technically supposed to write an assessment (other than our internal ones) so I won't comment on the performances or the production values. I'm permitted to discuss the script (since it didn't premiere in Chicago) and I'll say I wasn't a fan. It has a very stilted language style that distances you from the characters and keeps you from caring about them. Nancy has no role here, other that references Jeff makes to her as "horse face" and descriptions of her as having the "princess" image that sometimes receives higher than deserving marks. The play really focuses on Jeff and the bodyguard and their inept plotting... "T." clearly is aware that something is up, and does nothing to stop it but also asks to be left out of it. (She is pretty disappointed when Nancy recovers so quickly, which is a telling moment.) And "T.'s" dad is portrayed as having lost touch with reality completely. Seems to hone pretty much to the facts as we know them.