Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why? To try something new...to branch out...to take risks...to grow.Why? Why do they have to try to be sultry? Because you insist on it?
Why? To try something new...to branch out...to take risks...to grow.
She is very much in the Maddison Hubbell mode, what’s not to love. Now let’s hope she doesn’t make the Zach mistakes tomorrow.Natalie is a wonder. Every time I see her, I love her more. What's not to like, honestly? Her deep, strong edges are a given, but what impressed me in her performance today was the flexibility through her back, and the way she uses even her head movements to add emphasis--just such an engaging performance.
No they don’t have to try unless you are coaching at IAM now. A lot of us think it can work very well for them.They have to try. That would be trying something new for them, rather than doing something safe and expected (staying in their lane and comfort zone), that does not work.
This is like giving up at the start of the race.
yeah, there were multiple complaints about their speed in the graham program throughout the year last year. i really hoped it was for the reasons you stated here, but their speed doesn't seem to have improved in this year's rd. i like this rd more than most people here, apparently, but not more than some of the other rd's this year.Speed was definitely an issue last season. They might have got away with it in the Martha Graham program because they were making and holding unique shapes, but there’s no excuse for slowness in a Latin number.
I am honestly wondering if the people who hated it were only watching her. He was AWESOME.Jean-Luc Baker is a. That is all.
she doesn't get the credit she deserves, but i think a lot of it has to do with how incredible he is. she suffers by comparison in the same way papadakis did next cizeron. but both of these women are incredible skaters and performers in their own right, but what can you do when your partners are two of the best ice dancers by leaps and bounds in the last couple of olympic cycles?I am honestly wondering if the people who hated it were only watching her. He was AWESOME.
I think the way they are scored is the biggest problemI don't think choreo elements were the worst thing to happen to Ice dance....in the FD, I feel they help make each program unique. But I don't think they belong in the RD and agree there should be a pattern.
Yes, I mostly meant in terms of scoring (though having 3 elements that are not really about pure skating isn't helping matters either). The choreographic elements are scored in a way that is completely predetermined and comes from the general ranking of the team regardless of what they put on the ice (unless there's a major error). P/C for example had some of the blandest choreographic elements and were the only team who always got +5 for them which gave them about 2 points advantage over other teams in the top 5 who often had much more impressive choreographic elements. I can often call out the GOE that a team will get based on their ranking, with the occasional mid-to-up level team getting higher GOE than usual because they have impressive or fan-favorite choreographic elements (Smart/Diaz, Fear/Gibson).I think the way they are scored is the biggest problem
Absolutely! I didn't actually intend my comment to come off as nasty to Hawayek as it turned out sounding!she doesn't get the credit she deserves, but i think a lot of it has to do with how incredible he is. she suffers by comparison in the same way papadakis did next cizeron. but both of these women are incredible skaters and performers in their own right, but what can you do when your partners are two of the best ice dancers by leaps and bounds in the last couple of olympic cycles?
Oh, good point! I was just trying to remember if there was this much difference of opinion over RDs in previous years. I think you've hit on a reason for it.I love how everyone has completely different opinions about the RDs we've seen so far, and it makes sense since how one feels about music, interpretation, and even choreography is so subjective and personal, especially when comparing teams with similar skill levels. But it really also proves how essential it is to have the pattern be part of the RD so there will be something a bit more objective to compare between teams (I personally also think there are many other good reasons to keep the pattern).
I think adding the choreographic element to the free dance was crucial - all the programs looked too similar. It's the breath of fresh air for me. With all the other elements, it doesn't have as big an impact.Instead, now we have a choreographic element with no level that's worth 2 points of base value but has GOE that goes up to 7.5 points which is exactly how a team like Fear/Gibson (who I like) can get 85 in the RD while having mediocre skating skills. They took one of the worst things to happen to free dances (choreographic elements), added it to the RD, and somehow made it even worse.
I want to know too because half of the members of the Ice Dance Technical Committee changed after the Congress this summer (Gordon Poltorak, Elek and Margaglio replaced by Molina, Wolter and Weaver), so I wonder if the half remaining (Rettstatt, Selby and Ucar) was among the big cheerleaders of the removal.I really want to know who's bright idea it was to remove the pattern dance from the RD.
The removal was already known, prior to the ISU Congress, though, so I don't know that they could have changed it from happening for this season. What I find rather interesting is that next season's theme hasn't been announced yet. Usually we know the following season's RD theme before the start of the current season, so I'm curious what's going on within the ID Tech Committee.I want to know too because half of the members of the Ice Dance Technical Committee changed after the Congress this summer (Gordon Poltorak, Elek and Margaglio replaced by Molina, Wolter and Weaver), so I wonder if the half remaining (Rettstatt, Selby and Ucar) was among the big cheerleaders of the removal.
I bet it was Rettstatt and Selby - because IAM never taught patterns well and what countries are their biggest teams right now from? USA and GBR.I want to know too because half of the members of the Ice Dance Technical Committee changed after the Congress this summer (Gordon Poltorak, Elek and Margaglio replaced by Molina, Wolter and Weaver), so I wonder if the half remaining (Rettstatt, Selby and Ucar) was among the big cheerleaders of the removal.
Maybe this is is an experimental year? I want a waltz RD SO BAD at this point so I hope they have a waltz-y theme next year.The removal was already known, prior to the ISU Congress, though, so I don't know that they could have changed it from happening for this season. What I find rather interesting is that next season's theme hasn't been announced yet. Usually we know the following season's RD theme before the start of the current season, so I'm curious what's going on within the ID Tech Committee.
Yes, I probably didn't write clearly. I didn't mean the incoming IDTC could have reversed the decision but that if those who were behind it are still in the new IDTC, it can mean they may carry out in this way also in the near future.The removal was already known, prior to the ISU Congress, though, so I don't know that they could have changed it from happening for this season. What I find rather interesting is that next season's theme hasn't been announced yet. Usually we know the following season's RD theme before the start of the current season, so I'm curious what's going on within the ID Tech Committee.
Ahhh, yes. I'm hoping and praying that the ones who are still on the IDTC were NOT the ones behind this change and that we get back to something better than what we have this season. I really do not want an entire quad of this pattern-less RD crap.Yes, I probably didn't write clearly. I didn't mean the incoming IDTC could have reversed the decision but that if those who were behind it are still in the new IDTC, it can mean they may carry out in this way also in the near future.
I wouldn't put it on IAM, I remember Patrice Lauzon being super vocal against the suggestion to remove patterns in the past. My bet is that it's an attempt to make the RD feel more fresh and interesting and less limiting (it fails of course).I bet it was Rettstatt and Selby - because IAM never taught patterns well and what countries are their biggest teams right now from? USA and GBR.