Amy L
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,006
Please do not speculate about the identities of victims, witnesses, or third party reporters. This type of comment and public speculation is a reason why many people decline to participate in SafeSport investigations.
What difference does it make who Modlin was referencing? Does the identity of the person referenced make Modlin's comment more or less appropriate? What would you do with the information, give credence to her comment by speculating about the referenced person's internal motivations with no information about what those are because that person hasn't spoken publicly? Can you see how that ties back to these types of "analyses" being a reason why people within the very small skating community decline to participate in SafeSport investigations?
Disparaging the motivations of the victim or third party reporter is almost ubiquitous when allegations of assault or abuse are made. It's straight out of the abuser playbook. It's intended to cast doubt on the allegation, harm the reputation of the victim/third party reporter and silence others from coming forward because they see what will be done to them. Please don't give that tactic power.
![Confused :confused: :confused:](/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/confused1.gif)
You could have just said the first couple of paragraphs without accusing me of perpetuating the cycle of abuse. But if that made you feel better to go for it then I'm glad to be of service
![Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes1.gif)