Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sotnikova, 17 when she won at Sochi 2014, was named in an evidence disclosure package published with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-commissioned McLaren Report as one athlete about whom scratches indicative of tampering were found on test tubes in which urine samples were submitted.
insidethegames understands that former Moscow laboratory director Grigory Rodchenkov, the main witness in the McLaren Report, claimed she was not part of the programme.
Perhaps it was another way to suppress the Russian athlete because, remembering 2014 when they said after some time that they found doping in my probe and I was supposed to have a trial and everything, but then I was acquitted because the second sample was opened and everything was fine. But this is a different story. I felt terrible, I was in a depressed state. And imagine: a child who performed, already won gold, and she just needed to go out again and win gold one more time… well, of course, we had other girls who competed, and it was unpredictable who would win.” said Sotnikova on TatarkaFM
That is also what I wanted! And this "revelation" probably makes Gracie Gold sad too.Sigh. I'm still sad I didn't get my Mao-Yuna-Carolina podium in 2014. And this "revelation" doesn't make it better.
"Only Russians are caught". So, they're saying they're both very good at cheating?Maybe I am reading too much into the translation, but here's what is suspicious:
It reads to me that Sotnikova is using her story to push the narrative that Valieva was held down. As in, "doping is fine because every one does it", but "only Russians are caught". Reads to me like Sotnikova indeed might have done it at some point during the season, even before we get to the icarus stuff.
My recollection of the McLaren report: I think it was the B vials that had the scratching - because the B vials were supposed to be tamper proof sealed until later testing at request of the athlete so they devised a tool to open them and swap out the sample with the vial still looking sealed to the naked eye. The tool sometimes left the scratches. The A samples were opened and tested within a day or two so they had a stopper and not a tamper proof storage cap.Do we know which of her samples had the scratching on it, or was it both? And was that the only issue or was it actually positive?
That makes sense. If her A sample was positive, she would have been given the choice to open the B sample, so if she made that decision, they'd want to be sure that B was clean by swapping out the sample.She was not on the "Duchess" list of athletes who were state approved dopers/had clean samples in storage/had their vials automatically swapped by Russian security in the middle of the night, but perhaps they swapped the B sample after she requested that it be opened?
imagine how gold's trajectory might have been different if she was the sochi bronze medallist...That makes sense. If her A sample was positive, she would have been given the choice to open the B sample, so if she made that decision, they'd want to be sure that B was clean by swapping out the sample.
I would imagine even more pressure from her family, the USFS, the media, etc would have been heaped on her. I don't even want to contemplate a possible different trajectory for her under additional pressure and expectations - not especially knowing what the level of pressure she had on her DID to her health as well as the incoming juggernaut that was Team Tutberidze.imagine how gold's trajectory might have been different if she was the sochi bronze medallist...
Gold referred to this in an interview. She said the sample taking room was chaos with lots of unauthorized people there. She recognized this was completely incorrect and that probably some form of cheating was going on. The girl`s not stupid.imagine how gold's trajectory might have been different if she was the sochi bronze medallist...
Yeah, but at Sochi she was just off a nationals win and appeared to be excited to be there. The troubles came later when she had to fight her way back and prove she was a champion. What every elite woman skater is realizing is that between the doping and crazy, unhealthy training practices by the Russians winning after Sochi was near impossible.I would imagine even more pressure from her family, the USFS, the media, etc would have been heaped on her. I don't even want to contemplate a possible different trajectory for her under additional pressure and expectations - not especially knowing what the level of pressure she had on her DID to her health as well as the incoming juggernaut that was Team Tutberidze.
Maybe some nations just know their way around it, that's why? Just recently, Jessica Calalang was cleared, as she managed to prove that the forbidden substance was suddenly in her lotion or makeup that she always used. Norwegians don't have many figure skaters, but Norwegian skiers are notorious for having asthma and, therefore, therapeutic exemptions. My favorite recent case, however, is that of a European athlete who was cleared because she proved that the banned substance was in her dog's medicine. As for high-profile figure skaters from other countries, is Laurine Lecavalier not banned from competing? The Spanish pair skater Laura Barquero under investigation is an Olympian and a high-profile athlete for her country as well.And you are still missing the overall point I was making. When 75% of the skaters serving a doping suspension are Russian, that's indicative of a larger problem. One would think, if the problem is merely no-name, limited-talent athletes doping that there would be some US, Canadian, Dutch, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Norwegian, and French skaters on the list, in addition to the two relatively unknown German and Swiss (well, she's Ameri-Swiss) skaters currently serving a doping suspension. The common thread isn't their level of success but their nationality.
The only testing would be by RUSADA, or the anti-doping agency in the country in which they are training.Does anyone know? With Russia out of ISU competitions are their skaters still being tested for doping - besides by Russian Fed?
There was no forbidden substance in her makeup. Calalang tested positive for a metabolite of a forbidden substance, and the product in her makeup also happens to produce the same metabolite.Maybe some nations just know their way around it, that's why? Just recently, Jessica Calalang was cleared, as she managed to prove that the forbidden substance was suddenly in her lotion or makeup that she always used.
Thank you for the clarification. I returned to the source article and also found the following bit:There was no forbidden substance in her makeup. Calalang tested positive for a metabolite of a forbidden substance, and the product in her makeup also happens to produce the same metabolite.
Yes, changes in the regulation due to false positives would seem to be sensible decision.Thank you for the clarification. I returned to the source article and also found the following bit:
"In June, Calalang's attorney, Howard Jacobs, informed Calalang that there were potential changes in rules relating to 4-CPA that were being voted on at the end of September. If those new rules passed, there wouldn't be any violation on her end".
I didn't know that until now, but this was something that was expected, and won't just affect Baram/Toumientsev. This decision is in keeping with previous changes in age-eligibility rules where exceptions were granted to athletes who competed prior to the rule change.Do you know that ISU just introduced an exception for pairs age limits, so Baram and Toumientsev can still be juniors? Not related to doping, but related to the argument. There are always ways around, if needed.
So is your point that skaters from other countries actually get punished when they are caught doping?Maybe some nations just know their way around it, that's why? Just recently, Jessica Calalang was cleared, as she managed to prove that the forbidden substance was suddenly in her lotion or makeup that she always used. Norwegians don't have many figure skaters, but Norwegian skiers are notorious for having asthma and, therefore, therapeutic exemptions. My favorite recent case, however, is that of a European athlete who was cleared because she proved that the banned substance was in her dog's medicine. As for high-profile figure skaters from other countries, is Laurine Lecavalier not banned from competing? The Spanish pair skater Laura Barquero under investigation is an Olympian and a high-profile athlete for her country as well.
Have you read the post I was answering? Please do, and you'll figure out what the argument was and why. The answer to your question is obviously yes: people of different nations, including high-profile figure skaters from various nations - such as France, Spain, and the USA, got caught. Some nations, however, find their way around.So is your point that skaters from other countries actually get punished when they are caught doping?
Who else does it affect among the top contenders? As we know, the US has a problem with the culture of grooming in pair skating. It is caused by many things, including the large age gaps between pair ladies and pair men. This decision to increase the age limit for women, which was initiated as a response to young Russians dominating the ladies, was supposed to protect young women, right? Why then are we not protecting young women from potential grooming, allowing the large age gap to exist, and even enabling it with this new regulation?I didn't know that until now, but this was something that was expected, and won't just affect Baram/Toumientsev.
The age-eligibility rule change had nothing to do with grooming, it was about aligning the rules for pairs, and ice dance with the singles age-eligibility rules. Granting a pass to teams that had trained and competed under the previous rule is entirely in keeping with previous ISU age-eligibility rule changes.Who else does it affect among the top contenders? As we know, the US has a problem with the culture of grooming in pair skating. It is caused by many things, including the large age gaps between pair ladies and pair men. This decision to increase the age limit for women, which was initiated as a response to young Russians dominating the ladies, was supposed to protect young women, right? Why then are we not protecting young women from potential grooming, allowing the large age gap to exist, and even enabling it with this new regulation?
In the past, skaters had been grandfathered in. It's easier in singles, though, while with Dance and Pairs, there are not only two people's ages to consider, but different ages by gender.Granting a pass to teams that had trained and competed under the previous rule is entirely in keeping with previous ISU age-eligibility rule changes.
The top South Korean sports body said Tuesday it will ask the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to investigate a recent doping admission by a Russian figure skater who beat South Korean star Kim Yu-na for the controversial gold at the 2014 Winter Games.
The move by the Korean Sport & Olympic Committee (KSOC) comes in light of a recent acknowledgement by Adelina Sotnikova, the 2014 Olympic women's singles figure skating champion, that she had a positive doping test in 2014, though she was cleared by her second, "B," sample. [...]
The Korea Anti-Doping Agency is gathering relevant data and information," a KSOC official said. "After we collect the information we need, we will ask the IOC to look into Sotnikova's case. She said herself that she tested positive in her A sample but negative in her B sample. This is an extremely rare instance that needs reinvestigation. Since drug testing technology has improved over the years, we think they should be able to find something that they couldn't in the past."