ChelleC
Anti-quad activist
- Messages
- 8,900
Adam was bringing the truth there.
Also, the "you don't walk into Walgreen's and get heart medication" remark is also a zinger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Adam was bringing the truth there.
Yep. He didn't hold back and good on him.Adam was bringing the truth there.
Also, the "you don't walk into Walgreen's and get heart medication" remark is also a zinger.
I've tried that but they stop moving.Can you copy & paste - I copy & paste the emojis here into other places.
Is there a way to post media files or images like on this site?I've tried that but they stop moving.![]()
CAS has registered the Statement of Appeal filed by WADA against RUSADA and Kamila Valieva
![]()
Court of Arbitration for Sport registers appeal filed by WADA against RUSADA
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has registered an appeal filed by the World Anti-Doping Agency against the Russian Anti-Doping Agency in a case inv...www.insidethegames.biz
WADA is seeking a 4 year ban for Valieva and to disqualify all of her results from 12/25/21 onward. I hope they get all of it:
Christine Brennan working on an article quoting USADA:
“Unless WADA expedites the case, which it certainly could do, this could take awhile even though it’s a pretty straightforward case. Under normal CAS process, it easily could be the end of 2023.”
Well, I think it's pretty clear what will happen since the IOC refused to award the medals. If WADA wins the appeal, then Valieva's results are disqualified then Russia gets 0 points for the Women in the TE, so they would drop to 4th behind the US, Japan and Canada. The rest of the team wouldn't be disqualified, but they'd get the same 0 points for not fielding a competitor in one of the disciplines as Germany received when Hase/Seegert had to WD from the TE Pairs SP or Ukraine received when Shmuratko had to WD from the Men's SP.It seems we still actually don't know what would be done with the medals if Valieva were disqualified from the team event. There has been discussion on how that would happen, would the whole team be disqualified, would the points be recalculated, etc. Was that ever made clear?
Or it could work like other team events in which one member is disqualified for doping (eg relays in swimming or track and field) - the whole team is disqualified and every team below them moves up by one placement.Well, I think it's pretty clear what will happen since the IOC refused to award the medals. If WADA wins the appeal, then Valieva's results are disqualified then Russia gets 0 points for the Women in the TE, so they would drop to 4th behind the US, Japan and Canada. The rest of the team wouldn't be disqualified, but they'd get the same 0 points for not fielding a competitor in one of the disciplines as Germany received when Hase/Seegert had to WD from the TE Pairs SP or Ukraine received when Shmuratko had to WD from the Men's SP.
Oh, and Rippon's comment about "disgrace" was above her being ten points ahead of Wakaba Higuchi despite a big step out on her 3A when Higuchi skated clean including a triple Axel
Not to mention, the Romanians never denied giving the medication to Raducan and a few other girls who were also sick. There was no grandpa water cover up story. They straight up admitted that they messed up the dosage because Raducan shouldn't have been given the same dose as Amanar, who was an adult, or perhaps she shouldn't have been given anything at all. And while it's easy to see that people were sympathetic, people weren't exactly demanding that the medal be returned to her, except for fans and other Romanians. I remember an NBC broadcast a year after Sydney where Tim Daggett said something like "yeah I feel for her, but also, we were told to never take cold meds even when we were little kids, so there's that". It's not common for me to agree with Tim, but basically he was saying that she should be held accountable and that being young was not an excuse.
Raducan wasn’t tested after the team final; two of her teammates were.
Raducan’s substance wasn’t performance-enhancing, was allowed in low dosages, and isn’t even banned anymore. And she’s not getting her medal back. I hardly see how the Raducan case somehow validates Valieva.
My understanding is that the Olympic Charter actually addresses this and allows the athletes to choose when they'd like the medal ceremony. Theoretically, it can take place at 1) the next Olympic Games (which would be Paris 2024), 2) the next World Championships in the sport (can't see this happening anytime before Montreal 2024), 3) at the Olympic Headquarters in Lausanne. Personally, I hope the athletes all decide they want to party it up in Paris in 2024 and receive their medals there, especially since it will be the off-season for the ones still competing and they'll really get to enjoy their delayed moment together.Since it's looking more and more likely that this will take much more time than we'd like, I'd actually push to have a the podium ceremony at some time during the 2024 Paris Olympics and fly them all in for those games. It's the least the IOC could do for the athletes who totally missed on the opportunity to cash in and stole their once in a lifetime moment. Though obviously a summer Olympics, everyone's eyes will be glued to sport for those two weeks. Much prefer that than a presentation in a hotel convention center.
Keep in mind that the commentary during the Olympics is heavily scripted by NBC. Maybe not scripted per se, but there are key points they must follow. It always is, in general, but especially during the Olympics and the preceding competitions (nationals, trials). I was surprised that Elfi was actually good when she did commentary for CBC at the Pan Am games after she was dumped by NBC and replaced by Nastia. I always thought she was just nasty and in general just bad (US girl falls on a badly performed ring "oh that element is so incredibly hard"...five minutes later, a Chinese falls on a well executed ring, same element, "I can't believe she'd have such a silly fall on such an easy element).Tim Daggett also mentioned during the 2008 Olympics when they showed a close up of Raducan commentating to "give it [the gold medal] back" so it's hard to know what he's actually thinking.
"We were bringing home a medal for our country, which just felt so much bigger and greater [than any other], and to go home right after the Olympics and show and tell this beautiful medal to people at home who have seen something they never thought was possible - these are the moments I wish we were able to have," Knierim, 31, told BBC Sport.
"The sad part is that nothing will be able to replicate or recreate the moment in Beijing.
"Even if we were to go back to the exact location [to receive the medals], timing is everything and that moment is gone."
"For a lot of elite athletes sometimes the actual trophy or medal, when you get it, goes into a drawer," Knierim said.
"This will not go in a drawer! When we do get our medals I will be sure to display mine in my home and be very proud of it whatever colour it is."
Frazier agreed he would be taking extra care of his, saying: "I'll probably wear it for a good year!"
Frazier is clear that this unprecedented situation must never be allowed to happen again.
"If the committees who make these decisions care about preventing this from happening again, they need to listen to the athletes involved so they can understand first-hand what we're living through and what it felt like to have moments like this, so they understand the severity of it," he said.
...
"It's more about we just wanted that medal and that experience at the Games, so that part was the disappointing part so now it's just about what Team USA and the other countries deserve and that's where we're at."
eyes Morisi's performance and coaching change suspiciously
Note I used “possible” so am not stating known facts here!
And going back to Gordeava and Grinkov and questioned if doping could possibly have had a part in his death, since doping in Russian athletics goes back a long way.
I think the gaslighting from the Russians on the doping issue has gotten to the point where a lot of people are just questioning everything, and that's where I think that line of thought was coming from.Not directing this at you because I know you’re just recapping what was discussed on TSL, but ugh, that’s a really cheap line of speculation even by TSL’s standards. Maybe Russian/Soviet skaters (and/or skaters from other countries) were doping in that era, who knows. But the medical factors involved in Grinkov’s death were discussed extensively in the media at the time, and I don’t recall that anything at the time indicated any kind of substance use would have played a role. Trying to get a little more mileage out of a highly-publicized tragedy with absolutely no evidence, when Grinkov still has family and friends in the sport who miss him, is pretty gross IMO.
The gaslighting is definitely the worst part. Making it sound like anyone who calls them out is the one in the wrong.I think the gaslighting from the Russians on the doping issue has gotten to the point where a lot of people are just questioning everything, and that's where I think that line of thought was coming from.
I think the gaslighting from the Russians on the doping issue has gotten to the point where a lot of people are just questioning everything, and that's where I think that line of thought was coming from.
That's not what I took from what was said, but even in this thread there is confusion about how Grinkov died because @Ananas Astra said it was a congenital heart condition, but he died of a heart attack caused by a narrowed artery due to heart disease. So I think the issue is that it's been almost 3 decades, and the details aren't salient in people's mind, and mid-conversation we are prone reach for connections that aren't actually there.I get that completely. And honestly, as much as I was a G&G fan as a teenager, I probably wouldn’t even blink if someone just said “Maybe Grinkov was doping.” Maybe he was. Maybe they all were. But “Maybe Grinkov was doping, and that’s his real cause of death,” without any evidence whatsoever and with prior statements to the contrary by medical doctors, is tacky clickbait. We can talk about the Russian fed’s long track record of cheating without exploiting a tragedy just to add extra drama.
The "narrowed artery" was caused by a congenital heart condition. Doctors discovered it while doing the autopsy and also did some further research. IIRC, when they announced their findings, they termed it the "Grinkov risk factor."That's not what I took from what was said, but even in this thread there is confusion about how Grinkov died because @Ananas Astra said it was a congenital heart condition, but he died of a heart attack caused by a narrowed artery due to heart disease. So I think the issue is that it's been almost 3 decades, and the details aren't salient in people's mind, and mid-conversation we are prone reach for connections that aren't actually there.
That's not what the article says, but, more to the point, a debate about the factors that lead to his death are not the issue here.The "narrowed artery" was caused by a congenital heart condition. Doctors discovered it while doing the autopsy and also did some further research. IIRC, when they announced their findings, they termed it the "Grinkov risk factor."
ETA: https://apnews.com/article/3aa03941f98fc9a425fe80ba6583ffb5
In other words, they made up stuff to get attention, and you gave it to them.The Skating Lesson on YouTube - they had an interesting conversation about the Russian ladies this year suddenly not skating up to last year’s standard.
And going back to Gordeava and Grinkov and questioned if doping could possibly have had a part in his death, since doping in Russian athletics goes back a long way. They also talked about a possible political and economic web between coaches, oligarchs, etc. Best to listen donut yourself and make your own judgements.
Note I used “possible” so am not stating known facts here!
I don't think this is a fair characterization of what DL was doing in his most recent "As the Blade Turns". He has been pointing out, for quite some time, well before the Valieva scandal, actually, that there is systemic doping in Russian skating and has been for decades. The attitude within the Russian skating establishment supports that basic premise - freely admitting in the past that they're looking for replacements for now-banned drugs that aid in recovery time and stamina. For too long, up until Valieva, actually, the attitude from many people within figure skating is "there aren't really any PEDs for figure skating," but that particular drug cocktail she had in her test results would indicate otherwise. It feels to me, as though the Russians have been gaslighting the rest of the skating world for far too long on the subject.In other words, they made up stuff to get attention, and you gave it to them.
There’s no need to listen to unsupported gossip