MsZem
I see the sea
- Messages
- 18,495
And while everyone is hanging out on the balcony, Zara Tindall is busy elsewhere.
I wonder if she now regrets giving Kate only three weeks between the birth of Louis and her wedding?
No, it's not. Harry and Meghan became engaged when Kate was already pregnant with Louis. And I imagine that having been pregnant and given birth herself, Meghan now has a better appreciation of how challenging it must have been for Kate and Zara to attend the wedding so near to giving birth.Your comment is equivalent to someone questioning why Kate chose to get pregnant with her third child when she did.
Why in the hell would you share this filth? Do you think or want anyone here to believe it? When we click on websites like these we are just supporting crap. These ppl get paid from ad companies for # of clicks.
Quora is a Q & A site. Only employees get paid to write there and something tells me that nutcase is not a Quora employee. We're not doing anything for her. As for sharing it, I think some of us are interested in a purely watching a train wreck sort of way. I am interested in how they respond when their theories continually fall apart. Meghan is clearly carrying baby weight for example, so the ones still insisting she was never pregnant are trying to dance around that today and it's not going well for them. There was also a "she's under house arrest and about to be thrown out of the UK" thing out there and so, obviously, she wouldn't be seen at Trooping today. And there she was. So now they'll have to find a new theory.
@canbelto I've seen a number of comments around the web trying to link Meghan to all kinds of stuff. I strongly suspect that those who start bringing in political things are the ones motivated by racism.
The Cambridges looked fantastic today. Louis is a character and Camilla & Charles are obviously good grandparents who spend time with the children or he wouldn't have interacted with them as he did. I could have lived without Sophie's hat. Camilla looked great and so did Bea. And if I read that Meghan looked "radiant" and "stunning" one more time, I may vomit. She looked fine. But no one looks radiant in navy. She looked tired and the outfit was a little more boring than boring. It's spring Meghan. Dress for spring. I feel like she or her terrible stylist needs a color chart for the seasons or something.
Seriously?
Right, as usual, everything negative under the sun we can lay at Meghan's feet. You aren't making any sense at all with such a comment. Such ridiculousness is the furthest thing from either Kate's or Meghan's minds, believe me! Not to mention that neither Harry nor Meghan had exclusive say over which day they would be scheduled to be married. SMH on a rotisserie!
Your comment is equivalent to someone questioning why Kate chose to get pregnant with her third child when she did.
George has some Michael Middleton in him, and Charlotte looks to me like a mix of Windsor and Carole Middleton.As for the Cambridge children George and Charlotte look so Windsor, and Louis looks very Middleton. I don't see any Spencer in any of the kids. Charlotte looks sort of like Queen Elizabeth.
She looked spectacular. HM "stood out".There is a great closeup of the Queen’s outfit. The fabric is lovely!
Re Meghan, it's not so much the color as it is the combination of color and shape, I think. A different neckline, a lighter fabric, or a bit of a print would have done the trick. And a better hat.
You are probably right, but again, she gave birth a month ago, the fact that she showed up and looked presentable is enough for me.
Generally speaking, it is interesting to me how she has relied so heavily on black, navy, and cream. It may just be caution. Still feeling a bit unsure of the waters so to speak. It will be fun to see how her style grows of the next few years.
I liked the dress for the photocall with Archie much better on her, though that is really not a Trooping the Colour type look.You are probably right, but again, she gave birth a month ago, the fact that she showed up and looked presentable is enough for me.
I've known many women who spent their lives buying identical looking black or navy blue dresses. It really seems to be a thing some women prefer -- to wear black, navy blue, cream, and other neutrals. It's sort of like Kate and her beige pumps -- she must have 10 or 20 similar looking beige pumps.
No, it's not. Harry and Meghan became engaged when Kate was already pregnant with Louis.
And I imagine that having been pregnant and given birth herself, Meghan now has a better appreciation of how challenging it must have been for Kate and Zara to attend the wedding so near to giving birth...
Clearly, whoever did decide on the date was not thinking about how hard it would be on William and Kate, and Kate specifically.
She does not appear to the kind to hold a grudge or worry about the past. My comment was simply now that Meghan knows what it is like to go through giving birth and have a newborn, she may have reflected back and be grateful she has such a supportive sister-in-law. By suggesting she would never think back on such a thing you are painting Meghan in a negative light. I suspect it went through her mind as she was choosing her outfit...
Well dark colors might hide a post-baby bump that in older women like Meghan is harder to get rid of quickly. I am not saying Meghan has anything to be ashamed of...
And if I read that Meghan looked "radiant" and "stunning" one more time, I may vomit. She looked fine. But no one looks radiant in navy. She looked tired and the outfit was a little more boring than boring. It's spring Meghan.
Well dark colors might hide a post-baby bump that in older women like Meghan is harder to get rid of quickly. I am not saying Meghan has anything to be ashamed of, just that a loose navy blue dress might be the sort of thing someone who just had a baby might be more comfortable in. As for Meghan's color palette she is clearly one of those women who lives for black, navy blue, and cream.
Quora is a Q&A site and I contribute quite a bit. These nutty conspiracy theories are just funny to me. For instance, @PDilemma is right -- the conspiracy theorists could explain Meghan's pregnancy bump with a pillow, but are having a harder time explaining away the fact that Meghan is fuller figured all over post-pregnancy.
@aftershocks, no offense but you're going on my ignore list. I come to this thread for lighthearted fashion royal chat and maybe a bit of gossip. Your PhD dissertations are just boring now.
... posters here are not out to get Meghan.
There is hope for Meghan yet!
She may have not wanted to call attention to herself before all of the pregnancy weight disappears.
aftershocks said:What??? You have got to be kidding! Your comment is all kinds of WTF, and apparently you don't even realize it.
@aftershocks, no offense but you're going on my ignore list. I come to this thread for lighthearted fashion royal chat and maybe a bit of gossip. Your PhD dissertations are just boring now.
full speed ahead, with gratitude and giving back to others always on her radar.
Kate looked quite lovely three weeks after giving birth to Prince Louis last year. In recent months, Kate has seemed to me to be overly thin, but maybe that's her normal build.
Malicious gossip disgusts me.I come here for lighthearted fashion royal chat