Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are going to be getting a lot of angry emails now.
And I hope they ignore them.
They had criteria. They applied the criteria. They did their job.
Note that -- if the list is accurate - at least 2 athlete representatives voted to send Adam over Ross. Possibly all three athlete reps did. 11-1 was not an especially contentious vote.
Peggy graham rippon sp score 97.15Interesting to note:
Kevin Rosenstein was on the judging panel for the ladies competition
Peggy Graham was on the judging panel for the ladies and pairs competition
Wendy Enzmann was the technical controller for the pairs competition
But obviously if members of the selection committee are shown to have been writing “love letters” to rippon they should have recused themselves entirely!! I want to know how razzano voted! Did he vote for his best friend brother or whatever!!Even if the criteria have weights that will not keep the angry fans from mad if it means making a silver medalist a second alternate at best. Because the bulk of the argument is about the athletes feelings.
Having said that skating is not a popular sport. Other than the 50 or 100 people who follow this closely and passionately and are mad about this, there doesn't seem an outrage in the media. While you can always fine tune the criteria to improve it, I will say I have no plans to email Rachael flatt to question her vote. Lord knows she's knows this stuff better than I do. It is kinda like the public emailing an isu judge and question their marks.
But obviously if members of the selection committee are shown to have been writing “love letters” to rippon they should have recused themselves entirely!! I want to know how razzano voted! Did he vote for his best friend brother or whatever!!
No thanks!Consider taking a chill pill. Seriously.
If there are 12 people and vote was 11-1 it means no recusal@caseyedwards before you go quad! quad! quadding! about Razzano, one member of the committee DID recuse themself. It was in one of the articles. We obviously don't know who it was, but maybe just maybe it was Razzano.
So? It’s horrible wrong and offensive.I also think it is unfair to Ross given he has silver, not bronze, medal....
But will you stop it, guys! It's a done deal.
https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6fIRb1gYFbZtxKso/giphy.gif
From Jackie Wong: http://www.rockerskating.com/news/2...championships-part-1-making-sense-of-criteriaIf there are 12 people and vote was 11-1 it means no recusal
In the end, the decision was 11-1 in the 13-person committee, with one person in the committee presumably abstaining from the vote.
Where is he getting 13? He doesn’t say.
The individuals named in the post are on the Singles Discipline Group. The full membership of the international committee, which is composed of a Dance, Paris, Singles, and International Committee Management Subcommittee can be found on page 15-16 of the provided link. In past years, the previous chair of the International Committee was an ex-officio member of the committee. I do not know whether that is still the case or not. If I learn more from the source that provided me the directory, I will share accordingly. Same goes for if I learn with more certainty who cast the lone dissenting vote....
For me the abstention is interesting... so If the abstention was due to conflict of interest because he/she was associated with a certain skater up for selection, then did this person not t know before that tge said skater was competing at the nationals, or did s/he just have a sudden revelation. Even if s/he didn’t vote in the selection, but s/he had plenty of opportunity to get their view acrosss and influence the decision. So, they still influenced the decision.
I honestly thought some of the committee would be some of the USFSA people who were hired for their business acumen, not their skating history.
repeating it 100 times does not solve it. if you have evidence there is cheating or wrong-doing, take it to proper channels.....So? It’s horrible wrong and offensive.
Unless s/he didn’t take part at any meeting where the discussion of Olympic men’s team was discussed your point is valid. At the moment, they are trying to deflect negative press than do the right thing. S/he would have had other opportunities provided they BOW ...I'm sure they all knew who was competing at Nationals. What they didn't know before Nationals was what the results would be and what subset of the competitors the committee would have to decide among.
If in fact one committee member recused themselves from the men's Olympic team decision, or all the men's assignments for the rest of this season, that doesn't mean they would have to resign from the committee.
Wasn't the decision made that night, shortly after the event concluded? Not much time for someone to "have plenty of opportunity to get their view across and influence the decision" if they recused themselves from that decision.