Music rights clearance issues (policy being implemented by the ISU starting in 2024)

FWIW, I spoke to choreographer at Nationals in St. Louis who told me that they've heard that many Russian junior skaters are using AI-generated music for their programs these days." :slinkaway
Haven’t been following Russian juniors for a while now, but personally haven’t heard or seen anything regarding it in press and among the fans /various telegram channels
 
Haven’t been following Russian juniors for a while now, but personally haven’t heard or seen anything regarding it in press and among the fans /various telegram channels
IIRC, there may be a database of AI-generated music in Russia that’s being utilized? If you do ever hear and/or see anything along these lines, please let us know.
 
IIRC, there may be a database of AI-generated music in Russia that’s being utilized? If you do ever hear and/or see anything along these lines, please let us know.
That doesn't make any sense, since the point of AI music is you can create it to your individual specifications (ie, in this case Gummenik's music wasn't cleared so Moskvina created AI music with the same accents, which he declined). It sounds like a rumor.
 
Catching up on threads. Samuelson/Bates did a Chicks OD in 2010. And it was awesome.

Okay, so those are twizzles that "don't move at all." I mean, they seriously looked like spins because they were done in place.

Until the lawsuits start happening for copyright infringement which is inevitably going to happen with AI music.
You can't copyright AI music so there will never be rights issues with it.

If courts decide that Generative AI violates copyrights, that would be different but I don't think they will. That is because, if implemented correctly, Generative AI doesn't copy the music from its source and store it locally to refer to. Instead, it "listens" to it and stores notations about it.

It's basically the same as you listening to a bunch of songs and making notes about them as you are listening. Of course, computers do this a million times faster than we do and they can read their "notes" (mathematical notations) much faster too.
 
Okay, so those are twizzles that "don't move at all." I mean, they seriously looked like spins because they were done in place.


You can't copyright AI music so there will never be rights issues with it.

If courts decide that Generative AI violates copyrights, that would be different but I don't think they will. That is because, if implemented correctly, Generative AI doesn't copy the music from its source and store it locally to refer to. Instead, it "listens" to it and stores notations about it.

It's basically the same as you listening to a bunch of songs and making notes about them as you are listening. Of course, computers do this a million times faster than we do and they can read their "notes" (mathematical notations) much faster too.
There's a big lawsuit going for authors because AI used thousands of books to "train" itself without permission from the authors and publishers. The same could happen with music.
 
There's a big lawsuit going for authors because AI used thousands of books to "train" itself without permission from the authors and publishers. The same could happen with music.

My sister's publisher reached out to her a while ago to let her know she's an eligible author so she joined the lawsuit. Her book was a highly technical (highly outdated!) guide that was recently scanned by LLMs, which you know- garbage in, garbage out. If they win she will only be awarded around $2,000.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information