blue_idealist
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,641
I voted for Lepisto. She was a lovely skater, but IIRC, there were lots of double jumps in her medal-winning long program.
oh
my
god
that was possibly the longest four minutes of my life. I can't believe this was 1991! Everything about that video, from the hair, dress, music, styling, 2 triples, choreography screams early 80s to me, not early 90s.
Thank god they got rid of figures, the sport would probably be more dead than it already is.
ok we've progressed from 1981 to 1988. The energy was.definitely there!In contrast, Holly had a shockingly energetic original program (short program) with a lot of speed and power that allowed one to overlook any flaws in style.
Toller Cranston on CBC would have usually torn Holly apart because of her style but he had to admit she performed with superior energy.
Soldatova skated well, but the 4th and 5th place finishers skated well, with just one less triple jump. And I actually liked the Aladdin program!To be fair Soldatova had pretty solid tech content for that event - a clean 3S+3T, with just a fall on a 3F<. Even though her salchows were WHACK. All in all she did 6 clean triples and even though her program was tacky as hell, her closest competition was Malinina's Aladdin which was a legendary $hitfe$t in its own right.
What’s most telling is the point totals of 2 of her combos!! Omg this is realI voted for Lepisto. She was a lovely skater, but IIRC, there were lots of double jumps in her medal-winning long program.
That’s true but it’s also true of everyone on this whole list really! It’s like when you look at these performances and these jumps and or programs which is the most yikes in one way or another. Maybe compared to their best? Maybe what was usual for the era? For the era in 2010 3 triple long was beyond.Hey man, the Olympics took a lot out of people. You guys can make fun of how she won that metal all you want, there were a lot of good skaters that could not outscore her.
This is a poll about the most underwhelming bronze medal since 1991. Discussing the reasons why someone picked Lepisto isn't exactly shocking or new for FSU. I picked her too for both the TES she did complete and the fact that it actually earned her a medal.Hey man, the Olympics took a lot out of people. You guys can make fun of how she won that metal all you want, there were a lot of good skaters that could not outscore her.
In contrast, Holly had a shockingly energetic original program (short program) with a lot of speed and power that allowed one to overlook any flaws in style.
Toller Cranston on CBC would have usually torn Holly apart because of her style but he had to admit she performed with superior energy.
I would rewatch Holly Cook’s short program over many other skaters. Whoever choreographed that would be deserving of an ISU Award for choreography today.
rude!Where's Alysa Liu? Should be on the list
What was unique about 10 Worlds was that so many skaters in the LP were more inspiring than the actual medalist Lepisto: Any of Phaneuf, Ando and Kostner would have been more memorable bronze medalists. And yes, a better 2A from Mirai would have come out in front.Uh oh. Hell just froze over. CaseyDesanctimoniusEdwards and I agree on something.
I’ve long been annoyed Lepisto win bronze, mostly bc everyone else also imploded. I was especially bummed for Mirai. Had she landed a double axel, she would have been third. The tech content of that era up through 2012 worlds was pretty lackluster with not many 3/3s from women. And not many with the 7 triple/full 3 up to lutz arsenal.