Mass Shooting at LGBT Nightclub in Orlando

I told Aussie Willy her post was ridiculous, more or less, and BR told you to back off. Did I miss something somewhere about everyone else staying out of it?
Do you know what is ridiculous? These things continue to happen (ie mass shootings) and every time they happen those in the US continue to ask "Why did this happen?" The rest of us in the world sit there and look at the US (because if gets so much media coverage outside your country) and continue to go "WTF? It is the guns that are the problem". It is such a no-brainer and other countries have managed to do something about the issue.

Yes there are a many reasons why it would be more difficult in the US to deal with it, but you should maybe understand why it does become a joke to the rest of the planet.

Those of us outside of the US are fully entitled to comment because what happens there actually impacts on the rest of the world.

And also I am visiting the US next month so this doesn't impact on me either. Should I be worried about it?
 
Do you know what is ridiculous? These things continue to happen (ie mass shootings) and every time they happen those in the US continue to ask "Why did this happen?" The rest of us in the world sit there and look at the US (because if gets so much media coverage outside your country) and continue to go "WTF? It is the guns that are the problem". It is such a no-brainer and other countries have managed to do something about the issue.

Yes there are a many reasons why it would be more difficult in the US to deal with it, but you should maybe understand why it does become a joke to the rest of the planet.

How nice that you see this as a joke. Thankfully you do not speak for the rest of the planet.

The repeated insinuation that other countries have done something while the US has done nothing is really not helpful, and serves to demonstrate that certain folks are rather uninformed (perhaps willfully so?) about what is actually going on in the US, including recent gun control laws at the state level and executive orders at the federal level. Maybe we aren't acting fast enough, but to imply that we aren't doing anything is ridiculous.
 
I appreciate your post balletmaus.

As I said, my reply was based on impressions I get through the media; reports that make it sound like there's talk but no action, reports about protests against gay marriage when it was made legal, protests against the treatment of African Americans after Michael Brown (and others) were shot, protests against abortion in front of abortion clinics. So many protests are reported on and yet there has not been one report of protests for gun control after a shooting. However, I forgot to ask why. I simply assumed there are no protests, but I should have asked why I wasn't hearing about it. Am I not hearing about it because there are no protests, and if there aren’t, why not? Or are there protests and I simply don't hear about it? And if I do not hear about it then why don’t I hear about it?

To my knowledge there have not been many street protests regarding legislation on guns. I think that the approach has primarily been through lobbying and education. Here are some groups that are hard at work on the issue:

http://americansforresponsiblesolutions.org/
http://everytown.org/
http://www.bradycampaign.org/
http://csgv.org/
 
Do you know what is ridiculous? These things continue to happen (ie mass shootings) and every time they happen those in the US continue to ask "Why did this happen?" The rest of us in the world sit there and look at the US (because if gets so much media coverage outside your country) and continue to go "WTF? It is the guns that are the problem". It is such a no-brainer and other countries have managed to do something about the issue.

Yes there are a many reasons why it would be more difficult in the US to deal with it, but you should maybe understand why it does become a joke to the rest of the planet.

Those of us outside of the US are fully entitled to comment because what happens there actually impacts on the rest of the world.

And also I am visiting the US next month so this doesn't impact on me either. Should I be worried about it?

This post is full of wow and not in a good way.
 
The thing @Aussie Willy is that you make the same posts over and over and over each time there is news of a shooting.

May I ask, do you think we didn't read your posts before? Do you actually think we forgot since the last time that Australia has banned guns? Do you think we'll understand this time in some way we didn't before?

It kind of sounds like you are yelling at us like you think we are fcking stupid to be honest.

And FTR, I support everyone's right to post unless Sharpie tells them not to. I support everyone's right to read my posts that ask for thoughtfulness and empathy as stupid shit if they want. I support everyone's right to aggravate the fcking hell out of a bunch of Americans and then be offended when the aggravated snap back at you. Absolutely you have those rights. I won't even judge you on it to be honest, I've posted plenty of shit here myself.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it is a no-brainer. In my opinion the problems in the USA caused by their gun culture are more likely to be solved by reducing the enormous fear of crime, improving opportunities for education and reducing poverty, than they are by banning guns. What worked in Australia won't necessarily succeed in another nation.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't help that gun sales go up after these horrific shooting-sprees. I read a couple of articles about that this morning. Some people rush out to buy hand guns to "protect themselves" and others buy assault weapons "while they still can." And the weapons industry refers to these ghastly events as "opportunities". It's all quite sickening.
 
I just saw on a local blog that Seattle police are offering LGBTQ venues training on how to deal with an active shooter in preparation for Pride events. I really never expected that to be part of Pride in this city.
 
Last week I was happy to see that Javier Raya came out as gay, as did other elite athletes. And now, not only this, but hate-mongering "pastors" in California and Arizona are applauding this crime against humanity and calling for more. I think I need to lay off the news for a while.
 
Yes there are a many reasons why it would be more difficult in the US to deal with it, but you should maybe understand why it does become a joke to the rest of the planet.

Not a joke. A tragedy.

And in this case, the shooter was already on an FBI watch-list for terrorism. The fact that such a person can get his hands on an assault weapon with the intention of committing mass murder makes it look like the gun control measures that are the joke.

The absence of background checks for potential gun purchasers is absurd. It appears that a terrorist can buy a guy in the US more easily than an underage person can buy alcohol at a liquor store in Canada (the stores are government run BTW, and ID is required for proof of age).
 
How is a gun store owner supposed to know someone was investigated by the FBI? Investigated but never charged with anything as there wasn't sufficient evidence to do anything. If he wasn't arrested, local police wouldn't know anything about him. Once again, foreigners seem not to understand the difference between State and Federal govennments in the US. The freaking local police don't even have access to federal databases. There is an acknowledge lack of information sharing among the many different law enforcement agencies. This is what annoys me. The US is huge with multiple layers of law enforcement who don't always, in fact most of the time, don't share information. I'm so glad the rest of the world is so safe. Except it isn't. But, if all of you are afraid to come to the US, fine. Stay home and be safe. And background checks are often a joke. We do them on our students and they consist of internet searches which turn up nothing. We laugh at the results, but then we don't pay much for the checks.
 
I'm sure someone will be along soon to pushback against Xela M's post above (eta. yep it's already there.)

It certainly creates an impression that if you aren't American, you need to not comment here.
Xela M quoted a post by rfisher & asked her a question, yet when rfisher responded, you identify it as "pushback". I read it as rfisher answered a question that was asked. The addition of "yep it's already there" sounds off the mark for a timely response to a question that has been posed.
 
Sorry, but those Americans who refuse to acknowledge that your gun laws are a massive problem need serious help.

I went to Vegas with a friend last year and there was a guy from Texas we hung out with and (apart from literally knowing nothing about Europe) he simply couldn't believe that we couldn't just go out an buy guns here. He kept repeating "But you're allowed to have guns inside your house, right?" Errr... no you dimwit we are not and it has worked out so far. Shootings in Europe are a huge exception to the rule, and guns are not the weapon of choice even in crime-ridden places like London!

There simply are no realistic circumstances in which an ordinary person would need to carry a gun!
 
Last edited:
How nice that you see this as a joke. Thankfully you do not speak for the rest of the planet.

The repeated insinuation that other countries have done something while the US has done nothing is really not helpful, and serves to demonstrate that certain folks are rather uninformed (perhaps willfully so?) about what is actually going on in the US, including recent gun control laws at the state level and executive orders at the federal level. Maybe we aren't acting fast enough, but to imply that we aren't doing anything is ridiculous.

Unfortunately, the world is very well informed about what is going on in the US. Donald Trump has been nominated to run for President.

If that's not a worrying message to the rest of the world about the state of affairs in the US, I don't know what is...
 
How is a gun store owner supposed to know someone was investigated by the FBI? Investigated but never charged with anything as there wasn't sufficient evidence to do anything. If he wasn't arrested, local police wouldn't know anything about him. Once again, foreigners seem not to understand the difference between State and Federal govennments in the US. The freaking local police don't even have access to federal databases. There is an acknowledge lack of information sharing among the many different law enforcement agencies. This is what annoys me. The US is huge with multiple layers of law enforcement who don't always, in fact most of the time, don't share information. I'm so glad the rest of the world is so safe. Except it isn't. But, if all of you are afraid to come to the US, fine. Stay home and be safe. And background checks are often a joke. We do them on our students and they consist of internet searches which turn up nothing. We laugh at the results, but then we don't pay much for the checks.

:confused: Yeah, we realise that a shop keeper would not know if a person had any issues. That's kind of the problem there. Since it's impossible to get through all these complex layers of information and do proper background checks, surely the only plausible solution would be to stop selling guns to private individuals! Duh...
 
The thing @Aussie Willy is that you make the same posts over and over and over each time there is news of a shooting.

So does everyone, with regards to guns anyway. That's the tragedy. Every time it's the same "discussion". Then it dies down until the next time.

So what is happening to change this in the US? Are there protests? Are more people voting? Are people contacting their members of congress? It is the same discussion every time - but that's not just from non Americans - it's from everyone. Pro guns people say if so and so was armed it would be better, anti guns say we don't need the gun that was used, and everything in between.

So I'm asking honestly, what are you doing about it? What is your neighbour, community, friends and family doing about it? What is your state, your local congressman etc. doing about it? What is your country doing about it?

Because from where I stand, it's nothing. Prayers and thought and vigils and talk isn't changing anything. I'm not saying you're doing nothing, just that it seems like that. So what are you (collective you) doing to change the discussion and the situation?

If the majority of the people want change, how do they make that happen in the US? Do the majority of the people want change? Seems some (many?) believe that arming more people is the answer, and others want less, or a restriction on guns. So there's the stalemate.

And yes, it's hard as a non-American to see these tragedies happen as well. And it is hard to see the same discussion with no obvious changes. The US is a hugely powerful country, and yet the only one with this problem.

When I bring up Australia's solution, it isn't to rub anyone's face in it, it's to give hope that there is a solution. Is it the same solution for every country? No, probably not, like I said we don't have the same gun culture (or second amendment) in Australia. But there must be a solution. When I hear people say "we can't do that" it pisses me off (like when people say you can't change the second amendment- yes, you can. It's really hard and complicated, and may not be the best way to go, but it is possible). It's especially annoying to be dismissed without coming up with something else. So it's hard to change the second amendment, what can you do instead?

The US *can* do things to fix this. It's not going to be easy, in fact it'll be hard and complicated, and you'll need a majority of people (or at least a lot of powerful people), but to just say things can't happen is not going to change anything.

To dismiss non-Americans views is also not the right way - God knows, the US needs all the help it can get, and maybe it does take some outside views to help give some hope and make some change.

It always looks to me - as an outsider - that the same discussion comes up each time there is a tragedy and then dies down until the next tragedy. I always think it's better having these discussions - actual discussion to talk solutions and try and reach a compromise - when emotions aren't running so high (which is actually the opposite of what happened in Australia, our leaders took advantage of high emotions to change things).

Has anyone in this thread changed their mind about what changes should happen since the last thread like this? Has any politician changed their view (either way) since? Do Americans in general feel that the situation is hopeless? Honestly, it is hard to think things will ever change, and that could be why things aren't - it's hard to keep fighting when you don't see any results. :(

I'm usually in favour of discussions, and I think something good to come of out this is the open support for the LGBT community. I'm sad to read that the support and discussion may not be there on a smaller scale in workplaces and neighbourhoods.
 
Except a lot of us are not hanging out in Vegas with an ill informed gun owner from Texas. A lot of us do not own guns, acknowledge that guns are a massive problem, & vote accordingly for our representatives in every election. If someone can only find gun toting "dimwits" to hang out with in Vegas & only reads opinions or news about Trump & his supporters, it is not necessarily a statement about the make up of the total U.S. citizenry but something else entirely.
 
Last edited:
So I'm asking honestly, what are you doing about it? What is your neighbour, community, friends and family doing about it? What is your state, your local congressman etc. doing about it? What is your country doing about it?

Because from where I stand, it's nothing. Prayers and thought and vigils and talk isn't changing anything. I'm not saying you're doing nothing, just that it seems like that.

It isn't so hard to find out what is happening in the US in terms of efforts (and some results) related to gun control. Well, it isn't hard if someone actually wants to find out.

As I've said, it isn't enough, but it sure isn't nothing.

BTW, vigils are a form of protest in cases like this. I am sorry you see protests as "nothing."
 
People are constantly fighting for stricter gun control. Many states have passed strict gun control laws. People acknowledge that it's a long, hard fight since we're fighting a whole cultural attitude on guns (and differing opinions within that culture). People need to look at the progress made and all the victories (big and small) before stating nothing has happened or that people aren't doing anything. The ones who are fighting have been doing so vigilantly and will continue to do so.
 
Except a lot of us are not hanging out in Vegas with an ill informed gun owner from Texas. A lot of us do not own guns, acknowledge that guns are a massive problem, & vote accordingly for our representatives in every election. If someone can only find gun toting "dimwits" to hang out with in Vegas & only reads opinions or news about Trump & his supporters, it is not necessarily a statement about the make up of the total U.S. citizenry but something else entirely.

That's why I specifically said "those Americans who refuse to acknowledge that your gun laws are a massive problem". And Trump was not just elected by a few nutters, but by millions of Americans. If you think there's nothing worrying about that. Fine. But Europe is certainly worried.
 
I posted this NY public radio article earlier in this thread: http://www.northcountrypublicradio....ines-states-like-ny-take-on-gun-control-fight
A lot of states, including big states like New York and California, have already banned or severely restricted the sale of military-style rifles like the one used in the Florida night club.
...
"The state level ban is where the action is for gun control today," said Adam Winkler, a law professor at UCLA who wrote a book about the gun control debate called “Gun Fight.” He said New York isn’t alone in going after these weapons. "People constantly say, oh, nothing has ever changed, we’re at a complete stalemate on guns. And if you only look at Congress, that’s right. But since Newtown, we’ve seen a wave of legislation at the state level, including restrictive new laws in California, Washington, Oregon, Colorado."
Re. the ongoing "filibuster" in the Senate: http://www.npr.org/2016/06/15/482224176/senate-gun-control-speeches-recall-an-old-school-filibuster
Right now, all those senators out there talking the night away are not really trying to stop a particular bill from being passed — or prevent a vote or a debate on it. There is already a bill on the floor under consideration, an appropriations bill that most of the Senate will eventually vote for.
But the long-winded speeches this evening do have a serious intent. They are trying to draw attention to the state of gun control legislation in the wake of the Orlando massacre. They are calling for universal background checks and people on "no fly" watch lists at airports. These ideas have popular support in polls but have been opposed by Second Amendment advocates, also known as the gun lobby.
ETA: Senator Christopher Murphy, junior senator from Connecticut (state where the Sandy Hook massacre took place), is leading the proceedings today (debate has gone on for almost 9 hours now).
 
Last edited:
BTW, vigils are a form of protest in cases like this. I am sorry you see protests as "nothing."

Actually from the small know of people I know who went to some of the vigils in the US, they went as the opposite of a protest - they went to mourn and support their community, not to protest. So while you may consider vigils a form of protest, not everyone does. Some want to separate the protest from the mourning.
 
I think a lot of people in the US know that gun control is an issue.
But they are right it isn't that simple to find a solution.
Because of what a poster up thread said of there being
State and federal
Laws.
And I'm guessing no national data base for gun registry.
There is an inordinate amount of people and groups lobbying on both sides.
It is also often not talked about in real politics when it gets down to the nitty gritty, i.e election time Because it is a deadlock.
And congress and the house are often politically at odds.
And either party risks losing either house because of it.
I agree assault rifles need to go.
But the NRA isn't going to go for it I am assuming.

As for the constitution, yes it was written in there,But my issue with that being an argument is that when the constitution was written was when the citizens of the US were facing war with Britain and the fact that a lot of the US was still undeveloped and people had to have guns to protect themselves and their land.
But using that as an iron clad argument isn't really addressing the fact that it is doubtful that the forefathers who drafted the constitution forsaw this.
 
Actually from the small know of people I know who went to some of the vigils in the US, they went as the opposite of a protest - they went to mourn and support their community, not to protest. So while you may consider vigils a form of protest, not everyone does. Some want to separate the protest from the mourning.

The one in New York City was pretty political and energetic before the vigil and remembrance part. So yes, some people just wanted to mourn, but other people wanted to fight and protest among a few things, but also advocate for stricter gun control, including people like Governor Cuomo and Mayor DiBlasio among many other speakers who have been fighting for stricter gun control nationwide for years if not decades.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information