I watched Shakespeare in love on dvd, mainly because I had seen it in theater and I remember feeling upset when it won the Best picture Oscar over Saving Private Ryan. I also remember thinking that the best actress should have gone to Cate Blanchett. After watching it in a more objective state of mind, I came to some conclusions.
I still like Saving Private Ryan more but there are many positives about Shakespeare in love.
It is creative. The love story and its relation to his plays is fiction but it was developed and presented very well.
It Created the 16th century atmosphere very well through sets, costumes and lighting.
Good screenplay- always a must.
Many different emotions in the movie - some humor, action, romance, sadness.
I liked the way the two Shakespeare plays were woven into the story, and Twelfth night wrapped it up.
I didn't know that women were not allowed to act on stage those days, so the heroine dressed as a man (many Shakespearean heroines did that). Women didnt have much free will. Viola, the main character, married for duty to her family and her queen, and not the man she loved (he was a married man anyway). The class system/societal pressure was very strong. She couldn't cross the barrier. At one point she says (paraphrasing) as Thomas Kent she loved him but when she is Viola, there was a river between them.
Gwyneth Paltrow was acting as a man (acting) and a woman (real) within the movie. She showed her mixed emotions very well. She probably deserved the Oscar. I have no memory of Cate Blanchett's movie (that may be the next one to watch). I think Gwyneth was very good as Viola who was torn between love and duty.
Judy Dench was great as the Queen but I still feel that supporting actress Oscar was a consolation prize for not getting the one she had deserved the previous year (Mrs. Brown). I still felt that the role didn't need a high level actress like Dench.
I had forgotten that there were many future Oscar winners in that movie - Ben Affleck, Geoffrey Rush, Colin Firth. I was disappointed to see Firth in such a minor role. The movie really had an all star cast, and they were all good in their roles.
Joseph Fiennes was good as the young and tormented Shakespeare,but I couldn't help thinking of his brother Ralph Fiennes who is better looking and a better actor, IMO. Anyway, he was too old to play that role.
I can see why it received 7 Oscars. The only one I still disagree with is the Best Picture, but now that gap (between SIL and SPV) is narrower than it was back then.
I still like Saving Private Ryan more but there are many positives about Shakespeare in love.
It is creative. The love story and its relation to his plays is fiction but it was developed and presented very well.
It Created the 16th century atmosphere very well through sets, costumes and lighting.
Good screenplay- always a must.
Many different emotions in the movie - some humor, action, romance, sadness.
I liked the way the two Shakespeare plays were woven into the story, and Twelfth night wrapped it up.
I didn't know that women were not allowed to act on stage those days, so the heroine dressed as a man (many Shakespearean heroines did that). Women didnt have much free will. Viola, the main character, married for duty to her family and her queen, and not the man she loved (he was a married man anyway). The class system/societal pressure was very strong. She couldn't cross the barrier. At one point she says (paraphrasing) as Thomas Kent she loved him but when she is Viola, there was a river between them.
Gwyneth Paltrow was acting as a man (acting) and a woman (real) within the movie. She showed her mixed emotions very well. She probably deserved the Oscar. I have no memory of Cate Blanchett's movie (that may be the next one to watch). I think Gwyneth was very good as Viola who was torn between love and duty.
Judy Dench was great as the Queen but I still feel that supporting actress Oscar was a consolation prize for not getting the one she had deserved the previous year (Mrs. Brown). I still felt that the role didn't need a high level actress like Dench.
I had forgotten that there were many future Oscar winners in that movie - Ben Affleck, Geoffrey Rush, Colin Firth. I was disappointed to see Firth in such a minor role. The movie really had an all star cast, and they were all good in their roles.
Joseph Fiennes was good as the young and tormented Shakespeare,but I couldn't help thinking of his brother Ralph Fiennes who is better looking and a better actor, IMO. Anyway, he was too old to play that role.
I can see why it received 7 Oscars. The only one I still disagree with is the Best Picture, but now that gap (between SIL and SPV) is narrower than it was back then.
Last edited: