Just call me Harry. (Everything Harry & Meghan)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That guy has a huge ax to grind. I don't believe him.
Oooookay... Except that he's provided copies of the emails and text conversations with Meghan and Harry authorizing him to speak to the Finding Freedom authors.

Are you saying you believe the emails and texts are falsified? That would be pretty easy to prove otherwise... And I can't see where the professional benefit to Knauf is in settling whatever old scores exist between him and the Sussexes in such a public manner.

A spokesman last year, for example, said they “did not collaborate with the authors on the book, nor were they interviewed for it.” However Knauf in his witness statement released today said that Meghan and Harry “authorised specific cooperation in writing in December 2018.”

Knauf added that he advised against putting the authors in touch with friends of the duchess, telling Harry “this was not a good idea” and that “being able to say hand on heart that we did not facilitate access will be important.”

However Meghan said in her response statement that when she suggested sending a blanket email to her friends asking them actively not to cooperate, Knauf had advised her to not do so.

Knauf emailed Harry that he would meet the authors to help with “factual accuracy and context.”

Harry replied saying: “I totally agree that we have to be able to say we didn’t have anything to do with it. Equally, you giving the right context and background to them would help get some truths out there. The truth is v much needed and would be appreciated, especially around the Markle/wedding stuff but at the same time we can’t put them directly in touch with her friends.”

Knauf then contacted Meghan, emailing her a list of questions from the authors.

Knauf wrote: “If you’re happy I will see them later this week to set out the factual background and to provide more recent context.”

Meghan replied that evening, saying: “Thank you very much for the info below - for when you sit down with them it may be helpful to have some background reminders so I’ve included them below just in case. I know you are better versed at this than most but assisting where I can. I appreciate your support—please let me know if you need me to fill in any other blanks.”

Knauf then listed “the briefing points she wanted me to share with the authors in my meeting.”

...

Knauf then received an email from Prince Harry that said: “Also, are u planning on giving them a rough idea of what she’s been through over the last 2yrs? Media onslaught, cyber bullying on a different scale, puppeteering Thomas Markle etc etc etc. Even if they choose not to use it, they should hear what it was like from someone who was in the thick of it. So if you aren’t planning on telling them, can I ?!”

Knauf said he replied saying “Of course—I’ve never stopped!”

Knauf said Harry replied: “Oh how I hope they report on it properly. Good luck!”
 
The emails don't show much other than the typical MO for authorized biographies which is that the participants aren't directly writing the book, but have authorized "friends" to speak to the author.

This is pretty ordinary. The queen and the other members of the BRF also have these "friends" who are authorized unofficially to speak to both the press and certain favored royal biographers.
 
Well when I'm wrong I'm wrong and I'll eat my words. Looks like Meghan did cooperate more fully with the book than previously known, since she apologized for it:

 
Well when I'm wrong I'm wrong and I'll eat my words. Looks like Meghan did cooperate more fully with the book than previously known, since she apologized for it:
I don't know. To me, cooperating would mean doing one or more of the following:
-sitting down for an interview with the authors (or their representatives)
-exchanging emails or phone calls or texts with the authors
-seeing parts of the book ahead of time and being able to make suggestions or corrections
-sending corroborating info (such as diaries, ticket stubs, receipts) to the authors while they are doing research for the book

I don't think telling your Comms guy that it's okay to talk to them and, if you do, here are some things I'd like you to say, but not knowing if he said them or not, is not exactly cooperating.
 
Meghan also said she was not aware of the emails between her and Knauf at the time of her previous statement because the litigation had not reached the disclosure stage, and her lawyers asked to adjourn the trial due to her pregnancy.

How can she be unaware of emails that she wrote? This isn't a passing detail that could have slipped anyone's mind. The media had been full of speculation ever since the book came out that she and Harry must have funneled information to the authors and she claimed in legal filings that she had absolutely nothing to do with it. I don't find it credible that she's only now remembered her discussions with her advisor.

Regardless of how any of us would define cooperating, Meghan has admitted she misled the court about how much of it she did.
 
I don't know. To me, cooperating would mean doing one or more of the following:
-sitting down for an interview with the authors (or their representatives)
-exchanging emails or phone calls or texts with the authors
-seeing parts of the book ahead of time and being able to make suggestions or corrections
-sending corroborating info (such as diaries, ticket stubs, receipts) to the authors while they are doing research for the book

I don't think telling your Comms guy that it's okay to talk to them and, if you do, here are some things I'd like you to say, but not knowing if he said them or not, is not exactly cooperating.

This was the part I found interesting:

"The former aide said Harry told him: "I totally agree that we have to be able to say we didn't have anything to do with it," in the email, PA reports. "Equally, you giving the right context and background to them would help get some truths out there."

Harry closer to the detail and discussion but the media want to just blame her. Also that quote pretty much makes it clear they wanted to help and provide details and context but thought that putting in the middle man of the coms person would make them able to deny that they were involved which is ridiculous, you either did or didn't help. If you didn't want anything to do with it then you don't give them anything. Giving them some information (even indirectly through your coms person) means you were involved.
 
Last edited:
Also interesting is that she wrote the letter to her father specifically with the thinking that it could well be leaked to the press and wording it with that in mind. She then complained when it was. :confused:
 
March 2018: marriage

Dec 2018 Hauf to Markle:
“They are going to time the book for run-up to the baby being born and it is going to be very positive. They are prioritising the US market and will position it as a celebration of you that corrects the record on a number of fronts. I will stay in close contact with them.”

May 2019: Archie's birth

March 2020: withdrawel from official Royal duties. The Sussexes leave UK.

So when did they decide to leave and move to the US?
 
Last edited:
Finally the truth comes out and I'm here for it. She has always been someone that strikes me as a social climber. The way she burns bridges and treats staff members and especially the Queen, she deserves everything thrown at her. I doubt there's even a Lilibet.
 
Finally the truth comes out and I'm here for it. She has always been someone that strikes me as a social climber. The way she burns bridges and treats staff members and especially the Queen, she deserves everything thrown at her. I doubt there's even a Lilibet.

Omg. Are you getting into the sekret baby conspiracy theories? I thought that was reserved for Tessa and Scott.
And in this day and age, how can people make up having a baby? This isn't Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf.
 
Do you think that the RF knew that they co-authored the book "Finding Freedom"?
Having done a research, it looks like, yes, because Jason Knauf was the communications secretary of the Sussexes AND the Cambridges at that time.

Jason Knauf who stopped working for the Sussexes (continuing to work for the Cambridges) turned against Harry and Meghan after the Oprah-interview. This makes me believe that this interview was REALLY shocking for the RF and became a game changer. Otherwise they were okay with the Sussexes leaving and didn't want to harm them.
 
Omg. Are you getting into the sekret baby conspiracy theories? I thought that was reserved for Tessa and Scott.
And in this day and age, how can people make up having a baby? This isn't Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf.
There's been no mention of her, not even a foot or a hand. Everytime someone asks Meg how's her new baby, she flakes out and moves on. She shows no interest. That's not how a mother behaves unless she's psychotic.
 
There's been no mention of her, not even a foot or a hand. Everytime someone asks Meg how's her new baby, she flakes out and moves on. She shows no interest. That's not how a mother behaves unless she's psychotic.
Maybe she just wants her to grow up without anyone calling her a chimp. Not everything has to be blasted on social media. But I get it, Meghans an uppity n---r and a man so Lilibet must be fake.
 
Maybe she just wants her to grow up without anyone calling her a chimp. Not everything has to be blasted on social media. But I get it, Meghans an uppity n---r and a man so Lilibet must be fake.
Wow, you didn't have to go there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information