MacMadame
Getting radicalized on YouTube
- Messages
- 65,824
Zoom. I get quite a few requests to attend public speaking engagements over zoom. None with Harry or Meghan though.Doesn't public speaking require a live audience? ?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zoom. I get quite a few requests to attend public speaking engagements over zoom. None with Harry or Meghan though.Doesn't public speaking require a live audience? ?

So Meghan never became a UK citizen?
There are lengthy residency requirements involved. Yes, Meghan was going through the process, but it takes a number of years to obtain UK citizenship, which also requires living there primarily for a period of time. That appears to be something which isn't going to happen at this point. No loss either, btw. Who would want to become citizen of a country that harbors in some quarters such rabid, racist attitudes and press coverage toward them! I'm not talking about the lovely down-to-earth people in Britain who kindly supported Meghan and Harry, and who enthusiastically came out to greet them during community visits and at their memorable wedding.
There are many people who are British citizens who live in the U.S. for lengthy periods of time on certain visas related to why they are here. Some of them eventually become U.S. citizens, including a number of actors. I don't think Harry would ever give up British citizenship, nor do I see him becoming a dual citizen, but we'll see what the future holds. When Archie turns 18, he may end up holding dual citizenship, or else he may decide to choose. That's also in the future.Zoom. I get quite a few requests to attend public speaking engagements over zoom.
How preposterous is such a worry if in fact Wills has always been on his best behavior and harmlessly benevolent toward his brother and sister-in-law. 
The sandbagging, pre-empting and gaslighting against the Sussexes is pretty blatant, and it's especially obvious to those royal observers who haven't been burying their heads in the sand regarding the current royal soap opera.
Methinks the book about the Sussexes is actually being used by the firm as fodder to continue pacifying the hungry media monsters, and as a shield to distract from the more serious Prince Andrew concerns. Has anyone noticed how ByLineInvestigates' serious revelations about KP-staff-related 'cash for Sussex leaks' uncovered via a whistleblower, have simply been ignored by mainstream media outlets. 

500K for a Zoom public speaking engagement, I don't think so. ?
Photos of Harry and Meghan volunteering at the Home Boy Industries in LA along with a nice
video piece from ET.
![]()
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Volunteer in LA AGAIN!
Meghan and Harry spent Wednesday afternoon with Homeboys and Homegirls of Homeboy Industries in Los Angeles, a community social justice organization working ...www.youtube.com




I think the book is doing them much more harm than good. From the parts serialised in the papers it just makes them sound even worse, didn’t think that was possible but it really does![]()

They have denied direct involvement, leaving open the question of what other kind of involvement they may have had. I have read that they declined interviews with the authors, so they must have known about the project. They don't seem to have asked their friends or acquaintances to follow their example.Harry/Meghan have expressly denied involvement in the book. Whether that is true is another question.
The book appears to make it more difficult for them not only to resume royal duties at the end of their year away from them, but also to get on with their intended alternative, running their own foundation. Who would contribute to a charity run by a couple of petty family castoffs?
Harry and Meghan are both thought of very highly by many countries, institutions, organizations, movers-and-shakers, regular people of all backgrounds, and most important of all, by people in positions of influence and power around the world. Seemingly, you are taking the ridiculous tabloid dross, the lies, and the unfounded, twisted tabloid narratives about M&H at face value.The book just seems to indicate that if Harry and Meghan had lived together for a while in the UK before getting engaged then a lot of the culture clash and different points of view could have been worked though before everything was locked in.
Meghan said that Harry proposed to her when she was cooking a chicken dinner in "their" kitchen.

There's this:Has anyone read the book? Could they summarize a few points so we don't have to?![]()
![]()
Finding Freedom: 10 things we learned from Harry and Meghan's book
Biography reveals extent of Buckingham palace’s hostility towards Duchess of Sussexwww.theguardian.com
This doesn't ring true to me. Even if Harry doesn't have direct access to the Queen (really?), his father surely does. And yet, the authors would lead us to believe that the Duke and Duchess didn't bother asking him for help.According to the book, it was known within the palace walls that Harry and Meghan wanted changes to their royal status and had sought discussions with the Queen prior to a six-week trip to Canada at the end of last year.
It says they made the final decision while in Canada and again sought a meeting with Harry’s grandmother, but were told she would not be available until the end of January 2020. The announcement, the authors claim, came on 8 January because the couple got wind that a story was due to break in the UK press.

If Harry's issues with his brother stem from William suggesting that he take his time getting to know Meghan, that strikes me as perfectly reasonable advice from one sibling to another - especially given that they both know what it means to marry into the BRF and have the example of their parents who did marry quickly (albeit at a younger age). That's the main reason that's been consistently reported, and it doesn't paint William as petty, image conscious or temperamental