I think Michelle is an impressive skater especially because of her consistency, smooth and fluid skating skills, beautiful spirals, and engaging expression, but there are a number of other skaters whose performances I would rather watch. In terms of Americans, I always thought Kristi Yamaguchi who is probably my favorite American skater was underrated by comparison and though her and Tara Lipinski retired early I never understood why Michelle Kwan was praised as so much better on forums other than she skated longer. But this is an important point. Michelle's most impressive quality is that she skated consistency well for a long time, though she often got generous scoring and made her content easier as her career went on.
Personally in terms of Americans who are mentioned far less often, I liked Kristi's musicality, grace, posture, expression and lines better though she wasn't as consistent and I don't connect with Michelle's artistry as much as the people who praised it so highly, though I respect everyone's right to have their own opinion, and her jumps were not impressive to me. except for the consistency. Also in a personal preference sense, I admit her comparison to two of my favorite skaters plays a role. I feel strongly that Lu Chen should have won Worlds in both 1995 and 1996, losing because of the artistic mark in 1996 especially when Michelle Kwan's artistry had not developed to its peak was a clear contradiction in my view considering that Lu Chen's FS performance is one of my favorites, and I think Mao should have won Worlds in 2007. So in my opinion, I think Mao and Michelle Kwan should both have won 4 World titles, instead of Michelle having 5 and Mao having 3. And relative number of World wins plays a role in being under or overrated in my view.