I’ve never once discussed the hotness of my male coworkers with any female coworkers. (Granted I work in a male heavy field and when I meet other women the talk often turn to how to succeed as a woman in a male oriented field).
when I was in university, maybe we discussed how cute or hot some of our male peers was, but not in terms of body parts or clothing? Most talk was in terms of dating.
(
the following has nothing to do with Cipres case, cultural differences, his good or bad motivations, if she asked for fotos or not... she was 13, that was illegal.).
... on other, more general issues raised in the process of this discussion:
The whole 1980's and 90's were about approval and in some cases encourangement women being bluntly sexual and talking dirty about men, as part of equality of sexes trend..
I was thinking of doing a collection from all seasons but all of these quotes are from seasons 5 and 6 and they were enough for one video. I might make anoth...
www.youtube.com
....and as Madonna said it "it is all about sex, and I will show people how to be sexually provocative".
Madonna discusses the Sex book
www.youtube.com
.... Madonna, who now claims to be the epitome of PC and women movement, and all other bs she is pushing, made a film where she is gang-raped and enjoys it... "A Certain Sacrifice".
Trailer zum Madonna-Film A CERTAIN SACRIFICE DVD hier erhältlich: http://www.amazon.de/dp/B016TFEKTG
www.youtube.com
... she and many other "entertainers" created "art" talking dirty, putting men in bondage, grabbing their organs, simulating sexual violence and advances..... there are many examples, i'll just give one Miley Cyrus.... who OH SO POPULAR with teen girls...
She even stuck a Jewish Star of David up her vagina....... But oh, gosh, nobody found that "offensive to the Jews".
There is an absolute and obvious double standard taking place! If any of these "activities on stage/screen" were performed or arranged by men, these men would be lynched!
Women, including me, fight
for equal rights with men,
not for more rights than men.
But what do we get now? what's ok for a woman, is not ok for man. Had a "slit-pic" been sent instead of "dick-pic" this may have been another story. Even using "slit" will anger people more than "dick" word, and yet they are the same.
I am personally against ANYbody, sending ANY unsolicited fotos of sexual organs, to ANYbody, unless "it is a group of people who willingly agreed in advance that being part of this group includes such exchange". I personally think that any form of "flashing" is an invasion of privacy, unless agreed in advance.
And yet we have another double standard: It is awful for a 13 year old to receive a foto of another's sexual organ (male or female) regardless of the age and gender of the sender. This girl and her parents are correct to be outraged.
... but, at the same time, there is another group of girls and parents, who do not want their girls to be exposed to "male penis" in dressing rooms and bathrooms of their school. But they are called "transgenderphobic" and told by one Judge that the girls' rights to privacy of their bodies and not being exposed to a male naked body/penis is superseded by "more important transgender rights".
“A female student (who is not a plaintiff but who had been sexually assaulted previously) was exposed to Student A’s penis.”
Do students have a right to privacy that includes not being seen in a partially clothed or unclothed state by members of the opposite sex? Courts are divided.
www.forbes.com