Bobrova and Soloviev out of Worlds

How does that address what I wrote? Obviously if you believe that using a substance is wrong, you'll feel bad about having taken it. And if you do something against the rules and know it represents an unfair advantage, that will be a problem. My question remains whether anything and everything performance enhancing should be considered wrong to begin with, regardless of whether it has adverse implications for health or not.

Willfully or not, you are being obtuse. I'm not sure there's any point in answering your question, but here goes.

One of the points Cindy Olavarri made in the passages I quoted is that competitive sport measures the athlete's performance. As soon as drugs are introduced that affect performance (in your example, because they assist in recovery from training), it is impossible to know where the athlete's performance ends and the drug's effect begins.
 
Willfully or not, you are being obtuse. I'm not sure there's any point in answering your question, but here goes.

One of the points Cindy Olavarri made in the passages I quoted is that competitive sport measures the athlete's performance. As soon as drugs are introduced that affect performance (in your example, because they assist in recovery from training), it is impossible to know where the athlete's performance ends and the drug's effect begins.
Not agreeing with you is not the same as being obtuse. I think that there are many interventions, some banned and some not, that impact athletic performance. And the line drawn regarding what is allowed and what isn't can be arbitrary.

There's no point in going around in circles about this, though. We obviously aren't going to agree on this.
 
What will never be banned is "chifir" (чифир) - high concentration of black tee (Ceylon or Indian). You take 5 bags of black tee, to 1/3 regular cup of hot water, an let it sit for 15 minutes. Let it chill, then gulp it. Cheap and free..... and 3 hours of uplift (then when it wears out, you feel it wearing out, but for 3 hours, for 1.50 USD, you get what no expensive drug or substance can give you)... :D

Wow! I am not sure I can handle such a high concentration of caffeine.
 
Not sure if anyone posted this yet but IN has an article up regarding this!

I found some of the comments at the bottom (from medical people, etc) to be a bit informative. One poster also confirmed that Sharapova from tennis tested positive too and that it is only produced in Eastern Europe and Russia.

http://web.icenetwork.com/news/2016/03/07/166490834

This was mentioned earlier in this thread, but I know you were away for sometime, so this must be new to you.
 
http://tass.ru/en/sport/861381
Restrictions imposed by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) on the Russian anti-doping body RUSADA late last year have affected RUSADA’s preventive work with national sports federations to exclude meldonium from use, RUSADA acting Head Anna Antselovich told TASS on Thursday.
RUSADA started to carry out active work from early October last year to warn about the imminent ban on the use of meldonium. However, the Russian anti-doping agency was compelled to stop this work from mid-November after receiving a WADA notice on the suspension of its activity, Antselovich said.
"The restrictions imposed by the World Anti-Doping Agency on RUSADA in November-December last year could not but have its negative effect on our preventive work with sports federations to warn them about the imminent ban on meldonium (mildronate)," Antselovich said.
ETA: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/...ire-russias-latest-doping-scandal/562029.html
Russian athletes and even doctors compare meldonium to Vitamin C. It was always on the same level as Levokarnitin, a vitamin, confirms Olesya Shevchenko, a former tennis journalist. Many Russian fitness websites contain recommendations on "How to take mildronate for sports." ...
It quickly became clear that Russian athletes would be hit hardest by the new regulation. German television journalist Hajo Seppelt, whose documentary films sparked the investigation into the Russian doping scandal, claims that one in five Russian athletes was using meldonium last year, while it was still permitted. Of 4,316 samples drawn from Russian athletes, traces of the drug were found in 724, or 17 percent — almost eight times the level internationally. Almost every athlete in Russia and Eastern Europe took it, agrees Shevchenko.
Elizaveta Tuktamysheva is quoted as saying: "Meldonium, mildronat I also saw earlier, but just know that it is considered to be doping, and immediately stopped taking it this year." She claims that she was unaware of the Jan. 1st ban and was informed by her skater friends about it. Google translated excerpt:
- Perhaps athletes really are to blame, not looking. But at the same time, I think about such important information should be notified - Tuktamysheva said.
 
Last edited:
Glad to see you have moved on from periods and are now saying that proper sleep and nutrition are now equivalent to taking medicine not prescribed for purpose. :lol:
I think you are mistaking me with someone. I haven't mentioned periods on this forum! But the proper sleep and nutrition do enhance performance!
 
I can't believe some people want to compare manufactured unnatural substances injected (or injested) into a human body to eating fruit and veggies and having someone give your back a rub.
Well, you have to look at the reason why they are banning the substance. Or they banning it because it enhances performance, or because it is not healthy for the athlete? If they are banning it because it enhances performance, you may have to look carefully what else can potentially enhance performance, because if you want to eliminate unfair advantage, you may have to deal with the fact that someone may have better access to proper nutrition or to better sleep.

On the other hand, if the ban is to protect the skaters' health, then you may as well ban all elite sports, because any sport at that level is not healthy!
 
I am wondering (not sure if this is the right thread for it)-

Is 3 months notice enough when a drug that has been in use for several years to be banned? I know virtually nothing about Meldonium, but how long does its effect last and what is the sensitivity of the measuring instruments? Taz'smum had posted some half life numbers. If I can find that post again, it will be good.

Hypothetically, suppose the instrument is able to measure concentrations from June 2015, while the notice to ban the drug came in Sept. 30th. If a skater immediately stopped using the drug, the trace amounts from June may show up. I don't think the instrument can tell when the drug was taken, or are there ways to tell?

What I am driving at is- should the skaters/athletes be given the notice earlier, like 6 months, 9 months, etc. depending on the drug? (I am just pulling numbers out of the air here). I am not trying to say whether they should be taking that drug at all or not, and I know there is a heated discussion about that in another thread. I am just trying to gather scientific facts. Chances are WADA has already looked into those. What if they didn't?
 
Last edited:
I am wondering (not sure if this is the right thread for it)-

Is 3 months notice enough when a drug that has been in use for several years to be banned? I know virtually nothing about Meldonium, but how long does its effect last and what is the sensitivity of the measuring instruments? Taz'smum had posted some half life numbers. If I can find that post again, it will be good.

Hypothetically, suppose the instrument is able to measure concentrations from June 2015, while the notice to ban the drug came in Sept. 30th. If a skater immediately stopped using the drug, the trace amounts from June may show up. I don't think the instrument can tell when the drug was taken, or are there ways to tell?

What I am driving at is- should the skaters/athletes be given the notice earlier, like 6 months, 9 months, etc. depending on the drug? (I am just pulling numbers out of the air here). I am trying to say whether they should be taking that drug at all or not, and I know there is a heated discussion about that in another thread. I am just trying to gather scientific facts. Chances are WADA has already looked into those.

You are right on the money. This is actually one of the things that is currently being investigated by the RF. According to an article I saw the other day, there are indications that if taken for a longer period of time, the traces stay in the body for a more prolonged period of time... If I find this source again, I will post it here.

Now this still shows some negligence in the part of the medical team since this factor has not been fully investigated at the initial talk of the bans... If proven, they could have made a good case with WADA.
 
@Vash01 This has been mentioned earlier in the thread. The half life of the drug is 6 hours. That means every 6 hours after you take it, another half of the dose is out of your body. So, 6 hours after you have 50% of the dose in you, 12 hours after you have 25% of the dose in you, 18 hours after you have 12.5% of the dose in you, 24 hours after you have 6.25% of the dose in you. After 48 hours, you only have roughly 0.391% of the dose left in you - a very negligible amount.

I would doubt the tests could detect it after two days. The tests they use for doping also measure concentration of the drug in the blood. Based on the half life, they can estimate how long ago someone took the drug. In this case, based on the concentration in the blood, she would have had to take the drug within a day of when the test was administered.

Because of this, I doubt that even if the drug lingers in the system for longer if you've taken it for long periods of time that it would linger in detectable amounts at a concentration high enough to indicate it was taken in the previous day for more than two months. Even if one person's body has a genetic anomaly that causes this to happen for their test, it's incredibly unlikely that it would happen for the tests of several different athletes, all from the same country.
 
Time for some levity in this revolving door discussion... especially as it seems to have disappeared down the Rabbit Hole quite some time ago.

TRITE HABIT
(To the tune "White Rabbit," with apologies to Jefferson Airplane)

One shot makes you stronger,
And one pill makes you haul,
And the ones that doctor gives you
Lift you up like an eight ball,
Go ask Katya
When she's ten feet tall.

And if you go forming habits
And then find out that you fail,
Tell 'em hookah-smoking Russian doctor
Slipped mickeys in your tail.
Go ask Katya
When she calls for bail.

She was Anna on the train tracks
And a champion in Moscow,
But injecting yourself with 'roid juice
To give yourself extra flow?
Go ask Katya,
I think she'll know.

Kicked off of the World team,
Disappointing your fed,
And the White Knight is talking backwards,
And the Red Queen's "Off with her head!"
Remember what the team doc said,
Take your meds!
Take your meds!

:p :p :p
 
Last edited:
Time for some levity in this revolving door discussion... especially as it seems to have disappeared down the Rabbit Hole quite some time ago.

TRITE HABIT
(To the tune "White Rabbit," with apologies to Jefferson Airplane)

One shot makes you stronger,
And one pill makes you haul,
And the ones that doctor gives you
Lift you up like an eight ball,
Go as Katya
When she's ten feet tall.

And if you go forming habits
And then find out that you fail,
Tell 'em hookah-smoking Russian doctor
Slipped mickeys in your tail.
Go ask Katya
When she calls for bail.

She was Anna on the train tracks
And a champion in Moscow,
But injecting yourself with 'roid juice
To give yourself extra flow?
Go ask Katya,
I think she'll know.

Kicked off of the World team,
Disappointing your fed,
And the White Knight is talking backwards,
And the Red Queen's "Off with her head!"
Remember what the team doc said,
Take your meds!
Take your meds!

:p :p :p
I probably don't have the right sense of humour, but I really don't find this funny. We are talking about someone's career going down the drain. Call me naive, but from the interviews with her, and based on her past actions, I honestly don't think she took it knowingly. So whichever way it got to her body, I find it quite sad situation. Yes, it is her body and therefore she is responsible, but I really don't see any reason for mocking her. But that's just my opinion.
 
@Vash01
Because of this, I doubt that even if the drug lingers in the system for longer if you've taken it for long periods of time that it would linger in detectable amounts at a concentration high enough to indicate it was taken in the previous day for more than two months. Even if one person's body has a genetic anomaly that causes this to happen for their test, it's incredibly unlikely that it would happen for the tests of several different athletes, all from the same country.

The athletes were not all from the same country or even the same part of the world. There is a list of them posted earlier in this thread.

As for doubting that the drug may linger in the system. I think "doubting" is not enough. This should be investigated.
 
Time for some levity in this revolving door discussion... especially as it seems to have disappeared down the Rabbit Hole quite some time ago.

TRITE HABIT
(To the tune "White Rabbit," with apologies to Jefferson Airplane)

One shot makes you stronger,
And one pill makes you haul,
And the ones that doctor gives you
Lift you up like an eight ball,
Go as Katya
When she's ten feet tall.
.........
:p :p :p

40,000 reps!!! The whole thing is brilliant :cheer2:
 
The athletes were not all from the same country or even the same part of the world. There is a list of them posted earlier in this thread.

As for doubting that the drug may linger in the system. I think "doubting" is not enough. This should be investigated.

It must be investigated. Careers of several athletes are at stake here.
 
I probably don't have the right sense of humour, but I really don't find this funny. We are talking about someone's career going down the drain. Call me naive, but from the interviews with her, and based on her past actions, I honestly don't think she took it knowingly. So whichever way it got to her body, I find it quite sad situation. Yes, it is her body and therefore she is responsible, but I really don't see any reason for mocking her. But that's just my opinion.

It's not "mocking" and it is not intended to be funny, the verses are in "murder-ballad" style.... yet it's rather "career-murder ballad"....:D It's called "creativity"...

like "Twa Sisters"..... http://www.darachweb.net/SongLyrics/TwaSisters.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_ballad

'
 
It's not "mocking" and it is not intended to be funny, the verses are in "murder-ballad" style.... yet it's rather "career-murder ballad"....:D It's called "creativity"...

like "Twa Sisters"..... http://www.darachweb.net/SongLyrics/TwaSisters.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_ballad

'

Depends on your interpretation. The poster said he/she was posting it to add levity- so the intent was to post what he/she considered funny. Katya Bobrova's name was used multiple times. I don't see anything funny about that.

Yes, there can be creativity that is mocking or even cruel. I won't condone that under the guise of creativity. I don't care for biting humor that's directed toward another person, particularly one that must be hurting right now.
 
... and based on her past actions, I honestly don't think she took it knowingly.

??? She freely admitted she used the drug in the past, those are her past actions. Now we are simply to take her word "I don't know how it got in my system." I'm sorry, hanca, as I truly appreciate your posts and POV, but I do think that is a bit naive. If you were a teacher and had a pupil who always failed to turn work in, would you believe "The dog ate my homework" excuse?

Vash, in real life, I am quite self-deprecating, but I am admittedly quite snarky as well. Quite a few posters have met me at comps and would probably attest to both of those things. This is far from the first song parody I've done on FSU, and I'm certain far more cruel things are being written about Bobrova across the web than this. Look how the Russian press butchered Plushenko when he withdrew in Sochi, and we've seen reports on here from Russian forums of conspiracy theories involving other coaches/dancers.... I see no moral outrage for those people.

Anyway, not everyone is going to agree on everything here. C'est la vie.
 
Why split hairs? Semantic drivel to appease the fans? These athletes, coaches and doctors abused a medicine by using it for purposes it was not intended, the definition of substance abuse. They used it to enhance cardiovascular training and performances in competitions. They did it in tennis, figure skating and speed skating. It has been ABused ubiquitously in Eastern European sports for a long time, only now becoming "banned" by WADA.

Legal, not legal, banned,not banned. They all ABUSED and CHEATED.

I'm done trying to explain it in any simpler terms, my opinion that is - they abused and cheated. No further discussion is necessary about cheating. We have to wait and see how the sporting world responds to the cheaters. That is a better topic for discussion.
 
??? She freely admitted she used the drug in the past, those are her past actions. Now we are simply to take her word "I don't know how it got in my system." I'm sorry, hanca, as I truly appreciate your posts and POV, but I do think that is a bit naive. If you were a teacher and had a pupil who always failed to turn work in, would you believe "The dog ate my homework" excuse?

Vash, in real life, I am quite self-deprecating, but I am admittedly quite snarky as well. Quite a few posters have met me at comps and would probably attest to both of those things. This is far from the first song parody I've done on FSU, and I'm certain far more cruel things are being written about Bobrova across the web than this. Look how the Russian press butchered Plushenko when he withdrew in Sochi, and we've seen reports on here from Russian forums of conspiracy theories involving other coaches/dancers.... I see no moral outrage for those people.

Anyway, not everyone is going to agree on everything here. C'est la vie.
She admitted that she used it when it was ALLOWED! So if they ban caffeine and some skater will admit that the year before he/she liked a huge mug of coffee before every competition to calm his/her nerves, will he/she become suddenly a drug cheat? I really don't understand what it has got to do what she did when it was allowed. Do you think people should be suing their parents for using corporal punishment some 20-30 years ago, when it was still considered the norm in the society? You have to take into consideration the timing, the circumstances. It seems to me that you are far too keen to judge someone, but maybe you should start thinking about whether you have ever done something that was 'allowed' (or not illegal) years ago, and now you wouldn't do it because it is not allowed. Do you think you should be judged for it retrospectively?
 
http://www.newsweek.com/russian-parliament-calls-emergency-doping-meeting-435114
Excerpts:
Mildronate, an approved drug with multiple indications besides its anti-ischemic properties, is known to have a positive effect on the endurance performance of athletes, improves rehabilitation after exercise, protect against stress and activates CNS functions.

http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/...s-sharapova-doping-case-doesnt-reflect-russia

Based on what the report says about meldonium protecting against stress and improving rehabilitation after exercise, why can't it be allowed for any athlete on an equal basis to support their recovery from athletic exertion? Especially if it is not habit-forming and doesn't cause adverse side-effects and does not have steroidal properties? I think there does get to be a fine-line between effective and unharmful therapeutic assistance for athletes and the gross misuse and/ or overuse of drugs for the exclusive purpose of enhancing performance for unfair advantage, as opposed to rehabilitative purposes.

The question in Bobrova's case is whether she was having problems with endurance and physical recovery from exertion as being the real reason behind her being given meldonium when it was not on the banned substance list. If it was prescribed for her purely to assist in physical rehabilitation and recovery (or for undeniable medical reasons), why didn't she and Russian fed advocate for full approval of meldonium and get ahead of the mounting suspensions regarding its widespread use that led to it being banned?*

Probably all athletes should be under the care of nutritionists, herbalists, physical therapists, highly skilled trainers, and massage therapists for the most effective enhancement of their physical health and well-being, with the goal of reducing as much as possible any necessity for pharmaceutical drug intervention in the first place.

ETA:
* Oh well, I see in the related GSD thread there is discussion of the fact that meldonium is known to have been used as a masking agent for illegal drugs. So apparently in probably the majority of cases the health-related uses excuses are suspect.


Not sure if anyone posted this yet but IN has an article up regarding this!

I found some of the comments at the bottom (from medical people, etc) to be a bit informative. One poster also confirmed that Sharapova from tennis tested positive too and that it is only produced in Eastern Europe and Russia.

http://web.icenetwork.com/news/2016/03/07/166490834

Yep, I was just reading this. The posted comment from Mr. van Wagenen is rather interesting/ provocative.

The stuff about Sharapova has already been out there and widely discussed in this and Other Sports thread.
 
Last edited:
The athletes were not all from the same country or even the same part of the world. There is a list of them posted earlier in this thread.

As for doubting that the drug may linger in the system. I think "doubting" is not enough. This should be investigated.
You are right, but it should have been investigated much earlier. Before those athletes were dragged through the mud and judged by people who have no any expertise in chemistry or medicine, but who have very strong opinions nevertheless.
It reminds me the joke- what is the difference between the witness, the expert, and the judge. The witness has seen everything but knows nothing about it. The expert knows everything about it but has seen nothing. And the judge is the one who has seen nothing, knows nothing about it but will make the decision.
 
She admitted that she used it when it was ALLOWED!

How is this different from her past actions, which is what I quoted in your previous post? (And she admitted taking the drug within the last year, not years ago, so I don't know why you are even trying to go there). The only time it was not allowed was for like three or four weeks between January 1 and the start of Europeans. I guess your reasoning is that those are the only time period of her past actions which count?

As for being keen to judge someone... well... it doesn't seem to be stopping you judging her or me, does it?
 
You are right, but it should have been investigated much earlier. Before those athletes were dragged through the mud and judged by people who have no any expertise in chemistry or medicine, but who have very strong opinions nevertheless.

On this, I completely agree.
 
How is this different from her past actions, which is what I quoted in your previous post? (And she admitted taking the drug within the last year, not years ago, so I don't know why you are even trying to go there). The only time it was not allowed was for like three or four weeks between January 1 and the start of Europeans. I guess your reasoning is that those are the only time period of her past actions which count?

As for being keen to judge someone... well... it doesn't seem to be stopping you judging her or me, does it?
By her past actions I mean that it feels to me (from several different things that are not even connected) that Bobrova is generally an honest lady with pretty high moral values. There was for example her giving out the car she received as a price for the Olympics to the charity. You may say that it doesn't prove anything, so she gave money, big deal, but how many skaters you know gave that amount of money, without being very well off? Yuna Kim spends a lot of money on charity, but Yuna is a very wealthy lady. Can you see let's say Lysacek giving his Olympic reward to charity? And I am not talking about making a donation, here and there some £100, but the value of that car, that was a lot of money and I don't think she comes from such super rich family that this amount of money would mean nothing to her. Secondly, at the time when there was the petition requesting the release of some skaters from the French federation, she put her name under it. There were some past competitive skaters who signed it, but not many current ones, because the current ones were worried about it having impact on their career. This girl has guts and signed it because she believed that it was the right thing to do. That says something about her values, and what sort of person she is.
There were also two of my personal encounters with Bobrova in the past (visiting Europeans and worlds). I am not going to go into details, but both encounters made me believe that she is a pretty decent person. I can't say that I love Bobrova/Soloviev's skating, I prefer I/Z and Z/G from the current Russian dancers, but if Bobrova says that she used to take something and stopped taking it well before the January, and that she really doesn't know how come that her result suddenly came back positive because she did not take anything knowingly, I believe her.

And your example about teacher believing the pupil who claims that their dog ate their homework - well, I may not believe nine out of ten pupils claiming that, but it is possible that I would believe one out of ten, if I have a reason to believe that. For example, if the pupil's past action give me no reason to disbelieve him/her. Because sometimes even the most ridiculously sounding excuse is actually true. That comes from a person whose homework was shredded by a budgie! Seriously!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information