Ah thanks all. A glorified skating fan Wendy Enzmann is NOT. Wrong choice of words. More likely I was projecting, and as I inferred previously that description is probably more accurate to me.
I was not making fun of volunteers. I do understand the necessary and important work of all volunteers, and of course I realize that judges are not paid.
Anyway as regards Enzmann, I am glad to be corrected, as I emphasized that I could be wrong. I did wonder whether or not Enzmann was a former skater, and I should have checked beforehand. So Enzmann has lived and breathed figure skating practically all of her life. Therefore, she probably has no problem at all with incessantly counting spin revolutions and explaining the WTF IJS judging system because she obviously truly loves the sport and she truly gives her all in trying to make it work as a judge and a behind-the-scenes official. And she clearly seems to love the work she does. No need at all for me to feel sad for her about what it takes to be an ISU judge. Kudos to Wendy Enzmann.
I agree as I mentioned in my earlier posts that Enzmann must have participated in the article/short video as a way to help fans understand some of what goes into the judging. It was certainly not a very detailed explanation or a complete workout of a "walk through the scoring system." But no fault of hers, and for what it was the feature might have been helpful to some fans. I do disagree with the picking on Adam, as I said. I think U.S. men are unfairly dismissed enough as it is. However, I never thought Enzmann had any overall dislike or problem with Adam on a personal or professional level. Still, I was disappointed by the over-attention on Adam's fall (clip from U.S. Nats?) on the quad lutz (which Enzmann referred to as a triple lutz), and the nitpicking about his lean in the air on his 3-axel. Adam truly deserves cheers for working hard at conquering his problems with this nemesis jump. I don't think the lean should take away too much from GOE as long as the landing is as secure as Adam has been achieving recently with such consistency. Even Javi and other athletes may lean in the air on some jumps and still land successfully. I realize that Javi's jumps tend to be more spectacular looking in the air and are generally straight most of the time with more assured technique. As I said previously, it could be that Enzmann also made complimentary remarks about Adam that were cut out, and we're left with the nitpicky ones.
I personally feel that the U.S. men do not get enough credit for how talented they are, largely because of the skewed emphasis on quads, which does not mean I hate quads. There are U.S. men who helped pioneer quads (Brian Boitano, Michael Chack, etc) and some who have made quad-related records (Brandon Mroz, Timothy Goebel, Nathan Chen) or who have notched personal quad-related victories (Evan Lysacek, Max Aaron, Richard Dornbush, Ross Miner, Grant Hochstein, Armin Mahbahnoozadeh, etc) in one way or another. Yet their achievements have tended to be diminished or simply go under the radar, especially now in the current environment of 300+ quad-related scoring victories.
I give Adam a lot of credit for his perseverance and courage in keeping with training the quad lutz and continuing to put it out there in big competitions. For me personally, I don't think that extra revolution is a savior of the sport. I think the quad's impact was not understood soon enough, and that how it should be scored, trained and looked at with a longer view just has never been given the kind of thoughtful, thorough and judicious attention it deserves. If you will forgive me, I must say that the kind of attention the quad gets is unfortunately rather glorified, over-hyped and OTT, with lack of deeper understanding. But I've opined before, and I realize when it comes to quads most fans and officials have made up their minds/ closed their minds.
No thanks to those stingy PCS scores, especially for Adam and Grant. 
Dare I .... 
Nevermind ... Gotta finish reading that Rolling Stone article posted by @Sylvia. So much to do, so little time. 
phrasing such as "wonky, beautiful sport/art hybrid," and incredibly inaccurate statements such as "... Hochstein – a flat-footed, melodramatic arm flailer who completed no quads at the national championships – stands no chance at breaking the top ten at the World Championships." Woah!!!
Grant is a very expressive, emotional and lyrical skater who has worked very hard to improve and to receive the wonderful, deserving opportunities that he has this season. His results have been notable, celebratory and very satisfying. Also, figure skating is art and sport, period. I think the judging system, the politics, and ISU regulating/ officiating/ lack of vision can be described as wonky, but the uniqueness of figure skating, not so much. In any case, figure skating is not an easy sport to participate in, and not an easy topic to write about, much less understand all aspects of, particularly the inherent political aspects which this article doesn't seem to take fully into account. There's more I could break down later re O'Neill's article. She also wrote an article on Max Aaron that was published in Rolling Stone, March 31, 2016:
, or 
, or 
. Can we at least agree that Worlds in Boston was a blast? 
