aftershocks
Banned Member
- Messages
- 17,317
I don't think many people question Charlotte's descent from Madragna, who may or may not have been dark skinned.
Yeah right. What's the fear, what's the aversion to someone being dark or tan or brown or velvety black, eh? Let's just try to get over it please. What you just said is like 100s of years into the future efforts being made to cover up Meghan's mother being brown-skinned with broad features, in the absence of irrefutable physical evidence. Meanwhile, there are enough historical writings, scientific knowledge and common sense available for us today to just get over this obsessive need to denigrate anything having to do with the fact that we are one human race made up of people of variant skin colors who have been intermixing since the beginning of time. Dark or brown skin was not a fearful or despised thing in ancient times.
There is no question of Queen Charlotte's descent from Madragana, so that's why there are ridiculous OTT efforts to deny Madragana's ethnic origins and her highly likely dark-skinned physicality. Dark can mean anywhere from very dark to dark-brown to brown to tan. And it's not just about skin color, but also hair texture and physical features, which can also be variant. To this day, in the same families with African heritage you can find fair-skinned, to olive-toned, to tan, to brown to dark brown, and darker-brown skinned individuals with a variety of hair textures and physical features. I know because this exists in my own family.
But this particular ancestor lives 500 years before Charlotte was born- and 15 generations back- making her African heritage only slightly above 1/10th of 1%. Probably most southern Europeans have more than that. And it is hardly enough to make Charlotte "mixed race"- any more than all of us are so to some degree.
If you actually read the last link in my earlier post, written by the man who conducted extensive research into Queen Charlotte's family origins, you will notice: "Six different lines can be traced from English Queen Charlotte back to Margarita de Castro y Sousa, in a gene pool which because of royal inbreeding was already minuscule, thus explaining the queen’s unmistakable African appearance."
That means there is not one line of descent, but six lines of descent from Queen Charlotte to Margarita de Castro y Sousa who is traced back to King Alfonso III and Madragana. It's all about slight variances in genetics, biology and DNA. For example, if Meghan's parents had conceived more children, some would likely have been darker than Meghan. Different skin colors and physical features are made out to be such a big deal when DNA technology has proven that skin color differences have no earth-shattering relevance to the makeup of human DNA.
Here's additional proof that dark and light-skinned genes are variant and not that big a deal:
https://nypost.com/2015/03/02/meet-the-bi-racial-twins-no-one-believes-are-sisters/ female twins
https://www.cnn.com/2015/03/03/living/feat-black-white-twins/index.html same as above
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/sep/24/twins-black-white male twins
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/28471626/...itish-couple-has-black-and-white-twins-twice/
two different sets of fraternal twins in the same family with different skin tones
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/04/race-twins-black-white-biggs/ additional fraternal female twins of different complexions from yet another British family