Can we talk a bit about gymnastics history? The 2001-2004 quad has always been close to my heart because it was when I started paying close attention to gymnastics, so I have to ask...wth were they thinking with that code? Like Cheng Fei's FX was out of a 9.9 SV with a tucked double/double, double piked full, triple twist, and 2 1/2 twist with front layout all because of those stupid dance leaps that nobody cared about? People got away with some truly bad form but because they fully rotated a double tuck jump they got like a 9.7+? How many cat leaps did we need to see? They were almost as bad as the dozens of Shushonovas we saw on FX during the 1997-2000 code. And why was a 9.75 like impossible to get and pretty much a 10.00 back then and a "solid" score was like a 9.4-9.5. Try as I might, I don't get the routine construction back then. Like how Carly Patterson's two E skills and two D skills and a 1 1/2 pirouette was out of a 10.00 SV but say Terin Humphrey who had like 3 E skills with combos and a D was like out of a 9.9 (or less?). Zhang Nan dismounted her bars with a double pike and I think her uneven bars SV was still high compared to others who dismounted with like a double layout full. Svetlana Khorkina's FX at 2003 Worlds looked messy as hell with bad and incomplete (and uncontrolled) landings on her dance skills and fake stuck landings (or controlled luges) but scores like a 9.65+ but at 2004 can only score like a 9.45+ with more controlled dance skills (I also don't really understand how she won FX silver at the 2000 Olympics where I felt other gymnasts had better tumbling and more dance but that's another topic).
Who came up with making gymnastics that robotic and boring? We still haven't recovered from that, and IMO, this code helped kill the 10.00.