Am I one of those "ubers at war" now? I don't see how thinking that Tessa was sexy in some of V/M's programs makes me an uber. Or how thinking that she can't do sexy automatically makes one a hater or an uber of another team, for that matter. Does it really have to be one way or the other, and nothing inbetween? That is, if you criticize a skater or team about something or are simply not 100 percent ecstatic about/convinced by everything they do, you must be their hater/an uber of their rivals, or, if you have a positive opinion about them, you must be their uber? Honestly, I have never understood that view. It's so foreign to me. I have been/am a fan of some skaters, but I have never considered myself to be an uber of anybody, as I can like someone or at least parts of what they do, but that does not mean I will like absolutely everything they do or that I can't like and defend their rivals. From what I have understood during my years on these forums, the general opinion about ubers is that they are incapable of things like that.proliferate like deadly bacteria, the earth would collide with the sun and humanity as we know it would cease to exist. At this point I am already weary of the uber wars and find myself skipping certain threads because reading them is akin to![]()
Also, I don't see how expressing one's opinion, even if it's more than once, can be considered a "war", as long as it's done politely and without offending other posters and skaters.