Med is much younger than Witt was in 1988. She started winning in her first season, and just finished her second season. At such a young age she is somewhat limited in what she can do artistically. Witt was weak technically, even by standards of those days. Zhenya is leading the field technically and that's why she is winning. IMO this comparison is unfair.
I wouldn’t compare their skating skills, strengths, and styles, at all, necessarily. They are unique, IMHO. For me, the comparison between the two, Evgenia and Katarina, is the mindset, the approach to competition. Katarina had nerves of steel, and I know, a lot of skaters did, and do. But, Katarina’s confidence? Well, that was different, somehow. Witt was, indeed, very confident, just ask Rosalynn Sumners and Debi Thomas about that. If you wanted to win, you had to go through Katarina first! Make no mistake! This wasn’t cockiness or arrogance (although, some of her ‘rivals’ might strongly disagree) but, instead,
complete confidence - a quiet, almost unassuming confidence, in her abilities to defeat her competitors and let them know it. Was Witt super-human? Of course not, as she did lose a World title, but she was tough to defeat, particularly at the Olympic Games.
Fast-forward to the present, where I see the same (competitive mindset) parallels in Evgenia. Now, If Med does not win the Olympic gold, then the Witt comparison is invalid, IMHO because you have to win the Olympic gold, and win it confidently to be compared to and categorized with Witt. Yuna came the closest in the confidence category, but Katarina’s confidence … was legendary. It is an honor, to be compared, even if just a little, to Katarina Witt. She was the complete package, a dominating skater in her discipline, during her time, and beyond.
The Olympic Games are the pressure cooker of all pressure cookers,
no matter what decade we are talking about. So, we’ll see.