syzygy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 173
Because all figure skating fans like to frustrate themselves over lutzes:
Honestly it's mind boggling how Alina and Evgenia are number one.
You're probably right. Do you know how we could get that moved? I haven't spent a significant amount of time on this forum specifically, so I'm not fully sure how that works around here. I already reported my post in case that would be any help.A trash can thread if I ever saw one.
Thank you so much. You all are very respectful to newcomers, thank youYou can ask it to be moved in Board Business. Or just "report" your first post and ask them to move it in your report.
Crazy, right! Her lutz was amazing.Where is Tonya?
I gasp every time I see Kostner's lutz. Looks almost like a robot (in a good way). It's so smooth and beautiful. Just unreal.The actual best 3Lzs are not even in the very top.
Skaters like Anastasia Tarakanova and Carolina Kostner have way better 3Lz with no outside edge while Zagitova uses her flat.
Where is Tonya?
That makes sense, but even with skaters who have only skated in the current IJS, it is still very surprising.The one thing that people continuously seem to forget is that the early versions of IJS (COP) were not the same as the current structure. Elements received a GOE that was essentially the average of all of the bullet points (ie. a -1 on one feature meant the average was likely to be 0)-- hence why most skaters received 0 or +1 as a max. Now, it's more of a pick-and-choose which features you want to add positive GOE to your score.
For this reason, these types of analyses are pointless.
Yes, I know that. My post was tongue-in-cheek.She never competed under IJS and the video specifically says that they took the data from the IJS protocols from 2004 up til now.
Absolutely.The one thing that people continuously seem to forget is that the early versions of IJS (COP) were not the same as the current structure. Elements received a GOE that was essentially the average of all of the bullet points (ie. a -1 on one feature meant the average was likely to be 0)-- hence why most skaters received 0 or +1 as a max. Now, it's more of a pick-and-choose which features you want to add positive GOE to your score.
For this reason, these types of analyses are pointless.
And a shame. The primary characteristic of the jump when it was invented was the long swoop.Yes but back in Scotvold's day skaters were still doing figures and the traditional lutz entrance was setting up a back outside edge close to one corner on the short side and then gliding on that outside edge to the other corner. Kwiatikowski was the queen of that entrance, but by today's standards it would be considered a long or telegraphed entrance.
A post referencing school figures,traditional lutzes,and Tonia Kwiatkowski?Yes but back in Scotvold's day skaters were still doing figures and the traditional lutz entrance was setting up a back outside edge close to one corner on the short side and then gliding on that outside edge to the other corner. Kwiatikowski was the queen of that entrance
Yes but back in Scotvold's day skaters were still doing figures and the traditional lutz entrance was setting up a back outside edge close to one corner on the short side and then gliding on that outside edge to the other corner.
Talking about the perfect entrance :
Dorothy Hamill in 2000
I really wish there was a minimum amount of time or distance that the edge had to be a visible outside. I'm okay with edge pulls as long as the outside edge is actually visible without having to obsessively watch for it. If synchro can judge distance and time, so can singles.I bet we wouldn't see so many 4ltzes today if skaters still have to do the lutz from the long back outside edge entrance. I kind of wish skaters have to go back to that again. It doesn't feel to me that skaters are doing true lutzes when they do the short, quick switch to a slight outside edge before toe-picking.