You are clearly reading the wrong romance novels then.
Well, I haven't read Ice Planet Barbarians yet, but I don't think that happens in those books either.You are clearly reading the wrong romance novels then.
Hey, I can be charitable. God knows, he's going to need all the money he can get his hands on when Meghan inevitably dumps his wholly unwell self.I am genuinely curious why someone who has criticised him writing this book would put money in his pocket by buying it?
Not a dig at all, just
I haven't read a book where frostbite occurs, but I did read one a while back in which the main characters were running across the Arctic and declined to have sex because frostbite was inevitable
.
I am curious as to how you know this since you haven't read the book.
Exactly because people in this thread are going by what has been sensationalized in the British press. Or fictional history like the crown (& admittedly so). Or false tabloid reports about his Military entrance grade claims etc
Source?
Of course, some people will never ever believe anything they say no matter what. And will tell us that us believing means there is something wrong with our critical thinking.
Some of us are going by a life-long love and interest in the royal family, especially the Queen. My daughter and friends planned way ahead and went to the Queen's jubilee. She was gobsmacked by the very public display of love for the Queen and the tremendous celebration held in her honour. She found it beyond amazing to see a country come together in that way. To us, her life and legacy are not just entertaining.
Well having grown up there I’m not a fan of the history or how the royal family made its wealth. I do have many family members who love them though, my Aunty Dot was even recognized for her services by the Queen.
Nonsense. Meghan has said that she is mad at her father because he staged stories with the tabloids, lied to her about it, and then didn't return her phone calls and texts. He didn't even tell her that he wasn't coming to the wedding and she was trying to find out if he was physically okay after hearing press reports that he wasn't coming to the wedding because of heart issues. Big difference IMO.
According to Morton’s book they also had their issues and tensions and falling out. They were not always on the same page over the years, how interesting life may have been in today’s times of social media especially for spare Margaret?
Well she would have been allowed to marry the love of her life for one thing. And of course if Charles had been allowed to marry Camilla...
Well, I thought we generally weren't supposed to discuss what we read/see on other forums, but there are a few people on a royalty forum I frequent who have already started reading their copies of the book and sharing some excerpts that haven't been sensationalized by the media yet.
Well that was actually admittedly historical “fiction” about who Margaret could marry, apparently her sister did support it? But who really knows?
That’s a little callous don’t you think? Having worked with kids who have lost parents in their formative years it is quite normal to idolize and fantasize about their deceased parent.
Are they sharing real events or they leaking lies to the press? There's a difference.
This is all from the words of Meghan and Harry. All Meghan's accusations I can return to them. About tabloids, and about lies, and about calls and texts.
You do realise you are in this thread basing your opinion of pretty much the same things. Just the other end of the spectrum. Right?
I guess if we are saying CNN is on the same level as British tabloids? My source for the military info was from CNN. But yes that is the point that I’m saying though that it’s all BS and gossip and tabloids. One could even say the only valid truth is from Harry as he is an actual real person and not a tabloid?
Oh that’s a low blow for CNN lol .. Fox maybe? Yeah I mean really it’s all crap but does make for entertaining fodder for the peasants.And of course no one ever told a story that put them in a better light
And I consider 24/7 news stations to be somewhat tabloid-y
. He is the product of those that raised him so why would you bother defending those that raised him? He is fallible, so are they but they have a much bigger system to protect them.
Actually, I'm intimately aware of how children can and do idolize and fantasize about deceased parents given that my ex-SIL's mother passed away when she was a toddler and her father was in and out of her life after that.That’s a little callous don’t you think? Having worked with kids who have lost parents in their formative years it is quite normal to idolize and fantasize about their deceased parent.
Well at least he is making his dime off you lol! Hope it’s entertaining
I don't know the truth of their claims anymore than I know whether the BRF snuck lies to the press. None of us do. But Harry and Meghan are certainly gaslighting, stereotyping, invading privacy, throwing people to the tabloid wolves - behavior they rightly say is unacceptable.
Hmm, well. My mother's father died when she was 13; she always said that her emotional development stopped at that point. I don't think that was true, as I think my mother was as fully adult as an adult can be, but she never felt that way. She always said it was like there was no foundation for her to develop adulthood on.
