barbarafan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,311
Thanks...quit a list. Petrenko's are a big plus. Galit Chait not so much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks...quit a list. Petrenko's are a big plus. Galit Chait not so much.
Okay, thanks for the correction/explanation.
It was not rewarded so well in the GOE, though (where such things are normally rewarded). Both Shibutanis and Hubbell/Donohue received a considerably higher GOE for their patterns.
Also, what you are saying is a bit of a surprise as on TV/video both Shibutanis and H/D's patterns look bigger than C/B's. I know that the impression on TV is often different than live, though.
Shibs are BY FAR the audience favorites. The crowd loves them in a way that it does not love Chock/Bates or Hubbell/Donohue. The audience really enjoyed C/B, and I got the sense that everyone knows H/D's history and sentimentally wants to see them get out of third place - but it LOOOOVES the Shibs. Shibs would have had to fall on their faces not to get a standing ovation - the audience WANTS to stand for them, whereas I think the other two teams need lights-out kind of performances to get the same reaction.well, Maia and Alex were the only team with standing ovation, so I think people in the arena were impressed with them.
Tanith says that the Shibs made changes to the FD, including music.
Novogorsk is one of the best training centers even in the world, in my opinion.It depends on how you look at it. There are certain advantages while they are training in Russia...I think they have a lot of ice access there. From things Kaitlyn and Andrew have said they stay in dorms and on their ISU bio they had 50hrs a week training. You can't knock that. I am sure there may be drawbacks as well but certainly they seem to be stronger and more resilient now.
But if it's not a "waste" and they actually deserve good scores ?I'm looking forward to seeing the Shibs' FD. They certainly nailed the SD.
I'm also curious to see how the team event pans out at the Olympics. It has crossed my mind that V&M could have more favour in the team event because subconsciously, the judges will see them as representing one of the Gold Medal contending teams. P&C will not be competing for a medal there, so why "waste" good scores on them? It will be fascinating to see how the psychology of it works. And if it has an impact on the individual competition... a win could give V&M back lost momentum.
But the Shibs could also mess with Canada's team chances by winning the SD outright. If I was Team USA, I'd put the Shibs in the SD where they can win, and either C&B or H&D for the FD to rest the Shibs. Whichever team skates is likely to finish 3rd anyway.
However : a country would actually want one team ahead of everyone, to make them the biggest contender. I'm guessing USFS would want Shibs to do both : "It's by far our strongest team, they'll medal". Otherwise it messes up with people's head. Now, we might get our answer tomorrow, because H/D have a huge vehicle for their FD and I'm hoping for anyone to be spot on because I really want to see the "judges" scoring.
2 men ? I don't know... Nathan has the potential against a Hanyu or a Shoma, but then...Given the makeup of the U.S. ladies Oly team (no clear stars/consistency), I am guessing they will use 2 ladies, and most likely 2 men, and only 1 dance team. Which sucks, given the depth of U.S. dance. But I suspect the Shibs, barring disaster tomorrow, will do both segments.
Given the makeup of the U.S. ladies Oly team (no clear stars/consistency), I am guessing they will use 2 ladies, and most likely 2 men, and only 1 dance team. Which sucks, given the depth of U.S. dance. But I suspect the Shibs, barring disaster tomorrow, will do both segments.
Bradie has been consistent this season, but B internationals and GPs, even Nats, are not the Olys. Her only major int'l so far was Jr Worlds last year and she didn't skate that well. Not sure USFS would risk putting her in such a high-pressure situation. I'm guessing Bradie does the SP and Mirai the FS.Bradie seems pretty consistent, but yes, the star factor is missing.
Novogorsk is one of the best training centers even in the world, in my opinion.
It’s a closed center for the best athletes, where they have access to whatever they may need there.
Russian rhythmic gimnasticks team lives and train there all the time (and Irina Viner, the head of the Federation and a wife of a well known Russian businessmen always chooses the best for her girls). When Ilinykh and Katsalapov moved to Morozov in 2011, Novogorsk became their main rink, where they trained during the season (and usually went to HJ during the off season). I guess that Morozov still has some connections there , so he uses that rink when he is in Moscow with his teams.
Yes, tomorrow we will know it but I think USFS would want send the message that US have two strong teams. I mean, everyone know that Shibs are bronze medal contenders, and they already showed it, so giving similar or major scores to H/D send the message that both are strong and bronze medal candidates. This does not degrade the Shibs, but favors H/D.
Olympics bronze medal will come down to TES.
Now that we know who's on the Olympic technical panel, I do think it could come down to PCS. Hilary Selby was technical controller at 2016 Worlds where it was raining level 4's for many of the top 10 teams, so it could potentially be the PCS mark making the difference at the Olympics.
I think the panel is going to be really be strict on TES, it's what's we've seen all season and last season. The teams are going to have to hit the key points of elements and timing.
US nationals final results :
1.Hubbell/Donohue 197.12
2.Shibutani/Shibutani 196.93
3.Chock/Bates 196.60
With Chock/Bates winning the FD....still so exciting about the three US teams being close to each other and it coming down to how they skate competition-by-competition.
H/D had a level 2 spin.Team event : Shibs for SD and H/D for FD I think. I don't really understand how C/B won the free though.
Oh I know. Still with that. I as watching some of the GOE, C/B I think got max on twizzles, almost +3 on step sequences. There is a difference in execution, and especially deepness of edges.H/D had a level 2 spin.
Their twizzles were lowkey boring..c/bOh I know. Still with that. I as watching some of the GOE, C/B I think got max on twizzles, almost +3 on step sequences. There is a difference in execution, and especially deepness of edges.
There is a lack of speed and it's very hesitant, this year more than ever. The commentators (all of them) keep pointing that out. I wonder if they feel the spectrum of Worlds 2017... because in intl competition, they don't even get 8 points, more like 7.80. Compared to H/D who often get 8.31 or 8.40 that's too much left on the table.Their twizzles were lowkey boring..c/b
It's a "better safe than sorry" type of twizzles. I can't blame them though, it did cost them so much in Helsinki. But if you want to get on an Olympic podium, you just can't play it that safe. OTOH, their FD is improving in smoothness. I may not like the musical editing (or the music altogether tbh) but they look more connected to it than to any previous FD since American in Paris. It also is less reliant on key acrobatics lifts which, while still being impressive, are much better integrated whithin the choreography.There is a lack of speed and it's very hesitant, this year more than ever. The commentators (all of them) keep pointing that out. I wonder if they feel the spectrum of Worlds 2017... because in intl competition, they don't even get 8 points, more like 7.80. Compared to H/D who often get 8.31 or 8.40 that's too much left on the table.