aliceanne
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,841
Toller marked T/D wayyyy down on Cecilia at World Pros in 1995, I think giving them a 9.6 when the rest were either 10s or maybe one 9.9. But then I think he tried to be a super drama queen and in his book said he gave them a 9.4. I wonder if he initially did try to give them the 9.4 and Button & co told him hell no, even if the score was clearly going to be dropped. He also was on the bandwagon at the very beginning saying Dean’s choreo for D/D was directly lifted from another (dance) performance. He just really saw no creativity in Chris
BTW- for those not familiar, it was not likely to get below a 9.6 or maybe a 9.5 in any of these pro competitions unless it was some unique format like the US Open. A 9.6 tended to signify that the program or the performance were pretty bad, but there was no point in going lower as scores were cumulative. Cranston was obviously making a huge statement with that in mind.
Weren’t Klimova/Ponnemarenko the reigning OGMs at the time? I think Toller resented that Chris Dean wasn’t taking his place in the pecking order. Cecilia wasn’t one of their most remarkable programs.
The best part of World Pros was often what happened off the ice. There was no “I’m just here to have fun and skate my best” at that event, the diva tude was on full display.