Ivana Hong. I really liked her transitioning into a coaching role but when athletes at Stanford started speaking up about abusive training conditions and the coaching culture in general last season, not only did Kristen Smyth come up, but Ivana did as well, with pretty much every athlete saying she was a “mini Kristen” and so she faced an investigation for her behavior just like Kristen did. But instead of going through it, because she knew it would result in her dismissal, she just quietly left the program and no one was the wiser. So to go from being ousted at a collegiate program because of how she treated athletes to the number one choice for the athlete’s council for elite WAG is kind of jarring. I’ll give USAG the benefit of the doubt and assume they didn’t know because not many people did and she’s obviously trying to keep it quiet, but also…yikes. She’s expected to be a person that athletes can turn to and the person who speaks for the athletes, but if she had grown ass women fearing her at Stanford I don’t see how girls as young as 12 and 13 will feel comfortable going to her. Hopefully she has changed her ways and will be a person people can trust, and since she won’t be in a position of power necessarily, it’s different than actually coaching…but yeah, of pretty much any former elite who has retired within the past couple of quads, she is probably the worst choice based on her history at Stanford.