Spun Silver
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,130
Thanks for that! Of course I meant negative.Guys, I'm pretty sure @Spun Silver meant negative.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for that! Of course I meant negative.Guys, I'm pretty sure @Spun Silver meant negative.
Thank you, Vash! I did type the wrong word. Can't even blame it on autocorrect.You may be right. I was confused by her post. Spun silver is not the type who would wish that on anyone.
I dunno if anyone is pretending. We are just living a normal life. We are based in Tampa. Tall buildings, yoga studios, a medical school, and lots of people with advanced degrees. Florida is a big state. South Florida is completely different from say Orlando or Sarasota. There are a lot of rural areas in Florida as well. I can only speak for where we are at. It has been business as usual since June 2020. At the end of a day, people are responsible for their personal choices. Those who do not wish to get vaccinated, do it at their own risk.It's very lucky that everyone you know has had a mild or asymptomatic case given that the rate of C0V1D deaths since omicron took hold has been even higher than that of Delta. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health...e-in-u-s-daily-death-count-than-delta-variant that hasn't been a lot of people's experience. Florida's vaccination rate is only 65% so I'm surprised people there are pretending everything is fine tbh.
I feel like the media likes to play things to about certain states.I dunno if anyone is pretending. We are just living a normal life. We are based in Tampa. Tall buildings, yoga studios, a medical school, and lots of people with advanced degrees. Florida is a big state. South Florida is completely different from say Orlando or Sarasota. There are a lot of rural areas in Florida as well. I can only speak for where we are at. It has been business as usual since June 2020. At the end of a day, people are responsible for their personal choices. Those who do not wish to get vaccinated, do it at their own risk.
I am not so sure of that. I think China will do what is best for China.
Don’t pretend that westerners are models of virtues.
If they wore or claimed to have worn N95 in the duration, they would not be considered as c;ose contact for isolation.No - this is from the playbook (thanks @Gris)
So, theoretically, it would depend on who was seated near him on the plane and how much physical contact he has had with any skaters or the amount of time he's spent in close proximity to any of them. It's impossible for any of us to know, but I'd guess that everyone on Team Eteri is potentially compromised.
Kogan less so, since he isn't in close day-to-day contact with any of these skaters.
Right, but they also are potentially going to have contracted it regardless of what they were or weren't wearing.If they wore or claimed to have worn N95 in the duration, they would not be considered as c;ose contact for isolation.
Most people I know who claim a false positive do so because they had a subsequent test that was negative. Sometimes the negative test is an aberration but sometimes they continue to test negative so that one test was clearly a false positive.They can claim false positive all they want but they still have to test once they are off the plane in China. What’s their plan for that?
Russian skaters have been paranoid about taking anything since the whole doping scandal began.Who says the athletes even know. Team doctor could be giving it daily with a handful of vitamins. To make them stronger and help them jump higher.
The possibility that a false positive test was actually a false positive test is much too undramatic for this thread ?Most people I know who claim a false positive do so because they had a subsequent test that was negative. Sometimes the negative test is an aberration but sometimes they continue to test negative so that one test was clearly a false positive.
I think one false positive is completely plausible but two? That would be really really unlikely.The possibility that a false positive test was actually a false positive test is much too undramatic for this thread ?
I think one false positive is completely plausible but two? That would be really really unlikely.
I think @wickedwitch meant both those guys getting false positive tests, which would be a pretty big coincidence.One of my pupils used to have 2-3 false positive tests within one week, so it's actually possible.
Out of roughly 50 skaters who are on the national team and have to test frequently, and roughly 50 coaches, judges and other officials, it doesn’t seem to me that unlikely that random two would have false positive.I think @wickedwitch meant both those guys getting false positive tests, which would be a pretty big coincidence.
more likely a false negativeI think one false positive is completely plausible but two? That would be really really unlikely.
Depends what test they have done. The tests you do yourself at home when you have no symptoms are not completely accurate. If it shows that you have it, you attend the testing centre and have yourself tested properly and it may show that you don’t have it. That means that the previous result was a false positive.there is no such thing as a false positive !!
what a joke ,you have it and it shows up on the test or not
We have different kinds of tests at school. I have also had a false positive Genrui test once. Did a second one with a Lyher test-set and that was negative.there is no such thing as a false positive !!
what a joke ,you have it and it shows up on the test or not
no. the rapid tests do have some false positives in them. We use them here extensively for school and work (people who are not vaccinated need to do a test) - false positives can happen of course. For instance, if you drink coke before taking a spit test, it can change the result.there is no such thing as a false positive !!
what a joke ,you have it and it shows up on the test or not
no. the rapid tests do have some false positives in them. We use them here extensively for school and work (people who are not vaccinated need to do a test) - false positives can happen of course. For instance, if you drink coke before taking a spit test, it can change the result.
We are talking pcr ( russia )no. the rapid tests do have some false positives in them. We use them here extensively for school and work (people who are not vaccinated need to do a test) - false positives can happen of course. For instance, if you drink coke before taking a spit test, it can change the result.
If the tests were pcr tests in the same run and one of the other reagents was accidentally contaminated with the positive control, you can have more than one false positive. It is rare because at diagnostics level testing, you have experienced lab techs and often automatic liquid handling systems, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility. It’s why you put a negative control (sample DNA or cDNA that is not from what you are trying to detect) and no template control (the ultra pure molecular bio grade water used to set up your pcr master mix instead of DNA/cDNA) to catch if anything like that has happened.I think one false positive is completely plausible but two? That would be really really unlikely.
Thank you for this. I learned something new.If the tests were pcr tests in the same run and one of the other reagents was accidentally contaminated with the positive control, you can have more than one false positive. It is rare because at diagnostics level testing, you have experienced lab techs and often automatic liquid handling systems, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility. It’s why you put a negative control (sample DNA or cDNA that is not from what you are trying to detect) and no template control (the ultra pure molecular bio grade water used to set up your pcr master mix instead of DNA/cDNA) to catch if anything like that has happened.
The odds of this happening are...so slim though. And yeah, you're going to run controls so that you'd never report these results anyway. But also you wouldn't just get one or two tests positive if there was contamination. I mean the whole set would show up positive, which should raise your eyebrows for mistakes right there.If the tests were pcr tests in the same run and one of the other reagents was accidentally contaminated with the positive control, you can have more than one false positive. It is rare because at diagnostics level testing, you have experienced lab techs and often automatic liquid handling systems, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility. It’s why you put a negative control (sample DNA or cDNA that is not from what you are trying to detect) and no template control (the ultra pure molecular bio grade water used to set up your pcr master mix instead of DNA/cDNA) to catch if anything like that has happened.
You’re welcome.Thank you for this. I learned something new.
for non athletes they might make wiggle room of automatic mandatory quarantine of 10 days and another PCR testWhatever the Russians say or believe, the Chinese Olympic Playbook instructions are clear: if one has had a positive PCR test--any one test in the required predeparture testing sequence--do not travel to China. Whether the Russians go 'by the book' or invent their own rules for themselves, and what the Chinese intend to do...we shall see.
Comments above about rapid antigen testing are IRRELEVANT as the Chinese only accept PCR testing (by a legitimate lab) as part of the pre-departure process.
Doubt it based on the reports that have surfaced about journalists needing to quarantine if they test positive on arrival. I don't think that China is going to be lenient in any way.for non athletes they might make wiggle room of automatic mandatory quarantine of 10 days and another PCR test