I agree. Thank you.But, we have no idea if the Snapchat posts are relevant to SafeSport's decision. It could have been made on other evidence. They could have verified them if they were relevant. None of which takes away from the fact they were offensive. SafeSport used whatever evidence was relevant to making their decision and they do not make that public in order to protect the aggrieved party. The public has to assume they did due diligence in making their decision. But, again, Miner made offensive posts on social media. Somebody did a screen shot of the posts and there you have it. Two separate events that may or may not be related and it doesn't matter. The posts are what they are. SafeSport suspended him for sexual harassment. There you have it.