Cupid
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,588
In the paper today, a headline said, "One in four of our children face hunger..." Is that correct? I thought it should have said "faces" hunger, not "face."
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's time to go back to sentence diagramming. The subject of the sentence is one; it is modified by the prepositional phrase in four. That phrase is modified by the prepositional phrase of our children. The subject of the sentence, one, is singular and takes the singular form of the verb, to face, which is faces; that's all there is to it.
We don't treat collective nouns in the manner you say (unless it's in error). We do not say 'The herd are ...' we say 'The herd is ...' because there is only one herd. We would say 'faces' referring to the op's question.I agree with "faces" here, but I'm an American. I wonder whether the British might use "face", treating "one in four" like they do collective nouns: "The herd are eating grass on the side of the hill."
Oxford Dictionaries say otherwise.We don't treat collective nouns in the manner you say (unless it's in error). We do not say 'The herd are ...' we say 'The herd is ...' because there is only one herd. We would say 'faces' referring to the op's question.
This site agrees with you and Vash.
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/one.htm
The way that none/zero can be either singular or plural and the rules and exceptions for "less" vs. "fewer" can be confusing too, but I know that sometimes one way just sounds right to me and the other way really bothers me.
The one that grinds my gears even more are phrases like "I would have went" or "He should have did."![]()
EVERY TIME somebody on t.v. says less - I yell "FEWER". What t.v. network used to say "less commercials"? Made me want to scream!!!
Here's a simple way to explain it to someone without the "technical" singular/plural grammar lesson - less thing, fewer things.
Sigh of pleasure when I saw this thread! I'm glad some still care about grammar. I yell at my TV and radio a lot!
Sigh of pleasure when I saw this thread! I'm glad some still care about grammar. I yell at my TV and radio a lot!
But it is likely only by position of the plural "children" in the sentence that "face" would seem to be correct. Of course while "one" is the singular subject of the sentence, in reality that "one in four" represents quite a large number of children. I usually save my grammar outrage for such things as "my sister and myself" or "between you and I."I favor "face" because "children" is plural, but it's a hella awkward headline - our children? "Hunger affects one in four children" would avoid it.
We're really doing good in this thread.
You're killing me!![]()
Oh, congradulations. Posters to this thread have had there blood pressure increased by 10 points at least.
It's good that the original poster wishes to keep up on correct grammar, but don't bother looking to the newspaper for correctness! I don't think I've gone through a day without finding an error in the paper. And I don't even read all the articles.
Related - I just finished reading a book where she used suppose instead of supposed 8 times that I counted. I was suppose to....... DROVE ME CRAZY. There were other typos in the book, so I guess it's the editor's fault? Although, editors don't actually edit, do they? Does anybody but the thanked family members ever read these books - like maybe for typos, grammatical errors, spelling? (off topic rant off!)
Should of probably derives from the same sort of mishearing that has given us "doggy dog" (should've = should of).One that drives me nuts is "Should of..." instead of "Should have..."