[Heavily edited from original because of
@skatingguy posting one of the ISU rules regarding quad reps].
4S+1Eu+4S would be worth 19.9 base points, and potentially could score up to 24.75. As he performed it there, I would expect at least +4's. Just perfect technique all the way around and look how prepared he was for the landing of the first 4S.
Scenario 1: Skater A:
4S+Eu+4S
4T
3A+3T
3A
3Lz
3F
3S+3Lo
And that would be within the rules. Total base value for jumps: 70.0
Scenario 2: Skater A with same jumps distributed differently:
4S
4S+3T
4T
3A+Eu+3S
3A
3Lz
3F+3Lo
Still a 70.0, and more 'conservative', even with 3 quads.
The fact that it's equal is a problem for me.
Scenario C: Skater B quad Lutz, but still only doing one quad in combo while Skater A (part 2) did two quad combos:
4Lz
4S
4T
4T+3T
3A
3A+Eu+3S
3Lz+3Lo
Total jumps base value: 76.0.
Problem for me is that the Skater A has the much harder combination in Scenario 1, but Skater A can only have three quad attempts as they only have a 4T and 4S. Skater B does 3 different types of quads, and is able to have 4 quad attempts plus the two 3A.
I think there needs to be a bonus for jumps done on the end of combinations (there has been discussion about this forever) or there needs to be a limit of 2 quads repeated and 2 triples repeated rather than 2 combined. Of course mistakes will make skaters have to scramble in their heads, but why even go for this Skater A program with that crazy sequence? Gives zero incentive.
Could you imagine 4Lz, 4S+3T, 4S, 4T+3T, 4T, 3A+Eu+3S, 3A, 3Lz?