beckab81
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,081
I wish Jimmy had been able to bottle that success from 4CC's and carry it forward. With USFS only using current season WS in their criteria, it's really leaving him on the outside looking in
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's nothing in the Announcement that says that if a host gives back a spot(s), and a competitor from any member withdraws, that if their skater/team is at the top of the Alternates list, they can't assign that skater/team to their GP. I suppose, in theory, that if their skater/team is second on the list, they could try to cut a deal behind the scenes with the member whose skater is at the top of the list and have them pass on the assignment, but that would be a real outlier case. The member, not the host, has to pay for part or all expenses, depending on how long in advance the skater/team is offered the spot, which might be an incentive for some Feds.Or it means that there is a third spot they were being sneaky about. Is that even a possibility? Do we know for sure that it was horse-traded away or was that just an assumption?
Even if that would be possible why would they give the spot to jacob only 1 day after Max won a competition ahead of him?That actually makes me wonder whether he's heading to Skate America instead, but that would mean that Brown or Kapeikis is dropping out. Or it means that there is a third spot they were being sneaky about. Is that even a possibility? Do we know for sure that it was horse-traded away or was that just an assumption?
Well quads don't seem to matter since Jason doesn't have one either. But I agree Jacob is so young. He should focus on france 2030. That gives him enough time to learnTBH I don't want Jacob on this team.
I want him to pace himself to have a great next quad. That includes learning quads.
so they are sending Max & Liam to Tallinn and Max & Torgy to Zagreb with Jacob as sub for Zagreb. My guess they are not only counting the scores in their rulebook but want to compare as much as possible. This is gonna be exciting
Naumov initially planned to stay for two weeks but ultimately ended up extending his stay to six weeks and crafting both his short and free programs for the Olympic season.
“Our plans were changing on the fly and Benoît was so incredibly willing and helpful to me because he provided all the resources that I needed and he said, ‘You can stay as long as you want’,” Naumov said. “And we ended up doing that.”
While Naumov usually has a concept in mind when he begins the choreography process, he arrived in Courmayeur without any ideas for which direction to take.
“This year, I really was starting from scratch,” he said. “In the past, we would sit down and have a meeting and think about it, throw strategies out there, and we didn't obviously have that this year. And I kind of just wanted to be open, open to any possibilities.
“I came to Benoît and I said, ‘Hey, I'm not really sure what I want to do this year. I want do something great. I want to do something different and new and fresh and clean, but I don't really know where to start’, and we just got to work immediately.”
Richaud took out his phone and started playing tracks from a playlist. The answer came almost instantly. As the second option sounded over the rink’s loudspeakers – Frederic Chopin’s "Nocturne No. 20" – Naumov had his short program music picked out.
“Immediately, there's a feeling that you know that this is the one,” Naumov said. “Especially because there's no lyrics, it's that much more meaningful. It's a classic piece, and I connected with it right away.”
I’ll sign on to the recommendation of Torgashev bringing back both of last year’s programs.
Well quads don't seem to matter since Jason doesn't have one either. But I agree Jacob is so young. He should focus on france 2030. That gives him enough time to learn
All I said is that Jason doesn't have a quad and he doesn't or am I wrong?Jason doesn't have a quad, but when he is on, all of his jumps are crisp and clean and no matter what his skating skills, edge quality, emotional performance, etc., deserves way more marks than the judges can even give versus others skaters
All I said is that Jason doesn't have a quad and he doesn't or am I wrong?![]()
Does the IceChallenge help much with data points? I didn't see it on the list of Challenger events.I don't think it's really much more than giving all of the men 4-5 competitions over the course of the fall.
Ilia - Lombardia, GPdF, SCI, GPF
Jason - Denis Ten Mem, Trialeti, SkAm, Finlandia
Tomoki - Cranberry, Kinoshita, Trialeti, CoC, SCI
Andrew - Nebelhorn, GPdF, NHK, Golden Spin
Liam - Cranberry, Nebelhorn, SkAm, Tallinn
Jimmy - Cranberry, Kinoshita, NHK, Finlandia
Max - Lombardia, GPdF, IceChallenge, Tallinn, Golden Spin
Jacob - Cranberry, Nepela, CoC, IceChallenge
Max and Tomoki are the only guys who will wind up with 5 comps, the rest will have had 4 (unless Jason qualifies for the GPF). Seems like the USFS is basically just giving all of them the chance to fill as many data points or improve the lower scores if they have more than 2 Challengers/Sr Bs.
Jacob is a promising skater but he is no Jason Brown. He will absolutely need a quad or ideally 2+ to be competitive internationally
IceChallenge counts in the same category as Challengers/Senior Bs. The raw scores themselves do not count - the highest CS/Sr B score as well as the average of the two highest CS/Sr B scores are multiplied by either 75 or 80%, IIRC (I'm at work so I'm going off memory of the formula). In that regard, yes, Max's IceChallenge score counts, but it's offset by the fact that he only had one GP assignment, so the 2nd GP field is calculated to be 80% of the 1st GP's score - and that depresses the GP score average to 90% of whatever was earned at the 1st GP.Does the IceChallenge help much with data points? I didn't see it on the list of Challenger events.
In the short term, yes. But he's still young, let's give him a little time before writing him off. If he doesn't happen to get his quads, he could always take his refinement to the next level. I think it's a good idea for all skaters to try to get to Jason's level of refinement for a long career, because quads are pretty rough and hard to maintain.
Thanks, it is complicated! We will see how Max does, but I agree with some of you that the judging at IceChallenge seemed more lenient than at the other events.IceChallenge counts in the same category as Challengers/Senior Bs. The raw scores themselves do not count - the highest CS/Sr B score as well as the average of the two highest CS/Sr B scores are multiplied by either 75 or 80%, IIRC (I'm at work so I'm going off memory of the formula). In that regard, yes, Max's IceChallenge score counts, but it's offset by the fact that he only had one GP assignment, so the 2nd GP field is calculated to be 80% of the 1st GP's score - and that depresses the GP score average to 90% of whatever was earned at the 1st GP.
What will really help is if he can replicate the IceChallenge score at Tallinn Trophy and/or Golden Spin - or at least score in the mid-230s. He needs to demonstrate consistency in his scores and the USFS is also going to consider whether or not his scores have been improving over the course of the season. Right now, IceChallenge looks to be more of an anomaly than a demonstrable improvement in his general scoring range, which has hovered in the mid-220s at best for this season and last season.