First of all, show me where I said that if someone dopes enough they are guaranteed a medal.
Secondly, in the running world years went by with whisper campaigns around who was doping, with the defenders always saying "so and so has been competing for 10 years and never tested positive" until one day they do, and then it comes out they've just evaded detection for years. If there's enough incentive to dope, unscrupulous doctors and training environments test and discover new drug cocktails and dosing plans that evade current testing protocols.
Going back to my second point- it's possible that doping hasn't been widespread in figure skating until now because the shadowy support system for cheaters isn't in place in general in this sport. There aren't athlete agents and promoters getting a cut, in most countries skaters can barely afford ice time and coaching fees, and they certainly aren't getting huge Nike contracts and their support teams aren't getting big $$$ when their athletes do well. There also probably hasn't been much experimenting around which drugs are best for optimal performance for young skaters until recently in countries that have a history of organized doping (like the one we are discussing).
With the rise of Eteri and the huge interest and $ to be made in addition to the sport's importance in propaganda I wouldn't be surprised if there was recently a lot more focus on developing the perfect performance enhancers whereas before that focus went into other sports instead.
I'm not sure I quite understood the answer to my question. Let's see if I get it.
So, the reason why we had 6 cases of doping in figure skating Vs hundreds in other sports, is not because the effect of doping in figure skating is minimal, but because ...there was less $$$ incentive to win than in other sports?
...I mean...
You said you trained with elite athletes. Did you get the impression they try to win the Olympics for money from the endorsements?
And are you sure there's less money in figure skating than in rowing, fencing or weightlifting, that had 1,000s cases of doping?
Tonya Harding - did you hear this name maybe? Do you think that's an example of an athlete who wouldn't do anything to get to the Olympics, including, let's say, taking doping if it had a real chance of improving her chances of a medal? At least being caught on doping wouldn't get you to jail, unlike being caught on an actual criminal offence.
Now, to answer
@airgelaal, and I absolutely agree with
@PRlady : if doping doesn't really give the edge for the gold, it doesn't mean some skaters who are pushed to extremes (not to mention their coaches, who have an endless supply of skaters) wouldn't take it, or for that matter do anything, including virgin sacrifice at a graveyard at midnight. That's not the point. The point is, in figure skating the benefits of doping are just too small to take this risk, and therefore a)probably it didn't really affect Valieva's results and b)probably that's why we have a single digit number of doping cases in history of the sport.
So yeah, we can claim that for some magical reasons figure skaters are just much better in camouflaging, or just didn't care much for the results.
Or we can say that doping doesn't have the magical effect in figure skating some people seem to give it, and its possible effect on the competition results (I'm not talking about breaking the rules! I'm talking strictly about the actual performance) is just not that great so it's not worth the risk.
And
maybe the reason why it feels like the effects of doping on the actual performance are blown out of any proportion, because that's how people cope with the fact that Tutberidze girls have been just unbeatable for a decade. And since her methods require unachievable (for any federation other than Russian) resources, unachievable pool of skaters and impossible training methods that would have been borderline illegal in the West, we'll just put it all on the doping and close the case.