SkateGuard
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,208
This reminds of Judge Judy
Judge Judy would've been yelling HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOO! THAT'S BALONEY! the second Grandpa water was brought up.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This reminds of Judge Judy
I didn’t understand, only the coach was informed, but not Kamila?Related or not?
![]()
Стало известно о нарушении при информировании Валиевой о допинг-пробе
Информирование российской фигуристки Камилы Валиевой о положительной допинг-пробе произошло с процессуальным нарушением, сообщил РИА Новости источник, знакомый... РИА Новости Спорт, 28.09.2023rsport.ria.ru
MOSCOW, September 28 - RIA Novosti, Vlad Zhukov. Informing Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva about a positive doping test occurred with a procedural violation, a source familiar with the situation told RIA Novosti.
Valieva's doping test, taken during the Russian Championship in December 2021, gave a positive result for trimetazidine. This information became known after the team tournament at the 2022 Olympic Games in Beijing , where Valieva won a gold medal as part of the Russian team. She was able to compete in the individual tournament, where she finished fourth, but her case for a potential anti-doping rule violation is currently pending before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
“Valieva did not receive notification of a positive doping test from WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency). The notification came first to the ISU (International Skating Union) and the IOC (International Olympic Committee), and only after that to (Valieva’s coach) Eteri Tutberidze. This is a procedural matter. violation," the source said.
On January 13, 2023, RUSADA finally renders a verdict deciding to strip Valieva of her gold medal and title from the 2022 Russian Figure Skating Nationals due to the positive test but refused to strip her of her gold medal in the Olympic team event.
In response, WADA pressed its request for CAS to review this case adding the RUSADA decision, which is taking place now.
To be fair, the ISU is on WADA’s side pushing for Valieva’s suspension and to strike her scores from the team competition, and to disqualify the Russian team.It’s incredibly difficult to be a fan of this sport. Which is why I only pop in a few times a year to see what’s up. My heart breaks - once again - for the athletes ? Eventually, I won't have a heart left to break.
Except that testing positive for a banned drug usually comes with a far longer period of suspension than merely one day.Valieva's doping test, taken during the Russian Championship in December 2021, gave a positive result for trimetazidine, which became known after the team tournament at the 2022 Olympic Games in Beijing. Valieva was already punished for the positive test as she lost her gold medal and title from the 2022 Russian Figure Skating Nationals. Valieva was clean during the 2022 Olympic Games in Beijing. The case could have been clear-cut, if she had tested positive for trimetazidine in Beijing.
We have no idea if she was clean during the Olympics. Even if she had tested positive, since she was a "protected person" at that time, her case would have been handled without public disclosure, so we cannot assume that she was clean.
Because Russia wants to keep that gold medal at all costs and they'd certainly have kept it quiet if she tested positive again. I cannot see how WADA, the IOC or ISU would want that sort of information to leak either, as it would call into serious question any disciplinary action taken and her rights to due process.Why do you think it wouldn't have surfaced by now if she had doped for the Olympics as well?
Who leaked her status during the Olympics?Because Russia wants to keep that gold medal at all costs and they'd certainly have kept it quiet if she tested positive again. I cannot see how WADA, the IOC or ISU would want that sort of information to leak either, as it would call into serious question any disciplinary action taken and her rights to due process.
Like I said in the same post you quoted:Valieva's doping test, taken during the Russian Championship in December 2021, rendered a positive result for trimetazidine, which became known after the team tournament at the 2022 Olympic Games in Beijing. Valieva was already punished for the positive test as she lost her gold medal and title from the 2022 Russian Figure Skating Nationals. Valieva was clean during the 2022 Olympic Games in Beijing. The case could have been clear-cut, if she had tested positive for trimetazidine in Beijing.
I only brought up this issue because the fear that Valieva could appeal a "negative" decision by CAS based on her due process rights violation, but the decision was rendered nearly four months after Russia stopped being a "high performing member" of the European Convention for Human Rights, and, thus, wouldn't have standing to bring forth a case with the European Court for Human Rights, and even if RUSADA had rendered that decision on or before September 16, 2022, her claim could only be brought up against RUSADA and their decision, not CAS's decision which will be rendered more than a year after European Court of Human Rights would have had jurisdiction over the case.Thus far, no action by any official or state entity has been taken against Valieva as a result of the positive urine sample other than the January 13, 2023 RUSADA ruling. She was affected by the ban on Russian and Belarussian athletes due to the invasion of Ukraine, but that is unrelated to this issue, and she has been freely been able to compete or skate within Russian borders.
Well, the only reason anything leaked is because the IOC delayed the medal ceremony and there were reporters on the ground, digging into it. And given that RUSADA/the ROC have tried to float the idea that because the information about the positive test was leaked and her status as a "protected person" violated as a result of that leak, I cannot imagine that the IOC/ISU/WADA would do anything to jeopardize any action over a later, hypothetical positive doping test.Who leaked her status during the Olympics?
By the way, her results have not been disqualified yet. This means there is still no decision from WADA.Whatever the case with the Olympics and her drug testing status there, it doesn't matter that the positive test happened at Russian Nationals. She continued her season as normal without any problems, regardless of the Nationals title being taken away.
I will remind people that Berezhnaya was banned for three months, had her Europeans title taken away, and missed out on Worlds, because of cough medicine. Laura Barquero has been sitting out for how long now over her incident?
Skaters don't ever and haven't ever gotten a slap on the wrist and had a competition spanning three days be their only punishment.
Right, but then I find it reasonable to assume there wasn't a positive test during the Olympics, because these same reporters would have been all over it...Well, the only reason anything leaked is because the IOC delayed the medal ceremony and there were reporters on the ground, digging into it.
And I don't think it's reasonable to make that assumption. The only reason they knew was because of the delayed medal ceremony and the IOC said they wouldn't hold the women's medal ceremony if Valieva medaled after that CAS Arbitration panel allowed her to compete in the Women's event. There wouldn't have been any reason for the reporters to get any whiff of something like that happening.Right, but then I find it reasonable to assume there wasn't a positive test during the Olympics, because these same reporters would have been all over it...
Wasn't it somebody from the Russian delegation who was ultimately responsible for the leak?Who leaked her status during the Olympics?
But if she had tested positive during the Olympics, why would the IOC or anyone else involved let her compete at all? The reporters would have dug into after that. I thought the individual event only happened for her at all because the test wasn't during the Olympics and they didn't know what to do because she was protected.And I don't think it's reasonable to make that assumption. The only reason they knew was because of the delayed medal ceremony and the IOC said they wouldn't hold the women's medal ceremony if Valieva medaled after that CAS Arbitration panel allowed her to compete in the Women's event. There wouldn't have been any reason for the reporters to get any whiff of something like that happening.
From Karen's detailed timeline: https://www.fsuniverse.net/forum/th...y-for-team-medals.109402/page-62#post-6337494Feb 9th (Beijing time) - FIRST report surfaces that there is a positive doping test and absolutely NO hint in that first report that it involved a protected person - https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1119022/beijing-2022-figure-skating-medal-delay
...
Feb 9th - Christine Brennan of USA Today is the first English-language press to identify Valieva "Russian newspaper RBC reported that Valieva tested positive for trimetazidine, a heart medication that has been banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency since 2014 because it can improve endurance and blood flow." - https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...-medals-delayed-russian-drug-test/6717526001/
On a similar note, then, if Valieva had tested positive during the Olympics, and therefore rightly not been allowed to compete at all... why would it matter if she was "protected"? We would have known, or the reporters would have made it known. Or are some here assuming that she would have been allowed to compete despite testing positive simply because she was protected. Which is why I think it's correct to assume she hadn't doped during the Olympics. Assuming fair procedures would be followed in such a case anyway.Now, there has never been any sort of smoking gun or piece of evidence that anybody from the IOC, ISU, or WADA breached their duty of confidentiality. However, this whole process revealed how existing procedures were not equipped to deal with this particular issue where there is a standard procedure of delaying the awarding of medals when a prospective medalist had tested positive for a banned substance for a drug test administered prior to the competition but before the medal ceremony AND where that athlete who had tested positive is a minor who has "protected status" and is the only "minor" athlete with that protected status.
They knew what to do, but CAS went in a different direction. WADA argued that during the emergent hearing, CAS absolutely misapplied their pretty explicit standards on the type of action that should take place when a positive drug test is revealed in the middle of the Olympics, even when the result was from a minor athlete.But if she had tested positive during the Olympics, why would the IOC or anyone else involved let her compete at all? The reporters would have dug into after that. I thought the individual event only happened for her at all because the test wasn't during the Olympics and they didn't know what to do because she was protected.
It's not just that medal. Everything points to a cosy, cooperative arrangement between RUSADA, the FSFR, the ROC. and Eteri Tutberidze that amounts to state-sponsored doping, which, this time around, might get Russia booted out of the Olympics indefinitely.Because Russia wants to keep that gold medal at all costs and they'd certainly have kept it quiet if she tested positive again. I cannot see how WADA, the IOC or ISU would want that sort of information to leak either, as it would call into serious question any disciplinary action taken and her rights to due process.
I don't believe she tested positive at the Olympics either, nor is that an issue being brought up with CAS by any of the appealing organizations. That being said, outside of formal procedures responsible for determining fault and punishment, regular people don't have to believe that she wasn't still doping. Given the history of Russia and doping and methods used to "beat" tests, it's not like their skepticism over whether Russian athletes were actually clean is without merit. But that's personal opinion, and you can't really argue against that even with all the empirical evidence in the world that this positive test was just a onetime mistake thanks to Grandpa's medication contaminating or being accidentally mixed in with whatever allowable substances she was taking.On a similar note, then, if Valieva had tested positive during the Olympics, and therefore rightly not been allowed to compete at all... why would it matter if she was "protected"? Or are some here assuming that she would have been allowed to compete despite testing positive. Which is why I think it's correct to assume she hadn't doped during the Olympics. Assuming fair procedures would be followed in such a case anyway.
which, this time around, might get Russia booted out of the Olympics indefinitely.
Not if the intention is to drag things out until everyone's exhausted and the russians get their way despite their flagrant cheating...could be something that any competent lawyer would have anticipated
Yep. They've gotten away with it for well over a decade with no real consequences. And the IOC is still trying to find a politically palatable way to get Russians back in international sport.Bet it doesn’t.
Laura Barquero last posted publicly about her situation back on April 11, 2023: https://www.fsuniverse.net/forum/th...-olympics-pairs-sp.109467/page-4#post-6422145By the way, her [Barquero/Zandron's] results have not been disqualified yet. This means there is still no decision from WADA.
Laura currently posts regular fitness/Pilates clips in her Instagram stories and uses her social media to show that she is trying to stay positive and live her life as best she can.Laura's sad post (no news) 8 months later: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cq5_V-JtBLO/
Machine translation:
Trying to stay strong, thinking about all the good things I have in this life.
I have better days and worse days but that pain is always there and it doesn't go away.
I couldn't say goodbye to that feeling, that feeling I miss so much, the cold wind on my face, to feel the movements flowing, to close my eyes and end up with a huge smile on my face.
I've been washed away by a hurricane and I'm still spinning.
Marco, my family, my friends, are always there, helping and supporting me, suffering and living this nightmare just like me. Everyone tells me: you can take advantage of doing other things, to have a different life, of a "normal person"... but they don't understand that since I was little I learned to fly on ice better than to walk, that ice is my home and as much as I want I can't part with it.
Anyone who knows me knows that I'm a fighter, that nothing and no one will be able to cut these wings.
LBJ?
![]()
I think with Russians it's likely they dope during the Olympic season and definitely the other seasons, and off-seasons, and have an efficient way of flushing it out before competition, or before their scheduled visits. During the Olympics (the ones not held in Russia anyway), I would assume they're careful under heightened scrutiny though. That's my personal assumption. I'm not saying Valieva only ever doped once in her life. I'm just saying, it's very likely she was clean during the Olympics, because we really would have known otherwise.But that's personal opinion, and you can't really argue against that even with all the empirical evidence in the world that this positive test was just a onetime mistake thanks to Grandpa's medication contaminating or being accidentally mixed in with whatever allowable substances she was taking.
I'm pretty sure it was someone from the IOC to InsideTheGames.biz. I don't think that's a big deal though. It was inevitable that her status was going to be made public.Who leaked her status during the Olympics?
Whether it does or doesn't, Russia wants to avoid any chance of its happening. Losing the right to participate in the Olympics matters much more to Russia than losing one dopey gold medalBet it doesn’t.