skatingguy
decently
- Messages
- 19,973
But did I remember that they sponsored a skating event, or do I just recognize the name of the company from somewhere else?Surely you recognized some of the advertisers!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But did I remember that they sponsored a skating event, or do I just recognize the name of the company from somewhere else?Surely you recognized some of the advertisers!
You mean, sort of like how FSU offers a 6-month season pass subscription and a yearly subscription? Perhaps a couple different levels of access would make the venture, if not profitable, then at least break-even.Of course, none of us is everyone else. But the service you are describing sounds expensive to maintain which means a subscription will be pricy. That's going to cut some people out. Probably more people than want to just see all of the comps live-ish.
A lot of us get Peacock for free (it's bundled in with many cable services) and I think free is a good price for watching competitions live with no replay whereas what you describe seems like way more than a $5 / month service.
The other issue with such a service is that many people watch skating starting in Sept or Oct and stop after Worlds. People already subscribe to Peacock in Oct. for Skate America and unsub after Worlds or the WTT. But this service will have costs all year round. So that's a problem they have to solve.
I dunno... They have two different channels on YT - one for the JGP and one for the rest of their events (not just FS, but also speed and synchro). I wouldn't mind seeing a service or platform that has hubs for each of the four skating divisions and streams the major competitions of each division, etc. I've explored some synchro stuff and am starting to enjoy/grasp it more, which isn't something I would have done unless it was offered as part of the Peacock FS hub or available on the SkatingISU YT channel. There's an opportunity there to expand the reach and interest of fans in all skating sports, if done right.In the end, I don't think any of this matters because I honestly don't see the ISU doing any of this. They get too much money from broadcasters still. Maybe in another 5 years when no one wants to pay for the rights to any of it, they will be motivated to start their own service.
Agreed, but it does take a bit more creativity and willingness to seek out pirate streams or go-round the geo-blocks that exist on YT. I made the point in my survey response that I'd like to legally access these competitions instead of firing up the good ol' VPN. If enough of us say something, maybe the ISU will do something to fix the problem.Btw, I don't complain about how hard it is to watch skating now.[Or at least I didn't when there were replays.] I think it's incredibly easy to watch skating now and watch a lot more than was ever shown on network tv in the US. And I can watch it on my tv and not a little computer screen! Until the issues last year with replays and stuff disappearing, I felt like we were in a mecca time period when it comes to figure skating coverage. And it's still not bad even without replays on Peacock.
Welllll, they did just sponsor US Nats and their name was splashed all over the ice, KnC backdrop, logo, etc. Sure, they're a major car manufacturer, but Nats was only a few weeks ago.But did I remember that they sponsored a skating event, or do I just recognize the name of the company from somewhere else?
I felt that way about some of them but I was very aware that Toyota was sponsoring the "2023 Toyota U.S. Figure Skating Championships"But did I remember that they sponsored a skating event, or do I just recognize the name of the company from somewhere else?
I only follow stuff that's already on Peacock so it's even easier for me.Agreed, but it does take a bit more creativity and willingness to seek out pirate streams or go-round the geo-blocks that exist on YT.o'nt h
2.5 dollars is a big sum for many who aren't living in western countries, especially for a sport like figure skating which isn't exactly known here. If the ISU wishes, it can choose a larger sum than that and make sure it has a small audience.But 2.5 for one GP event is probably not worth it. Unless it is 2.5 per each Discipline short program and 2.5 per each Discipline long.
2.5 dollars is a big sum for many who aren't living in western countries, especially for a sport like figure skating which isn't exactly known here. If the ISU wishes, it can choose a larger sum than that and make sure it has a small audience.
I don't know why you're trying to explain costs and expenditure to me. ISU has its costs and expenditure, you think I don't know? But if you expect people of the countries that don't even have skating broadcasts and are currently getting the youtube stream for free to start paying 22.5 dollars for each grand prix event and 45 dollars for each championship, it's not happening. The ISU can say goodbye to most people, and be happy about it.I'm not in the tech business or broadcast bysiness, but I do know from a volunteer position when US Nationals.was in my city, the amount of work and # of employees to produce the live broadcast is incredible. Because I was a local and had some knowledge of the arena inner area, I was assigned as a runner for the crew.
Complain all you want about the stationary cameras during practices or lower level events, but the coordination of the boom cameras, the stationary cameras, the views needed for judges review is hard work requiring a great deal of expertise.
It was amazing to hear the technical callers/assistant tech caller to note "review" and see the video marking to go back to review and slow motion. There are a lot more review calls than people know about.
That requires employees, cameras, video equipment way more than is obvious to the viewer.
Nothing is really free. Someone, somewhere with great skill and expertise is needed. The junior camera operators get lower level skaters aa they learn their trade. Someone stepping or pulling a cord - I'm surprised it doesn't happen more. Miles of cords taped in place - it's like those Mission Impossible mock up of trip wires.
Maybe there is a sliding scale reflecting income levels of poorer countries. I dont know. But making it impossible for ISU or other Federations to provide a product will not increase butts in the seats or increase viewership.
Nothing is free, not even on the Internet.
Let me ask you a different question then. Your proposal based off my reply means someone wanting to watch 6 grand prixs + GPF + the three championships needs to pay 292.5 dollars per season.Do you not expect to be paid for your work?
This is why a yearly or skating season pass could be put in place. If you can pay, then you will and if you can't, I'm sure said people will still find a way to see everything after the fact. Not much different than it is now.I don't know why you're trying to explain costs and expenditure to me. ISU has its costs and expenditure, you think I don't know? But if you expect people of the countries that don't even have skating broadcasts and are currently getting the youtube stream for free to start paying 22.5 dollars for each grand prix event and 45 dollars for each championship, it's not happening. The ISU can say goodbye to most people, and be happy about it.
So you miss the point of season subscription?Let me ask you a different question then. Your proposal means based off my reply means someone wanting to watch 6 grand prixs + GPF + the three championships needs to pay 292.5 dollars per season.
How many Americans are willing to furnish that per season, again? I imagine you'll propose the Olympics to be 10 dollars per segment per discipline as well, so I can rack that up and get back to you for the every four year fans.
By my proposal, 2.5*7+5*3 = 32.5, so let's say 40 dollars per season is perfectly fine.This is why a yearly or skating season pass could be put in place. If you can pay, then you will and if you can't, I'm sure said people will still find a way to see everything after the fact. Not much different than it is now.
But sponsors of US Nationals don't count towards the question. The question specifies ISU Event Commercial Partner, but I still won't remember who sponsored US Nationals even when they are a major car manufacturer. Maybe when the sponsor is a major jam producer because I can remember Smucker's Skating Spectacular.Welllll, they did just sponsor US Nats and their name was splashed all over the ice, KnC backdrop, logo, etc. Sure, they're a major car manufacturer, but Nats was only a few weeks ago.![]()
I'm sure they could have the technology to do a season pass where only events from 2023/2024 were available, for example, and then a higher/premium level for archived stuff and maybe other special features. Hell, the ISU could even give a basic access free subscription that allowed for certain events to be viewed for free.By my proposal, 2.5*7+5*3 = 32.5, so let's say 40 dollars per season is perfectly fine.
40 dollars will also attract a much larger chunk of people than what is being said. If the ISU wants, it can also try a smaller sum for places out here initially, in order to build an audience, and then hike it up afterwards. Many will stay, even if not all.I'm sure they could have the technology to do a season pass where only events from 2023/2024 were available, for example, and then a higher/premium level for archived stuff and maybe other special features.
So to be clear, you'd rather pay $10 for each of Worlds, World Juniors, Europeans, and Four Continents for example to total $40 just for those four events? A season pass can probably be $40 or $60 or whatever and tons of people will still pay from all over the world IMO, and you get a lot more to watch.40 dollars will also attract a much larger chunk of people than what is being said. If the ISU wants, it can also try a smaller sum for places out here initially, in order to build an audience, and then hike it up afterwards. Many will stay, even if not all.
Paying per event and being able to access it afterwards at any time sounds more attractive to me though. I'd pay 10 dollars per championship if that can happen.
I'd have a 40 dollar season pass, or I can pay a per event pass with ensured archiving, whichever I find better depending on the season and event and the people competing in any given event. I think having this separation is also good for people who don't have the time to watch all season, but still want to tune into worlds.So to be clear, you'd rather pay $10 for each of Worlds, World Juniors, Europeans, and Four Continents for example to total $40 just for those four events? A season pass can probably be $40 or $60 or whatever and tons of people will still pay from all over the world IMO, and you get a lot more to watch.
They already have some stuff up:Is anyone familiar with the site 'Recast' which is mentioned in the questionnaire? I had never heard of it before, but it seems like it might be the site that the ISU wants to use.
![]()
Useful links
Maintain complete control of your rights by embedding your content on your website. Unlock extra revenue with chosen affiliate websites too. Set your own price per view, geo-blocking + more.watch.recast.tv
I saw that - all speed skating content from the past couple weeks, and some promotional videos.They already have some stuff up:
![]()
Useful links
Maintain complete control of your rights by embedding your content on your website. Unlock extra revenue with chosen affiliate websites too. Set your own price per view, geo-blocking + more.watch.recast.tv
The advertising question needed a “none of the above” response.Interesting that for the questions on "which games would you like to play online" and "which of these advertisers do you recognize" there was no option for "none of the above".....